Achieving the 17 sustainable development goals within 9 planetary boundaries
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jonathan F. Donges | Johan Rockström | David Collste | Jørgen Randers | Per Espen Stoknes | Ulrich Goluke | Sarah E. Cornell
[1] Johan Rockström,et al. The Empirical Bases for the Earth3 Model: Technical Notes on the Sustainable Development Goals and Planetary Boundaries , 2018 .
[2] Markus Hametner,et al. Sustainable Development in the European Union. Monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context (2019 edition) , 2019 .
[3] Dennis L. Meadows,et al. Limits to growth : the 30-year update , 2004 .
[4] A. Mol,et al. Global environmental politics and governance: a networks and flows perspective , 2012 .
[5] J. Randers. How Fast Will China Grow Towards 2030 , 2016 .
[6] Emmanuel Saez,et al. World inequality report 2018 , 2018 .
[7] Keywan Riahi,et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways , 2013, Climatic Change.
[8] Wolfgang Lucht,et al. Collateral transgression of planetary boundaries due to climate engineering by terrestrial carbon dioxide removal , 2016 .
[9] W. Collins,et al. Evaluation of climate models , 2013 .
[10] J. Eom,et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .
[11] W. Lutz,et al. Demographic and Human Capital Scenarios for the 21st Century: 2018 assessment for 201 countries , 2018 .
[12] Yaman Barlas,et al. Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics , 1996 .
[13] S. Busch,et al. Identifying Sustainability and Knowledge Gaps in Socio-Economic Pathways Vis-à-Vis the Sustainable Development Goals , 2018 .
[14] Bob Frankston,et al. Beyond limits , 1997 .
[15] O. ZAHN,et al. Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World , 2009 .
[16] J. Syvitski,et al. Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene , 2016 .
[17] Ulrich Goluke,et al. Earth3 model system , 2018 .
[18] J. Rockström,et al. Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet , 2013, Nature.
[19] S. Solomon. The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .
[20] R. Feenstra,et al. The Next Generation of the Penn World Table , 2013 .
[21] Brian C. O'Neill,et al. Modelling feedbacks between human and natural processes in the land system , 2017, Earth System Dynamics.
[22] Jørgen Randers,et al. A user-friendly earth system model of low complexity: the ESCIMO system dynamics model of global warming towards 2100 , 2016 .
[23] G. Schmidt-Traub,et al. SDG Index and Dashboards Report 2018. Global responsibilities. Implementing the goals. , 2018 .
[24] Julia K. Steinberger,et al. A good life for all within planetary boundaries , 2018, Nature Sustainability.
[25] Jonathan D. Moyer,et al. Alternative pathways to human development: Assessing trade-offs and synergies in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals , 2019, Futures.
[26] P. Newell. The Political Ecology of Globalization , 2012 .
[27] Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al. Horses for courses : analytical tools to explore planetary boundaries , 2015 .
[28] Will Steffen,et al. The topology of non-linear global carbon dynamics: from tipping points to planetary boundaries , 2013 .
[29] Anthony Mcgrew,et al. Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture , 2000 .
[30] D. Vuuren,et al. Pathways to achieve a set of ambitious global sustainability objectives by 2050: Explorations using the IMAGE integrated assessment model , 2015 .
[31] S. Seneviratne,et al. Concerns of young protesters are justified , 2019, Science.
[32] S. Carpenter,et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.
[33] Graciela Metternicht,et al. National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A comparative review of scenario modelling tools , 2016 .
[34] Veronika Eyring,et al. Evaluation of Climate Models. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2013 .
[35] Kesten C. Green,et al. Simple Versus Complex Forecasting: The Evidence , 2015 .
[36] Kate Raworth,et al. A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? , 2012 .
[37] Ulrich Parlitz,et al. Sustainability, collapse and oscillations in a simple World-Earth model , 2017 .
[38] Richard E. Klosterman,et al. Simple and Complex Models , 2012 .
[39] S. McLaren,et al. Exploring the Linkages Between the Environmental Sustainable Development Goals and Planetary Boundaries Using the DPSIR Impact Pathway Framework , 2018 .
[40] J. Randers,et al. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[41] F. Chapin,et al. Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity , 2009 .
[42] Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al. The challenges of applying planetary boundaries as a basis for strategic decision-making in companies with global supply chains , 2017 .
[43] Wolfgang Lucht,et al. Taxonomies for structuring models for World-Earth system analysisof the Anthropocene: subsystems, their interactions andsocial-ecological feedback loops , 2018 .
[44] L. Codispoti. The limits to growth , 1997, Nature.
[45] Wolfgang Lucht,et al. Closing the loop: Reconnecting human dynamics to Earth System science , 2017 .
[46] C. Bretherton,et al. Clouds and Aerosols , 2013 .
[47] M. Wackernagel,et al. Making the Sustainable Development Goals Consistent with Sustainability , 2017, Front. Energy Res..
[48] N. Stern,et al. Unlocking the inclusive growth story of the 21st Century: accelerating climate action in urgent times , 2018 .