Visual reconstruction from 2-photon calcium imaging suggests linear readout properties of neurons in mouse primary visual cortex

Deciphering the neural code, that is interpreting the responses of sensory neurons from the perspective of a downstream population, is an important step towards understanding how the brain processes sensory stimulation. While previous work has focused on classification algorithms to identify the most likely stimulus label in a predefined set of categories, fewer studies have approached a full stimulus reconstruction task. Outstanding questions revolve around the type of algorithm that is most suited to decoding (i.e. full reconstruction, in the context of this study), especially in the presence of strong encoding non-linearities, and the possible role of pairwise correlations. We present, here, the first pixel-by-pixel reconstruction of a complex natural stimulus from 2-photon calcium imaging responses of mouse primary visual cortex (V1). We decoded the activity of approximately 100 neurons from layer 2/3 using an optimal linear estimator and an artificial neural network. We also investigated how much accuracy is lost in this decoding operation when ignoring pairwise neural correlations. We found that a simple linear estimator is sufficient to extract relevant stimulus features from the neural responses, and that it was not significantly outperformed by a non-linear decoding algorithm. The importance of pairwise correlations for reconstruction accuracy was also limited. The results of this study suggest that, conditional on the spatial and temporal limits of the recording technique, V1 neurons display linear readout properties, with low information content in the joint distribution of their activity.

[1]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[2]  C. Stosiek,et al.  In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Jorrit Steven Montijn,et al.  Population coding in mouse visual cortex: response reliability and dissociability of stimulus tuning and noise correlation , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[4]  Hannes Bleuler,et al.  Active tactile exploration enabled by a brain-machine-brain interface , 2011, Nature.

[5]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Image Representation Using 2D Gabor Wavelets , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Chethan Pandarinath,et al.  Retinal prosthetic strategy with the capacity to restore normal vision , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Matthew Chalk,et al.  Efficiency turns the table on neural encoding, decoding and noise , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[9]  C. Niell,et al.  What can mice tell us about how vision works? , 2011, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  Herwig Baier,et al.  Characterization of Genetically Targeted Neuron Types in the Zebrafish Optic Tectum , 2011, Front. Neural Circuits.

[11]  Ha Hong,et al.  Simple Learned Weighted Sums of Inferior Temporal Neuronal Firing Rates Accurately Predict Human Core Object Recognition Performance , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Arnulf B. A. Graf,et al.  Decoding the activity of neuronal populations in macaque primary visual cortex , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  André Longtin,et al.  To Burst or Not to Burst? , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[15]  Pamela Reinagel,et al.  Decoding visual information from a population of retinal ganglion cells. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  James J DiCarlo,et al.  Eight open questions in the computational modeling of higher sensory cortex , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Interpreting neuronal population activity by reconstruction: unified framework with application to hippocampal place cells. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Cristopher M. Niell,et al.  Exploring the Next Frontier of Mouse Vision , 2011, Neuron.

[19]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  Fast nonnegative deconvolution for spike train inference from population calcium imaging. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  J. H. Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998 .

[21]  Christian Ledig,et al.  Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[22]  Emilio Salinas,et al.  Vector reconstruction from firing rates , 1994, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[23]  Max Planck,et al.  Tracking historical papers and their citations , 2012 .

[24]  Yizhen Zhang,et al.  Neural Encoding and Decoding with Deep Learning for Dynamic Natural Vision , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  R. Quiroga,et al.  Extracting information from neuronal populations : information theory and decoding approaches , 2022 .

[26]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[27]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Simon R. Schultz,et al.  The Ising decoder: reading out the activity of large neural ensembles , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[29]  Ha Hong,et al.  Explicit information for category-orthogonal object properties increases along the ventral stream , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Concha Bielza,et al.  A survey on multi‐output regression , 2015, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[31]  Philipp J. Keller,et al.  Whole-brain functional imaging at cellular resolution using light-sheet microscopy , 2013, Nature Methods.

[32]  William Bialek,et al.  Reading a Neural Code , 1991, NIPS.

[33]  A. Pouget,et al.  Neural correlations, population coding and computation , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Neural Networks for Efficient Bayesian Decoding of Natural Images from Retinal Neurons , 2017, bioRxiv.

[35]  Leonardo Franco,et al.  The use of decoding to analyze the contribution to the information of the correlations between the firing of simultaneously recorded neurons , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Georg Martius,et al.  Nonlinear decoding of a complex movie from the mammalian retina , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  Hamutal Slovin,et al.  Reconstruction of shape contours from V1 activity at high resolution , 2016, NeuroImage.

[38]  Ayaka Kato,et al.  Forgetting in Reinforcement Learning Links Sustained Dopamine Signals to Motivation , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  P. Latham,et al.  Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes, Revisited , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Grigorios Tsoumakas,et al.  Multi-target regression via input space expansion: treating targets as inputs , 2012, Machine Learning.

[42]  Ryan J. Prenger,et al.  Bayesian Reconstruction of Natural Images from Human Brain Activity , 2009, Neuron.

[43]  James A. Bednar,et al.  Model Constrained by Visual Hierarchy Improves Prediction of Neural Responses to Natural Scenes , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulus Statistics Alter the Receptive Field Structure of V1 Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Inverse retinotopy: Inferring the visual content of images from brain activation patterns , 2006, NeuroImage.

[46]  B. Willmore,et al.  Neural Representation of Natural Images in Visual Area V2 , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  E T Rolls,et al.  Correlations and the encoding of information in the nervous system , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  Morgane M. Roth,et al.  Representation of visual scenes by local neuronal populations in layer 2/3 of mouse visual cortex , 2011, Front. Neural Circuits.

[49]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Noisy matrix decomposition via convex relaxation: Optimal rates in high dimensions , 2011, ICML.

[50]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  High Accuracy Decoding of Dynamical Motion from a Large Retinal Population , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  J. Gallant,et al.  Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies , 2011, Current Biology.

[52]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Model-Based Decoding, Information Estimation, and Change-Point Detection Techniques for Multineuron Spike Trains , 2011, Neural Computation.

[53]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Structure learning and the Occam's razor principle: a new view of human function acquisition , 2014, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[54]  Sheila Nirenberg,et al.  Decoding neuronal spike trains: How important are correlations? , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  P. Latham,et al.  Ruling out and ruling in neural codes , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  G B Stanley,et al.  Reconstruction of Natural Scenes from Ensemble Responses in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  J. Macke,et al.  Neural population coding: combining insights from microscopic and mass signals , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics , 2001, Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001.