DNA-mediated cooperativity facilitates the co-selection of cryptic enhancer sequences by SOX2 and PAX6 transcription factors

Sox2 and Pax6 are transcription factors that direct cell fate decision during neurogenesis, yet the mechanism behind how they cooperate on enhancer DNA elements and regulate gene expression is unclear. By systematically interrogating Sox2 and Pax6 interaction on minimal enhancer elements, we found that cooperative DNA recognition relies on combinatorial nucleotide switches and precisely spaced, but cryptic composite DNA motifs. Surprisingly, all tested Sox and Pax paralogs have the capacity to cooperate on such enhancer elements. NMR and molecular modeling reveal very few direct protein–protein interactions between Sox2 and Pax6, suggesting that cooperative binding is mediated by allosteric interactions propagating through DNA structure. Furthermore, we detected and validated several novel sites in the human genome targeted cooperatively by Sox2 and Pax6. Collectively, we demonstrate that Sox–Pax partnerships have the potential to substantially alter DNA target specificities and likely enable the pleiotropic and context-specific action of these cell-lineage specifiers.

[1]  S. Aota,et al.  Pax6 autoregulation mediated by direct interaction of Pax6 protein with the head surface ectoderm-specific enhancer of the mouse Pax6 gene. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[2]  R. Sandberg,et al.  Sequentially acting Sox transcription factors in neural lineage development. , 2011, Genes & development.

[3]  Xueshan Xiao,et al.  A novel mutation of PAX6 in Chinese patients with new clinical features of Peters’ anomaly , 2010, Molecular vision.

[4]  G. Stormo,et al.  Spec-seq: determining protein-DNA-binding specificity by sequencing. , 2015, Briefings in functional genomics.

[5]  Matthias Wilmanns,et al.  Crystal structure of a POU/HMG/DNA ternary complex suggests differential assembly of Oct4 and Sox2 on two enhancers. , 2003, Genes & development.

[6]  J A Epstein,et al.  Crystal structure of the human Pax6 paired domain-DNA complex reveals specific roles for the linker region and carboxy-terminal subdomain in DNA binding. , 1999, Genes & development.

[7]  Claude Desplan,et al.  Crystal structure of a paired domain-DNA complex at 2.5 å resolution reveals structural basis for pax developmental mutations , 1995, Cell.

[8]  G M Clore,et al.  Structural basis for SRY-dependent 46-X,Y sex reversal: modulation of DNA bending by a naturally occurring point mutation. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  David A. Case,et al.  Structural basis for DNA bending by the architectural transcription factor LEF-1 , 1995, Nature.

[10]  N. Corbi,et al.  Developmental-specific activity of the FGF-4 enhancer requires the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3. , 1995, Genes & development.

[11]  T. Bardakjian,et al.  Novel SOX2 mutations and genotype–phenotype correlation in anophthalmia and microphthalmia , 2009, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[12]  P. Kolatkar,et al.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the Pax9 paired domain bound to a DC5 enhancer DNA element. , 2014, Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications.

[13]  L. Stanton,et al.  The long noncoding RNA RMST interacts with SOX2 to regulate neurogenesis. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[14]  T. Meehan,et al.  An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues , 2014, Nature.

[15]  Shyam Prabhakar,et al.  Structure of Smad1 MH1/DNA complex reveals distinctive rearrangements of BMP and TGF-β effectors , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  R. Mann,et al.  Cofactor Binding Evokes Latent Differences in DNA Binding Specificity between Hox Proteins , 2011, Cell.

[17]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Nano-analysis of DNA conformation changes induced by transcription factor complex binding using plasmonic nanodimers. , 2013, ACS nano.

[18]  I. Tzoulaki,et al.  PAX6 mutations: genotype-phenotype correlations , 2005, BMC Genetics.

[19]  Dan Xie,et al.  Dynamic trans-Acting Factor Colocalization in Human Cells , 2013, Cell.

[20]  Prasanna R Kolatkar,et al.  The crystal structure of the Sox4 HMG domain-DNA complex suggests a mechanism for positional interdependence in DNA recognition. , 2012, The Biochemical journal.

[21]  Shane J. Neph,et al.  An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints , 2012, Nature.

[22]  Shyam Prabhakar,et al.  Deciphering the Sox-Oct partner code by quantitative cooperativity measurements , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  G. Saunders,et al.  Mouse Small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene , 1991, Nature.

[24]  E. Segal,et al.  In pursuit of design principles of regulatory sequences , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  P. Gruss,et al.  Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS. , 1991, Development.

[26]  L. Stanton,et al.  Sox Transcription Factors Require Selective Interactions with Oct4 and Specific Transactivation Functions to Mediate Reprogramming , 2013, Stem cells.

[27]  P Gruss,et al.  Pax genes and their roles in cell differentiation and development. , 1996, Current opinion in cell biology.

[28]  J. Epstein,et al.  Identification of a Pax paired domain recognition sequence and evidence for DNA-dependent conformational changes. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[29]  Masayuki Endo,et al.  Single molecule visualization and characterization of Sox2-Pax6 complex formation on a regulatory DNA element using a DNA origami frame. , 2014, Nano letters.

[30]  M. Busslinger,et al.  DNA-binding and transactivation properties of Pax-6: three amino acids in the paired domain are responsible for the different sequence recognition of Pax-6 and BSAP (Pax-5) , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[31]  Ralf Jauch,et al.  glbase: a framework for combining, analyzing and displaying heterogeneous genomic and high-throughput sequencing data , 2014, Cell Regeneration.

[32]  P. Callaerts,et al.  Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. , 1995, Science.

[33]  M. Vingron,et al.  A naturally occuring insertion of a single amino acid rewires transcriptional regulation by glucocorticoid receptor isoforms , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Lin Yang,et al.  GBshape: a genome browser database for DNA shape annotations , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[35]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Pairing SOX off: with partners in the regulation of embryonic development. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[36]  R. Keller,et al.  The Computer Aided Resonance Assignment Tutorial , 2004 .

[37]  C. Glass,et al.  Reprogramming Transcription via Distinct Classes of Enhancers Functionally Defined by eRNA , 2011, Nature.

[38]  Felipe Merino,et al.  Structural basis for the SOX-dependent genomic redistribution of OCT4 in stem cell differentiation. , 2014, Structure.

[39]  J. Epstein,et al.  Sox10 and Pax3 physically interact to mediate activation of a conserved c-RET enhancer. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[40]  H. Kalbitzer,et al.  Protein NMR Spectroscopy. Principles and Practice , 1997 .

[41]  L. Orozco,et al.  Molecular analysis of the PAX6 gene in Mexican patients with congenital aniridia: report of four novel mutations , 2008, Molecular vision.

[42]  K. Imada,et al.  PAX6 and SOX2‐dependent regulation of the Sox2 enhancer N‐3 involved in embryonic visual system development , 2007, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[43]  E. Hazai,et al.  Identification of a polyoxometalate inhibitor of the DNA binding activity of Sox2. , 2011, ACS chemical biology.

[44]  C. Garvie,et al.  Structural studies of Ets-1/Pax5 complex formation on DNA. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[45]  A. Bhinge,et al.  MiR‐135b is a direct PAX6 target and specifies human neuroectoderm by inhibiting TGF‐β/BMP signaling , 2014, The EMBO journal.

[46]  Matthias Wilmanns,et al.  Synergism with the Coactivator OBF-1 (OCA-B, BOB-1) Is Mediated by a Specific POU Dimer Configuration , 2000, Cell.

[47]  G. Gole,et al.  Novel SOX2 partner-factor domain mutation in a four-generation family , 2009, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[48]  G. Schaffner,et al.  DNA sequence recognition by Pax proteins: bipartite structure of the paired domain and its binding site. , 1993, Genes & development.

[49]  M. Götz,et al.  Functional dissection of the paired domain of Pax6 reveals molecular mechanisms of coordinating neurogenesis and proliferation , 2013, Development.

[50]  T. Hughes,et al.  Jury remains out on simple models of transcription factor specificity , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[51]  M. Yamada,et al.  Missense mutations in the PAX6 gene in aniridia. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[52]  Ying Jin,et al.  Pax6 is a human neuroectoderm cell fate determinant. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[53]  A. Mandal,et al.  PAX6 gene mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in sporadic cases of aniridia from India , 2003, Ophthalmic genetics.

[54]  Lars Hufnagel,et al.  Subtle Changes in Motif Positioning Cause Tissue-Specific Effects on Robustness of an Enhancer's Activity , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[55]  A. Moore,et al.  Detailed ophthalmologic evaluation of 43 individuals with PAX6 mutations. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[56]  W. Gehring,et al.  Functional analysis of the chicken δ1-crystallin enhancer activity in Drosophila reveals remarkable evolutionary conservation between chicken and fly , 2005, Development.

[57]  P. Kolatkar,et al.  Crystal structure of the dimeric Oct6 (POU3f1) POU domain bound to palindromic MORE DNA , 2010, Proteins.

[58]  R. Lovell-Badge,et al.  Involvement of SOX proteins in lens‐specific activation of crystallin genes. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[59]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Pax6 and SOX2 form a co-DNA-binding partner complex that regulates initiation of lens development. , 2001, Genes & development.

[60]  Kevin J. Chalmers,et al.  Discovery and assessment of conserved Pax6 target genes and enhancers. , 2011, Genome research.

[61]  Jiaxuan Chen,et al.  Conversion of Sox17 into a Pluripotency Reprogramming Factor by Reengineering Its Association with Oct4 on DNA , 2011, Stem cells.

[62]  J. Epstein,et al.  Getting your Pax straight: Pax proteins in development and disease. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[63]  E. Segal,et al.  The grammar of transcriptional regulation , 2014, Human Genetics.

[64]  Matthew Slattery,et al.  Absence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome. , 2014, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[65]  M. Rosenfeld,et al.  Allosteric effects of Pit-1 DNA sites on long-term repression in cell type specification. , 2000, Science.

[66]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Interplay of Pax6 and SOX2 in lens development as a paradigm of genetic switch mechanisms for cell differentiation. , 2004, The International journal of developmental biology.