Differences in cigarette design and metal content across five countries: results from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Project.

Objectives The current study examines physical cigarette design characteristics and tobacco metal content of cigarettes obtained from 5 countries to determine how these properties vary for cigarette brands, both within and across countries with different dominant manufacturers. Methods Cigarette packs were collected from International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey (ITC) participants in the U.S., the U.K., Mauritius, Mexico, and Thailand. Cigarettes were assessed for physical and design properties (eg, ventilation, pressure drop, rod density, weight) by published methods, and for metal content (As, Cd, Ni, Pb) by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Results Significant differences in cigarette design and toxic metal concentrations were observed between countries and between manufacturers within countries. Filter ventilation, which is strongly predictive of machine-measured tar and nicotine levels, varied most widely across countries. Ni and Cd were highest in Thailand (2.23ug/g and 1.64ug/g, respectively); As was highest in Mexico (0.29ug/g) and Pb was highest in the U.K. (0.43 ug/g). Conclusions Parties to the FCTC should consider the adoption of uniform product standards related to cigarette design, emissions, and tobacco content that would reduce population health risks.

[1]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Interpersonal communication about pictorial health warnings on cigarette packages: Policy-related influences and relationships with smoking cessation attempts , 2015, Social science & medicine.

[2]  K. Cummings,et al.  Cigarette brands with flavour capsules in the filter: trends in use and brand perceptions among smokers in the USA, Mexico and Australia, 2012–2014 , 2015, Tobacco Control.

[3]  W. E. Stephens,et al.  Toxic metal and nicotine content of cigarettes sold in China, 2009 and 2012 , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[4]  J. Hardin,et al.  Promoting cessation resources through cigarette package warning labels: a longitudinal survey with adult smokers in Canada, Australia and Mexico , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[5]  S. N. Behera,et al.  Human health risk associated with exposure to toxic elements in mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  F. Tao,et al.  Potential health risks of heavy metals in cultivated topsoil and grain, including correlations with human primary liver, lung and gastric cancer, in Anhui province, Eastern China. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  W. E. Stephens,et al.  Toxic Metal Concentrations in Cigarettes Obtained from U.S. Smokers in 2009: Results from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) United States Survey Cohort , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[8]  K. Cummings,et al.  Relationship of cigarette-related perceptions to cigarette design features: findings from the 2009 ITC U.S. Survey. , 2013, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[9]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Tax, price and cigarette brand preferences: a longitudinal study of adult smokers from the ITC Mexico Survey , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[10]  K. Cummings,et al.  A novel approach to estimating the prevalence of untaxed cigarettes in the USA: findings from the 2009 and 2010 international tobacco control surveys , 2013, Tobacco Control.

[11]  James F. Thrasher,et al.  Level of cigarette consumption and quit behavior in a population of low-intensity smokers--longitudinal results from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) survey in Mexico. , 2013, Addictive behaviors.

[12]  Michael J Thun,et al.  50-year trends in smoking-related mortality in the United States. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R. O’Connor,et al.  Cigarette Design Features in Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries , 2012, Journal of environmental and public health.

[14]  C. Stransky,et al.  Toxicity of cigarette butts, and their chemical components, to marine and freshwater fish , 2011, Tobacco Control.

[15]  J. Moerman,et al.  Analysis of metals leached from smoked cigarette litter , 2011, Tobacco Control.

[16]  L. Kozlowski,et al.  Cigarette characteristic and emission variations across high-, middle- and low-income countries. , 2010, Public health.

[17]  K. Cummings,et al.  ITC "spit and butts" pilot study: the feasibility of collecting saliva and cigarette butt samples from smokers to evaluate policy. , 2010, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[18]  K. Straif,et al.  Mandated lowering of toxicants in cigarette smoke: a description of the World Health Organization TobReg proposal , 2008, Tobacco Control.

[19]  J. Samet,et al.  Cotinine Concentration in Smokers from Different Countries: Relationship with Amount Smoked and Cigarette Type , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention.

[20]  A Hyland,et al.  The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[21]  L. Kozlowski,et al.  How did UK cigarette makers reduce tar to 10 mg or less? , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  J. Samet,et al.  Determinants of salivary cotinine levels among current smokers in Mexico. , 2004, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[23]  David M. Burns,et al.  The scientific basis of tobacco product regulation. , 2007, World Health Organization technical report series.