Scale invariant representation of imbalanced points

Imbalance oriented candidate selection was introduced as an alternative of non-maximum suppression, aiming to improve the localization accuracy. To distinguish interest points detected via non-maximum suppression, we call interest points detected via imbalance oriented selection imbalanced points. Scale assignment for imbalanced points is not straightforward because of a dilemma of involving non-maximum suppression. The scale space theory, a popular scale assignment scheme, requests non-maximum suppression to detect extreme points from scale spaces, while imbalanced points are expected to be free of non-maximum suppression in order to maintain the localization accuracy. In this paper, we propose a bypass strategy that circumvents the above dilemma by establishing an association between an imbalanced point and a certain interest point with a known scale (e.g., Lowe's keypoints and Hessian-Laplace). Furthermore, we propose a hybrid representation of imbalanced points for a two-layer matching scheme, where the first-layer matching is based on discriminant SIFT-type descriptors of imbalanced points, and the second-layer matching is based on patch-type descriptors. Experiments show the effectiveness of the proposed scale assignment and hybrid representation.

[1]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Scale Selection Properties of Generalized Scale-Space Interest Point Detectors , 2012, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[2]  Mongi A. Abidi,et al.  On handling uncertainty in the fundamental matrix for scene and motion adaptive pose recovery , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Qi Li,et al.  Scale Assignment for Imbalanced Points , 2011, 2011 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.

[4]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Interest point detection using imbalance oriented selection , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[5]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Scale & Affine Invariant Interest Point Detectors , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  Guojun Lu,et al.  Performance Comparisons of Contour-Based Corner Detectors , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Juyang Weng,et al.  Using Discriminant Eigenfeatures for Image Retrieval , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  Christopher G. Harris,et al.  A Combined Corner and Edge Detector , 1988, Alvey Vision Conference.

[9]  Lihi Zelnik-Manor,et al.  On SIFTs and their scales , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Feature Detection with Automatic Scale Selection , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  Qi Li,et al.  A global-to-local scheme for imbalanced point matching , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[12]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Detecting salient blob-like image structures and their scales with a scale-space primal sketch: A method for focus-of-attention , 1993, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Iasonas Kokkinos,et al.  Scale invariance without scale selection , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  Bo Liu,et al.  A quick scale-invariant interest point detecting approach , 2008, Machine Vision and Applications.

[15]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Multiple view geometry in computer visiond , 2001 .

[16]  Qi Li,et al.  New similarity measures of localities for a two-layer matching scheme and estimation of fundamental matrices , 2010, Neurocomputing.

[17]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[18]  Yan Ke,et al.  PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors , 2004, CVPR 2004.

[19]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  ASIFT: A New Framework for Fully Affine Invariant Image Comparison , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[20]  Paul A. Beardsley,et al.  Sequential Updating of Projective and Affine Structure from Motion , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[21]  Pascal Fua,et al.  LDAHash: Improved Matching with Smaller Descriptors , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A Comparison of Affine Region Detectors , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[23]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Maximally Stable Local Description for Scale Selection , 2006, ECCV.

[24]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  A Robust Technique for Matching two Uncalibrated Images Through the Recovery of the Unknown Epipolar Geometry , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[25]  Xavier Binefa,et al.  A sparse curvature-based detector of affine invariant blobs , 2012, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[26]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[27]  Lihi Zelnik-Manor,et al.  Approximate Nearest Subspace Search , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[28]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[29]  Tinne Tuytelaars,et al.  Dense interest points , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[30]  Richard I. Hartley,et al.  In Defense of the Eight-Point Algorithm , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[31]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[32]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Multi-image matching using multi-scale oriented patches , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[33]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Seeking the Strongest Rigid Detector , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[34]  Qi Li,et al.  Interest Points of General Imbalance , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[35]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  A Performance Evaluation of Volumetric 3D Interest Point Detectors , 2013, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[36]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[37]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[38]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[39]  Andrea Vedaldi,et al.  Vlfeat: an open and portable library of computer vision algorithms , 2010, ACM Multimedia.