Integration of Ergonomics in the Study of Catenary Execution Projects

The railway industry is exposed to high levels of risk, work under pressure and a large margin to the unpredictable when remodelling works are carried out. The aim of this study is to analyse and evaluate the railway activity, specifically those that uses catenary technology, from an ergonomic point of view during the excavation, concreting and pole raising phases. In order to do this, a workplace during the catenary assembly procedure was analysed using the OWAS method. The application of this method to the mentioned procedure showed that the most outstanding ergonomic risks are those related to load handling, repetitive movements, application of force. In addition, this procedure involves important forced and continuous posture of trunk flexion. These results indicated that with feasible ergonomic changes, the design of the equipment or the tasks and/or its planning, they could considerably improve the working conditions. Therefore, musculoskeletal disorders could reduce by implementing measures from the early engineering phase.

[1]  Matthew R. Hallowell,et al.  Leading or lagging? Temporal analysis of safety indicators on a large infrastructure construction project , 2017 .

[2]  Svetan Ratchev,et al.  Virtual Ergonomics and Time Optimization of a Railway Coach Assembly Line , 2012 .

[3]  M. Nakata,et al.  [Trends in research and prevention policies for work-related musculoskeletal disorders at the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA)]. , 2002, Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health.

[4]  G. R. J. Hockey,et al.  The railway as a socio-technical system: Human factors at the heart of successful rail engineering , 2007 .

[5]  B. Hutter Regulation and Risk: Occupational Health and Safety on the Railways , 2001 .

[6]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Proactive Construction Safety Control: Measuring, Monitoring, and Responding to Safety Leading Indicators , 2013 .

[7]  Wing Kong Chiu,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring in the Railway Industry: A Review , 2005 .

[8]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics: Salvendy/Handbook of Human Factors 4e , 2012 .

[9]  O Karhu,et al.  Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. , 1977, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero,et al.  Severity of electrical accidents in the construction industry in Spain. , 2014, Journal of safety research.

[11]  Gianluigi Mangia,et al.  Knowledge creation and inter-organizational relationships: the development of innovation in the railway industry , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[12]  Clifford F Bonnett Practical Railway Engineering , 2005 .

[13]  G. Athanassiou,et al.  A quantitative approach to assess upper limb fatigue in the work field , 2013 .

[14]  Hal W. Hendrick Ergonomics in organizational design and management , 1991 .

[15]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[16]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Leading indicators of construction safety performance , 2013 .

[17]  Laura Pickup,et al.  Safety culture in railway maintenance , 2005 .

[18]  Ryan L. Kift,et al.  Keeping track of railway safety and the mechanisms for risk , 2018, Safety Science.

[19]  Tak Wing Yiu,et al.  Developing Leading Indicators to Monitor the Safety Conditions of Construction Projects , 2016 .

[20]  Jörn Pachl,et al.  Railway Operation and Control , 2002 .