Budget Transparency for Monitoring Public Policies: Limits of Technology and Context

The purpose of this study was to develop a method to seek information for organization of civilian society to monitor public budgeting. To this end, a methodological approach based on Design Science Research through the building of artifacts was used, making theoretical and practical contributions to the field. The research question that guided the study was: how can a civil society organization monitor the achievement of public policy goals using information available on transparency websites? The objects of the study were the National Education Plan (NEP), which sets the goals for the development of education in Brazil, and the public budget of the federal government. By constructing the method, it was possible to deduce some aspects regarding the implications of transparency for the monitoring and projection of public policies. In the context in question, budget transparency was scarce on the websites. When monitoring is possible, society is interested in using budget transparency to project the enactment of a public policy rather than only monitor the past. A generalized method was proposed for monitoring public policies that enables this projection in the Brazilian context.

[1]  M. Merry.  Interest Group Activism on the Web: The Case of Environmental Organizations , 2011 .

[2]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[3]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  The perceived impacts of e-government on U.S. cities: A survey of Florida and Texas City managers , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Jeannine E. Relly,et al.  Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross-national study , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Democracy in an IT-framed society , 2001 .

[6]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[7]  A. Kakabadse,et al.  Reinventing the Democratic Governance Project through Information Technology? A Growing Agenda for Debate , 2003 .

[8]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  E-government around the world: lessons, challenges, and future directions , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[10]  Awdhesh K. Singh,et al.  Integrating Internet, telephones, and call centers for delivering better quality e-governance to all citizens , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[11]  Richard Heeks.  e-Government as a Carrier of Context , 2005, Journal of Public Policy.

[12]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Information systems in developing countries: a critical research review , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Bruce Bimber.  Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level , 2001 .

[14]  M. A. Cunha,et al.  O uso de TIC pelos governos: uma proposta de agenda de pesquisa a partir da produção acadêmica e da prática nacional , 2013 .

[15]  José Antonio Gomes de Pinho,et al.  Sociedade da informação, accountability e democracia delegativa: investigação em portais de governo no Brasil , 2002 .

[16]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Democracy in an IT-framed society: introduction , 2001, CACM.

[17]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  David Heald,et al.  Varieties of transparency , 2006 .

[19]  Heloisa Dias Bezerra.  Atores políticos, informação e democracia , 2008 .

[20]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  José Santo Dal Bem Pires,et al.  A EVOLUÇÃO HISTÓRICA DO ORÇAMENTO PÚBLICO E SUA IMPORTÂNCIA PARA A SOCIEDADE , 2006 .

[22]  Clay G. Wescott,et al.  E‐Government in the Asia‐pacific region , 2001 .

[23]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Nigel Cross.  An introduction to design methods , 1979 .