Computed tomography in clinical practice

Since it was first introduced three decades ago, computed tomography has become an important investigative tool. Conall Garvey and Rebecca Hanlon explain different types of scanners and what they are used for Computed tomography was first introduced 30 years ago and has since become an integral part of clinical practice.1 Because of rapid advances in technology few clinicians are aware of the scope and limitations of the different types of scanners. This review describes the three main types of computed tomographic scanner that are used in routine clinical practice and discusses their use in the investigation of a wide range of different conditions. It also flags up differing views on the relative merits of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. #### Summary points The role of “conventional” computed tomography is declining and has been superseded by spiral scanning Multislice scanning is faster and more versatile than spiral scanning and facilitates newer applications, particularly in vascular, cardiac, and colonic imaging Multislice computed tomography is expensive and has implications for workload and data storage Concern has been raised about the increasing radiation dose from examinations by computed tomography As magnetic resonance scanners become faster and availability increases, considerations of dose may relegate computed tomography to a secondary role for many applications The information contained in this review was gathered from several sources. These include many years of personal experience using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, discussions with manufacturers of equipment, and knowledge of radiation dosimetry issues, supported by a search of Medline and the Cochrane databases for systematic reviews comparing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. By today's standards early computed tomographic scanners were extremely slow and required enormous computer facilities to generate comparatively crude scans. Improvements in tube technology and computer hardware and software have shortened scan times and improved the resolution …

[1]  M. Budoff,et al.  Electron beam computed tomography: Screening for coronary artery disease , 1999, Clinical cardiology.

[2]  C H McCollough,et al.  CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  M. Reiser,et al.  Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. , 2000, Radiology.

[4]  G. Needham.  Making the best use of a department of clinical radiology--guidelines for doctors. , 1996, Health bulletin.

[5]  CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy) with Multidetector Computed Tomography — Preliminary Results , 2002 .

[6]  I H Kerr,et al.  Patient dose reduction in diagnostic radiology. , 1991, Clinical radiology.

[7]  W. Lees,et al.  Multi-slice technology in computed tomography. , 2001, Clinical radiology.

[8]  B. Thompson,et al.  Imaging of coronary artery calcification. Its importance in assessing atherosclerotic disease. , 1999, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[9]  L. Wagner.  CT fluoroscopy: another advancement with additional challenges in radiation management. , 2000, Radiology.

[10]  A. Leung,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography: historical perspective and new state-of-the-art using multi detector-row helical computed tomography. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  G. Hounsfield.  Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part I. Description of system. 1973. , 1973, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  K. Katada,et al.  Guidance with real-time CT fluoroscopy: early clinical experience. , 1996, Radiology.

[13]  S. Rabin,et al.  A pictorial review of coronary artery anatomy on spiral CT. , 2000, Chest.

[14]  M D Phillips,et al.  Multisection CT: scanning techniques and clinical applications. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  D. Vining.  Virtual colonoscopy. , 1999, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[16]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography: current and future status for colorectal cancer screening. , 2000, Seminars in roentgenology.

[17]  A L Oberg,et al.  Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. , 2001, Radiology.

[18]  S. Edyvean,et al.  CT scanner dosimetry. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  M. Lewis,et al.  Multislice CT: opportunities and challenges. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[20]  S. Kearney,et al.  Unravelling the helix--a physician's guide to spiral computed tomography. , 1998, Postgraduate medical journal.

[21]  G D Rubin,et al.  Multi-detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. , 2001, Radiology.