Post-Test Inspection of NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster Long-Duration Test Hardware: Discharge and Neutralizer Cathodes

The NEXT Long-Duration Test is part of a comprehensive thruster service life assessment intended to demonstrate overall throughput capability, validate service life models, quantify wear rates as a function of time and operating condition, and identify any unknown life-limiting mechanisms. The test was voluntarily terminated in February 2014 after demonstrating 51,184 hours of high-voltage operation, 918 kg of propellant throughput, and 35.5 MN-s of total impulse. The post-test inspection of the thruster hardware began shortly afterwards with a combination of non-destructive and destructive analysis techniques, and is presently nearing completion. This paper presents relevant results of the post-test inspection for both discharge and neutralizer cathodes. Discharge keeper erosion was found to be significantly reduced from what was observed in the NEXT 2 kh wear test and NSTAR Extended Life Test, providing adequate protection of vital cathode components throughout the test with ample lifetime remaining. The area of the discharge cathode orifice plate that was exposed by the keeper orifice exhibited net erosion, leading to cathode plate material building up in the cathode-keeper gap and causing a thermally-induced electrical short observed during the test. Significant erosion of the neutralizer cathode orifice was also found and is believed to be the root cause of an observed loss in flow margin. Deposition within the neutralizer keeper orifice as well as on the downstream surface was thicker than expected, potentially resulting in a facility-induced impact on the measured flow margin from plume mode. Neutralizer keeper wall erosion on the beam side was found to be significantly lower compared to the NEXT 2 kh wear test, likely due to the reduction in beam extraction diameter of the ion optics that resulted in decreased ion impingement. Results from the post-test inspection have led to some minor thruster design improvements.

[1]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Performance Characteristics of the NEXT Long-Duration Test After 16,550 h and 337 kg of Xenon Processed , 2009 .

[2]  Gary Wang,et al.  Vibration Test of a Breadboard Gimbal for the NEXT Ion Engine , 2006 .

[3]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Status of the NEXT Long-Duration Test After 23,300 Hours of Operation , 2009 .

[4]  John R. Brophy,et al.  Development and Testing of the Dawn Ion Propulsion System , 2006 .

[5]  Jonathan L. VanNoord,et al.  Lifetime Assessment of the NEXT Ion Thruster , 2010 .

[6]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Results of the 2000 hr Wear Test of the HiPEP Ion Thruster with Pyrolytic Graphite Ion Optics , 2006 .

[7]  George C. Soulas,et al.  Post-Test Inspection of NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster Long-Duration Test Hardware: Discharge Chamber , 2016 .

[8]  Daniel A. Herman,et al.  Application of the NEXT Ion Thruster Lifetime Assessment to Thruster Throttling , 2008 .

[9]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Long-Duration Test Neutralizer Performance and Erosion Characteristics , 2009 .

[10]  George C. Soulas,et al.  Post-Test Inspection of NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster Long Duration Test Hardware: Ion Optics , 2016 .

[11]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Prototype-Model NEXT Ion Thruster , 2007 .

[12]  Crispin Jenkinson,et al.  Development and Testing of the UK SF-12 , 1997 .

[13]  Michel Dubois,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the , 1995 .

[14]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Long-Duration Test Results , 2012 .

[15]  James S. Sovey,et al.  NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Component Verification Testing , 2008 .

[16]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Spatially-Resolved Beam Current and Charge-State Distributions for the NEXT Ion Engine , 2010 .

[17]  John Steven Snyder,et al.  Environmental Testing of the NEXT PM1 Ion Engine , 2013 .

[18]  James S. Sovey,et al.  NEXT PM1R Ion Thruster and Propellant Management System Wear Test Results , 2009 .

[19]  R. Spektor.  Characterization of the NASA NEXT Thruster , 2009 .

[20]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Status of NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Long-Duration Test as of 50,000 h and 900 kg Throughput , 2013 .

[21]  V. Rich.  Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[22]  Dan M. Goebel,et al.  Neutralizer hollow cathode simulations and comparisons with ground test data , 2009 .

[23]  Marc D. Rayman,et al.  In-Flight Operation of the Dawn Ion Propulsion System Through Early Orbit Operations at Ceres , 2015 .

[24]  Daniel A. Herman,et al.  NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Project Qualification Propellant Throughput Milestone: Performance, Erosion, and Thruster Service Life Prediction After 450 kg , 2010 .

[25]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  End-of-test Performance and Wear Characterization of NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Long-Duration Test , 2014 .

[26]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Thrust Stand Characterization of the NASA NEXT Thruster , 2010 .

[27]  Brian Wong,et al.  Performance of the NEXT Engineering Model Power Processing Unit , 2007 .

[28]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the NEXT Ion Engine , 2003 .

[29]  Marc D. Rayman,et al.  In-flight operation of the Dawn ion propulsion system through survey science orbit at Ceres , 2015 .

[30]  M. Rayman.  The successful conclusion of the Deep Space 1 Mission: important results without a flashy title , 2002 .

[31]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT: NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster , 2002 .

[32]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Thruster Performance Dispersion Analyses , 2007 .

[33]  Nicole J. Meckel,et al.  NEXT Ion Propulsion System Production Readiness , 2007 .

[34]  Daniel A. Herman.  Review of the NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Long-Duration Test as of 632 kg of Propellant Throughput , 2011 .

[35]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Single String Integration Test Results , 2009 .

[36]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Engine 2000 Hour Wear Test Results , 2004 .

[37]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Status of the Next Ion Thruster Long Duration Test , 2013 .

[38]  Daniel A. Herman.  Status of the NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Long-Duration Test After 30,352 Hours of Operation , 2010 .

[39]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Demonstration of the NSTAR ion propulsion system on the Deep Space One mission , 2001 .

[40]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Multi-Thruster Array Test - Engineering Demonstration , 2006 .

[41]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Performance Characteristics of the NEXT Long-Duration Test After 16,550 h of Operation and 337 kg of Xenon Processed , 2008 .

[42]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Long-Duration Test Plume and Wear Characteristics after 16,550 h of Operation and 337 kg of Xenon Processed , 2008 .

[43]  Andrew Hoskins,et al.  Development of a Prototype Model Ion Thruster for the NEXT System , 2004 .

[44]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (Next) Long-Duration Test as of 736 Kg of Propellant Throughput , 2013 .

[45]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Propulsion System Development Status and Performance , 2007 .

[46]  John R. Anderson,et al.  An overview of the results from an 8200 hour wear test of the NSTAR ion thruster , 1999 .

[47]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Status of the NEXT Ion Thruster Long-Duration Test After 10,100 hr and 207 kg Demonstrated , 2007 .