Viscoelasticity of human whole saliva collected after acid and mechanical stimulation.

The rheology of saliva is highly important due to its influence on oral health and physiochemical processes within the oral environment. While the rheology of human whole saliva (HWS) is considered important for its functionality, its measurement is often performed erroneously and/or limited to the viscosity at a single shear rate. To ensure accurate rheological measurements, it is necessary to test HWS immediately after expectoration and to apply a thin layer of surfactant solution around the rim of the rheometer plates so that protein adsorption is minimized at the air-liquid interface. It is shown for the first time that the viscosity and viscoelasticity of HWS depends greatly upon the method of stimulation. Mechanical action stimulates slightly shear-thinning and relatively inelastic saliva, while acidic solutions (e.g. 0.25% citric acid) stimulate secretion of saliva that is highly elastic and shear-thinning. However, both acidic solutions and mechanical action stimulate similar volumes of saliva. For acid-stimulated saliva, the ratio of the primary normal stress difference to the shear stress is of order 100 and the viscosity at high shear rates is only marginally above that of water. This extremely high stress ratio for such a low viscosity fluid indicates that saliva's elastic properties dominate its flow behavior and may assist in facilitating lubrication within the oral cavity. It is anticipated that the variation in saliva rheology arises because the individual glands secrete saliva of different rheology, with the proportion of saliva secreted from each gland depending on the method of stimulation. The steady-shear rheology and linear viscoelasticity of HWS are described reasonably well using a FENE-P constitutive model and a 3-mode Maxwell model respectively. These models indicate that there are several long relaxation modes within saliva, possibly arising from the presence of large flexible macromolecules such as mucin glycoproteins.

[1]  J. Meurman,et al.  Viscosity of whole saliva. , 1998, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[2]  A. N. Nieuw Amerongen,et al.  Rheological properties of commercially available polysaccharides with potential use in saliva substitutes. , 1994, Biorheology.

[3]  R. Bird.  Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids , 1977 .

[4]  A. Pedersen,et al.  Saliva and gastrointestinal functions of taste, mastication, swallowing and digestion. , 2002, Oral diseases.

[5]  J. Stokes.  Swirling flow of viscoelastic fluids , 1998 .

[6]  Gareth H. McKinley,et al.  Spiral instabilities in the flow of highly elastic fluids between rotating parallel disks , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  M. Navazesh,et al.  Methods for Collecting Saliva , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  U. Elofsson,et al.  Ellipsometry analysis of the in vitro adsorption of tea polyphenols onto salivary pellicles. , 2004, European journal of oral sciences.

[9]  Rama Bansil,et al.  Mucin structure, aggregation, physiological functions and biomedical applications , 2006 .

[10]  W. Schwarz.  The Rheology of Saliva , 1987 .

[11]  F. Bosman,et al.  The relation between saliva flow after different stimulations and the perception of flavor and texture attributes in custard desserts , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  D. Briedis,et al.  A study of the shear viscosity of human whole saliva , 1980 .

[13]  E. Veerman,et al.  Biochemical composition of human saliva in relation to other mucosal fluids. , 1995, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[14]  R. Larson.  Instabilities in viscoelastic flows , 1992 .

[15]  C. Dawes,et al.  A comparison of the effects of tasting and chewing foods on the flow rate of whole saliva in man. , 1988, Archives of oral biology.

[16]  F. Bosman,et al.  A comparison of the effects of added saliva, α-amylase and water on texture perception in semisolids , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[17]  M. Levine.  Salivary Macromolecules , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  G J Strous,et al.  Mucin-type glycoproteins. , 1992, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[19]  Mark W Rutland,et al.  Lubricating Properties of the Initial Salivary Pellicle — an AFM Study , 2003, Biofouling.

[20]  S. Humphrey,et al.  A review of saliva: normal composition, flow, and function. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  W. A. van der Reijden,et al.  Shear rate dependent viscoelastic behavior of human glandular salivas. , 1993, Biorheology.

[22]  R. Mukhopadhyay.  Devices to drool for. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[23]  E. J. 's-Gravenmade,et al.  Rheological properties of human saliva. , 1988, Archives of oral biology.

[24]  L. Tabak,et al.  Artificial Salivas: Present and Future , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[25]  K. Siebert,et al.  An alternate mechanism for the astringent sensation of acids , 2004 .

[26]  R. Kusy,et al.  Rheology of stimulated whole saliva in a typical pre-orthodontic sample population , 1995 .

[27]  M. Eisenburger,et al.  Relationship between enamel erosion and liquid flow rate. , 2005, European journal of oral sciences.

[28]  T. Arnebrant,et al.  Intraoral Lubrication of PRP-1, Statherin and Mucin as Studied by AFM , 2004, Biofouling.

[29]  C. Dawes,et al.  The effects of different foods and concentrations of citric acid on the flow rate of whole saliva in man. , 1988, Archives of oral biology.

[30]  M. Mackay,et al.  Estimates of apparent elongational viscosity using the fibre spinning and “pure” methods , 1989 .

[31]  S. Davis.  The rheological properties of saliva , 1971 .