Dynamic perspectives on social characteristics and sustainability in online community networks

Online community networks can help organizations improve collaboration. However, in spite of their potential value, there has been little empirical research into two important network factors that determine their success: social characteristics of users and changes in operations that result from network evolution. Our research addresses these deficiencies by using a cultural framework. Derived from anthropology, it extends previous system dynamics research on online community networks. The framework acts as a lens, enabling a better understanding of the effects that changes in these factors bring to online community networks. Using data collected from Wikipedia for model calibration, our findings suggest that, contrary to conventional wisdom, removing policies that focus on building group commitment does not lower performance. The results also show that online networks need structural control, otherwise their attractiveness, credibility and, subsequently, content value might all decrease. To ensure sustainability the network must be monitored, especially during the early stages of its evolution, so that rules and regulations that ensure value and validity can be selectively employed. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[2]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[3]  B. Wellman,et al.  Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO , 1981 .

[5]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[6]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  Discretionary Data Bases , 1987 .

[7]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[8]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[9]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[10]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[11]  J. Bloemhof-Ruwaard,et al.  ERIM R EPORT S ERIES R ESEARCH IN M ANAGEMENT , 2022 .

[12]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[13]  B. Cohen,et al.  Status processes in enduring work groups. , 1991 .

[14]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[15]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs Via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software , 2002 .

[16]  Utpal M. Dholakia,et al.  Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[17]  N. Lin.  Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[18]  A. Wildavsky,et al.  A CULTURAL THEORY OF INFORMATION BIAS IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1986 .

[19]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[20]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[21]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration , 1990, CSCW '88.

[22]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[23]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[24]  M. Douglas,et al.  Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. , 1970 .

[25]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[26]  Yaman Barlas,et al.  Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics , 1996 .

[27]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  Mark Thompson,et al.  Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of Practice , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[29]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[30]  Yehuda Baruch,et al.  Cultural Theory and Organizations: Analytical Method and Cases , 1998 .

[31]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[32]  Bin Gu,et al.  Online Discussion Boards for Technical Support: The Effect of Token Recognition on Customer Contributions , 2003, ICIS.

[33]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[34]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[35]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[36]  S. Sackmann.  Culture and Subcultures: An Analysis of Organizational Knowledge , 1992 .

[37]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.