Judgment and decision making: Behavioral approaches

The area of judgment and decision making has given rise to the study of many interesting phenomena, including reasoning fallacies, which are also of interest to behavior analysts. Indeed, techniques and principles of behavior analysis may be applied to study these fallacies. This article reviews research from a behavioral perspective that suggests that humans are not the information-seekers we sometimes suppose ourselves to be. Nor do we utilize information effectively when it is presented. This is shown from the results of research utilizing matching to sample and other behavioral tools (monetary reward, feedback, instructional control) to study phenomena such as the conjunction fallacy, base-rate neglect, and probability matching. Research from a behavioral perspective can complement research from other perspectives in furthering our understanding of judgment and decision making.

[1]  Alice R. Jwaideh,et al.  Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[3]  E. Fantino,et al.  Choice As A Function Of Reinforcement Ratios In Delayed Matching-to-sample. , 1996, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  James A. Kulik,et al.  The Conjunction Fallacy: Differential Incidence as a Function of Descriptive Frames and Educational Context , 1996 .

[5]  L. Humphreys Acquisition and extinction of verbal expectations in a situation analogous to conditioning. , 1939 .

[6]  E. Fantino,et al.  Human observing: Maintained by stimuli correlated with reinforcement but not extinction. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  E Fantino,et al.  Observing behavior in a computer game. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  N. Anderson Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[9]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  The conjunction fallacy: A test of averaging hypotheses , 1997 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgments of and by Representativeness , 1981 .

[11]  R. Boakes,et al.  Observing stimulus sources that signal food or no food. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  E. Fantino,et al.  THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF REASONING: A REVIEW OF GILOVICH'S HOW WE KNOW WHAT ISN'T SO1 , 1995 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Evidential impact of base rates , 1981 .

[14]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  The experimental analysis of behavior : a biological perspective , 1979 .

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[16]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Observing reward-informative and -uninformative stimuli by normal children of different ages ☆ , 1983 .

[17]  E Fantino,et al.  Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Human Obser Ving: Maintained by Nega Tive Informative Stimuli Only If Correlated with Improvement in Response Efficiency , 2022 .

[18]  Wyckoff Lb The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Part I. , 1952 .

[19]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error , 1996, Nature.

[20]  Humans’ responses to novel stimulus compounds and the effects of training , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  J. Dinsmoor Observing and conditioned reinforcement , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[22]  E. Fantino,et al.  Cognition and behavior analysis: a review of Rachlin's judgment, decision, and choice. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  T. Bloomfield Reinforcement Schedules: Contingency or Contiguity? , 1972 .

[24]  V. Smith Monetary Rewards and Decision Cost in Experimental Economics: An Extension , 1993 .

[25]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  An Experientially Derived Base-Rate Error in Humans , 1995 .