Kinetic analysis of lesions without mass effect on breast MRI using manual and computer-assisted methods

[1]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[2]  P. Lambin,et al.  SU‐GG‐I‐05: CT‐Perfusion and FDG‐PET Imaging in Rectal Cancer: New Insights into Tumor Vasculature , 2010 .

[3]  Matthias Benndorf,et al.  False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Matthias Dietzel,et al.  Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[6]  Hiroyuki Abe,et al.  DCEMRI of breast lesions: Is kinetic analysis equally effective for both mass and nonmass-like enhancement? , 2008, Medical physics.

[7]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. , 2007, Radiology.

[8]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Breast magnetic resonance imaging: principles and techniques. , 2007, Seminars in roentgenology.

[9]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Potential MRI interpretation model: differentiation of benign from malignant breast masses. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Joachim Boettcher,et al.  Further Signs in the Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Mammography: A Retrospective Study , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[11]  N. Hylton,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. , 2004, JAMA.

[12]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. , 2004, Radiology.

[13]  W. Kaiser,et al.  High grade and non-high grade ductal carcinoma in situ on dynamic MR mammography: characteristic findings for signal increase and morphological pattern of enhancement. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  P. Aspelin,et al.  Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions. , 2002, Acta radiologica.

[15]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast‐enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  D Hahn,et al.  Understanding Why Contrast Enhancement in Dynamic MRI Is Not Reproducible: Illustration with a Simple Phantom , 2001, The breast journal.

[17]  Lindsay W. Turnbull,et al.  Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Is Superior to Triple Assessment for the Pre-Operative Detection of Multifocal Breast Cancer , 1999, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[18]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[19]  P Aspelin,et al.  Sensitivity and Specificity of MR Mammography with Histopathological Correlation in 250 Breasts , 1996, Acta radiologica.

[20]  S. Edge,et al.  Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. , 1995, Radiology.

[21]  R. Gilles,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. , 1995, Radiology.

[22]  Anthony J. Guidi,et al.  Microvessel density and distribution in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.