Accuracy of rapid prototype models for head and neck reconstruction.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Rapid prototype (RP) models are used in craniofacial reconstructions; however, there are no standards or acceptable limits to ensure accuracy of the fabricated models. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of RP models by validating the accuracy of SLA skull models with a coordinate measurement device. MATERIAL AND METHODS Stainless steel spheres were located on a dry cadaver skull as fiducial markers, scanned with Multi Detector Computer Tomography (MDCT), and interpreted with software for rapid prototyping. Seven stereolithographic (SLA) models were fabricated and measured with a coordinate measurement device. An Euler rotation transformation calculation was applied to standardize the coordinate system between the control and the models. A paired standard t test (α=.05) was used to compare fiducial marker locations on SLA models with the control. RESULTS A significant difference was found between the control and each of the SLA models (P<.001) in the Z axis additive build. Significant dimensional differences were not consistently detected in the X and Y axes. Dimensional deviations fell within the size of the MDCT scans voxel dimensions. CONCLUSIONS The greatest discrepancies of medical model fabrication correspond to the largest dimension of the orthotropic voxel volume of the MDCT scan, which is related to the slice thickness of the scan and the Z axis of the RP model. However, the absolute magnitude of the error was small, well within the generally accepted tolerance for patient treatment.

[1]  Foroutan,et al.  Stereolithography: application to neurosurgery , 1998, Critical reviews in neurosurgery : CR.

[2]  P. M. Gronet,et al.  Preformed acrylic cranial implants using fused deposition modeling: a clinical report. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  C. Salgado,et al.  Linear and angular measurements of computer-generated models: Are they accurate, valid, and reliable? , 2007, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[4]  Erwin Keeve,et al.  Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[5]  J. Winder,et al.  Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery. , 2005, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[6]  T M Barker,et al.  Accuracy of stereolithographic models of human anatomy. , 1994, Australasian radiology.

[7]  J. Mühling,et al.  Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery--a review and an assessment of technology. , 2001, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  F Introna,et al.  Reverse engineering techniques applied to a human skull, for CAD 3D reconstruction and physical replication by rapid prototyping , 2006, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[9]  Lin Naing,et al.  Dimensional Accuracy of the Skull Models Produced by Rapid Prototyping Technology Using Stereolithography Apparatus , 2006 .

[10]  James D. Meadows.  Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing: Applications and Techniques for Use in Design: Manufacturing, and Inspection , 1995 .

[11]  John C Hunter,et al.  Linear and angular measurements of computer-generated models: are they accurate, valid, and reliable? , 2007, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[12]  M. Figl,et al.  Accuracy of Craniofacial Measurements: Computed Tomography and Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Compared With Stereolithographic Models , 2008, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.