Cerebral functional anatomy of voluntary contractions of ankle muscles in man

1 Cerebral activation elicited by right‐sided voluntary ankle muscle contraction was investigated by positron emission tomography measurements of regional cerebral blood flow. Two studies with eight subjects in each were carried out. Tonic isometric plantar and dorsiflexion and co‐contraction of the antagonist muscles were investigated in study 1. Tonic contraction was compared with dynamic ramp‐and‐hold contractions in study 2. 2 All types of contraction elicited activation of the left primary motor cortex (M1). The distance between the M1 peak activation locations for tonic isometric dorsi‐ and plantar flexion was 17 mm. Co‐contraction elicited activation of a larger area of M1 mainly located inbetween but partially overlapping the M1 areas activated during isolated dorsi‐/plantar flexion. 3 A voxel‐by‐voxel correlation analysis corrected for subject covariance showed for dorsiflexion a significant correlation between tibialis anterior EMG level and cerebral blood flow activation in the cerebellum and the M1 of the medial frontal cortex. For plantar flexion a significant correlation was found between soleus EMG and cerebral activation in the left medial S1 and M1, left thalamus and right cerebellum. 4 The activation during dynamic isotonic and isometric dorsi‐ and plantar flexion was significantly more extensive than during tonic contractions. In addition to M1, activation was seen in the contralateral supplementary motor area and bilaterally in the premotor and parietal cortices. Isotonic and isometric contractions did not differ except in a small area in the primary somatosensory cortex. 5 One possible explanation of the different cerebral activation during co‐contraction compared to that during plantar/dorsiflexion is that slightly different populations of cortical neurones are involved. The more extensive activation during dynamic compared with tonic contractions may reflect a larger cortical drive necessary to initiate and accelerate movements.

[1]  Y. Samson,et al.  Movement‐ and task‐related activations of motor cortical areas: A positron emission tomographic study , 1994, Annals of neurology.

[2]  E. Fetz,et al.  Functional relations between primate motor cortex cells and muscles: fixed and flexible. , 1987, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[3]  G. Deuschl,et al.  Task‐related changes in the effect of magnetic brain stimulation on spinal neurones in man. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  C. Capaday,et al.  Intracortical connections between motor cortical zones controlling antagonistic muscles in the cat: a combined anatomical and physiological study , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  A. M. Smith.  The coactivation of antagonist muscles. , 1981, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[6]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech responses: a positron emission tomography study. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Role of the human rostral supplementary motor area and the basal ganglia in motor sequence control: investigations with H2 15O PET. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  K Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT EXACT HR: Performance of a New High Resolution Positron Scanner , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  D. Siegmund,et al.  Testing for a Signal with Unknown Location and Scale in a Stationary Gaussian Random Field , 1995 .

[10]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Multiple nonprimary motor areas in the human cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  M. Torrens.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[14]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Anatomy of motor learning. II. Subcortical structures and learning by trial and error. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  P. Mazzone,et al.  Effects of voluntary contraction on descending volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation in conscious humans , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Multiple representations of body movements in mesial area 6 and the adjacent cingulate cortex: An intracortical microstimulation study in the macaque monkey , 1991, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  J. Nielsen,et al.  The regulation of presynaptic inhibition during co‐contraction of antagonistic muscles in man. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  H. Dr,et al.  Separate cortical systems for control of joint movement and joint stiffness: reciprocal activation and coactivation of antagonist muscles. , 1983 .

[19]  M. Mesulam.  A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[20]  J. Nielsen,et al.  The regulation of disynaptic reciprocal Ia inhibition during co‐contraction of antagonistic muscles in man. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  Albert Gjedde,et al.  Cortical Sites of Sustained and Divided Attention in Normal Elderly Humans , 1997, NeuroImage.

[22]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  J. B. Preston,et al.  Functional coupling between the pyramidal tract and segmental motoneurons in cat and primate. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  S. Lisberger,et al.  The Cerebellum: A Neuronal Learning Machine? , 1996, Science.

[25]  D. Humphrey,et al.  Separate cortical systems for control of joint movement and joint stiffness: reciprocal activation and coactivation of antagonist muscles. , 1983, Advances in neurology.

[26]  B. Gaymard,et al.  Effects of anterior cingulate cortex lesions on ocular saccades in humans , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  E. Fetz,et al.  Functional classes of primate corticomotoneuronal cells and their relation to active force. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  J. Hyvärinen,et al.  Effects of attention on multiunit responses to vibration in the somatosensory regions of the monkey's brain. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  M. Hallett,et al.  Cerebral Processes Related to Visuomotor Imagery and Generation of Simple Finger Movements Studied with Positron Emission Tomography , 1998, NeuroImage.

[30]  R. Passingham,et al.  Relation between cerebral activity and force in the motor areas of the human brain. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[32]  Anthony R. McIntosh,et al.  Task-Independent Effect of Time on rCBF , 1998, NeuroImage.

[33]  R. Passingham,et al.  Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.