Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation

The spread of online misinformation poses serious challenges to societies worldwide. In a novel attempt to address this issue, we designed a psychological intervention in the form of an online browser game. In the game, players take on the role of a fake news producer and learn to master six documented techniques commonly used in the production of misinformation: polarisation, invoking emotions, spreading conspiracy theories, trolling people online, deflecting blame, and impersonating fake accounts. The game draws on an inoculation metaphor, where preemptively exposing, warning, and familiarising people with the strategies used in the production of fake news helps confer cognitive immunity when exposed to real misinformation. We conducted a large-scale evaluation of the game with N = 15,000 participants in a pre-post gameplay design. We provide initial evidence that people’s ability to spot and resist misinformation improves after gameplay, irrespective of education, age, political ideology, and cognitive style.

[1]  Dolores Albarracín,et al.  Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation , 2017, Psychological science.

[2]  S. Linden,et al.  May 2017 Beating the Hell Out of Fake News , 2017 .

[3]  M. Kragh,et al.  Russia’s strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: the Swedish case , 2017 .

[4]  Mark D. Griffiths,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Trolling in Online Video Gaming , 2012, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[5]  M. Wood.  Rethinking the Inoculation Analogy: Effects on Subjects With Differing Preexisting Attitudes , 2007 .

[6]  Ludmilla A’Beckett.  Strategies to Discredit Opponents: Russian Presentations of Events in Countries of the Former Soviet Union , 2013 .

[7]  Sean Aday.  Leading the Charge: Media, Elites, and the Use of Emotion in Stimulating Rally Effects in Wartime , 2010 .

[8]  Juliane A. Lischka.  A Badge of Honor? , 2017 .

[9]  G. Carcelain,et al.  Therapeutic Vaccines for Chronic Infections , 2004, Science.

[10]  Josh Compton,et al.  Prophylactic Versus Therapeutic Inoculation Treatments for Resistance to Influence , 2020, Communication Theory.

[11]  Daniël Lakens,et al.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[12]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation Theory , 2010 .

[13]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The science of fake news , 2018, Science.

[14]  David C. Funder,et al.  Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense , 2019, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[15]  B. Nyhan,et al.  When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions , 2010 .

[16]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Examining the “Blanket of Protection” Conferred by Inoculation: The Effects of Inoculation Messages on the Cross-protection of Related Attitudes , 2016 .

[17]  S. Iyengar,et al.  The Strengthening of Partisan Affect , 2018 .

[18]  R. Spier,et al.  Fear, misinformation, and innumerates: how the Wakefield paper, the press, and advocacy groups damaged the public health. , 2010, Vaccine.

[19]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Inoculating against misinformation , 2017, Science.

[20]  W. Mcguire,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF FOREWARNING IN DEVELOPING RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION , 1962 .

[21]  A. Leiserowitz,et al.  Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change , 2017, Global challenges.

[22]  L. D'Ambrosio,et al.  Framing Emotional Response , 2004 .

[23]  James D. Ivory.  Still a Man's Game: Gender Representation in Online Reviews of Video Games , 2006 .

[24]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook , 2019, Science Advances.

[25]  David G. Rand,et al.  Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning , 2019, Cognition.

[26]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  The Doppelgänger Bot Attack: Exploring Identity Impersonation in Online Social Networks , 2015, Internet Measurement Conference.

[27]  Michel M. Haigh,et al.  Inoculation and Mental Processing: The Instrumental Role of Associative Networks in the Process of Resistance to Counterattitudinal Influence , 2005 .

[28]  F. Girandola,et al.  Priming Resistance to Persuasion decreases adherence to Conspiracy Theories* , 2018 .

[29]  Emily K. Vraga,et al.  In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media , 2015 .

[30]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Misinformation and Its Correction , 2012, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[31]  S. Frederick.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[32]  Soroush Vosoughi,et al.  Rumor Gauge , 2017, ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data.

[33]  U. Riebesell,et al.  Ocean acidification effects on mesozooplankton community development: Results from a long-term mesocosm experiment , 2017, PloS one.

[34]  S. van der Linden,et al.  The fake news game: actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation , 2019 .

[35]  Deborah I Thompson,et al.  Serious Video Games for Health: How Behavioral Science Guided the Development of a Serious Video Game , 2010, Simulation & gaming.

[36]  Douglas Walton.  Ad Hominem Arguments , 1998 .

[37]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence , 2017, PloS one.

[38]  Karen M. Douglas,et al.  Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti‐vaccine conspiracy theories , 2017 .

[39]  M. Reznik.  Identity Theft on Social Networking Sites: Developing Issues of Internet Impersonation , 2013 .

[40]  Ideological Polarization and the Media , 2014 .

[41]  De-legitimization of Media Mechanisms , 2007 .

[42]  Ricky J. Sethi.  Crowdsourcing the Verification of Fake News and Alternative Facts , 2017, HT.

[43]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Some Contemporary Approaches , 1964 .

[44]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election , 2017, First Monday.

[45]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[46]  Eric W. Groenendyk.  Competing Motives in a Polarized Electorate: Political Responsiveness, Identity Defensiveness, and the Rise of Partisan Antipathy , 2018 .

[47]  Griffiths,et al.  Adolescent trolling in online environments: a brief overview , 2014 .

[48]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and coping with the post-truth era , 2017 .

[49]  Samuel M. Aanestad,et al.  Where is the science? , 2000, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[50]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science , 2013, PloS one.

[51]  Sander van der Linden,et al.  The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance , 2015 .

[52]  Elly A. Konijn.  The role of emotion in media use and effects , 2012 .

[53]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[54]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization , 2017, ICWSM.

[55]  William J. McGuire,et al.  Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. , 1961 .

[56]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Adaptive Cluster Tendency Visualization and Anomaly Detection for Streaming Data , 2016, ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data.

[57]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Scientific communication in a post-truth society , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  G. D. Miller,et al.  Inducing Resistance to Conspiracy Theory Propaganda: Testing Inoculation and Metainoculation Strategies. , 2013 .

[59]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Emotional Dynamics in the Age of Misinformation , 2015, PloS one.

[60]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption , 2016 .

[61]  M. Prior,et al.  Media and Political Polarization , 2013 .

[62]  C. Sunstein,et al.  Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures* , 2009 .

[63]  J. Carlin,et al.  Beyond Power Calculations , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[64]  J. Dillard,et al.  The SAGE handbook of persuasion : developments in theory and practice , 2012 .

[65]  Toby Bolsen,et al.  Counteracting the Politicization of Science , 2015 .

[66]  Nathan Walter,et al.  How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation , 2018 .

[67]  Anthony McCosker,et al.  Trolling as provocation , 2014 .

[68]  D. Lazer,et al.  Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election , 2019, Science.