Prevalence of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar among residents of an urban slum area in Manila, Philippines as detected by the polymerase chain reaction.

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar infections among residents in BASECO compound, Manila, Philippines using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Formalin-ether concentration technique (FECT)-treated stool samples were examined under the light microscope to determine the presence of Entamoeba, helminths and other protozoan parasites. DNA was directly extracted from the FECT-treated samples and was subjected to PCR to determine E. histolytica and E. dispar infections. In this study, stool samples were collected from 2,232 residents of BASECO compound. Microscopic examination of FECT concentrated samples found 38 samples (1.703%) positive for E. histolytica/E. dispar. The E. histolytica/E. dispar microscopically positive samples were further analyzed by PCR and found 8 samples (0.358%) infected with E. histolytica and 23 samples (1.030%) infected with E. dispar. No statistically significant difference was observed in the sex distribution, while statistically significant difference was observed among the age group and area distribution of both the Entamoeba species. The results demonstrate PCR using DNA extracted from the formalin-fixed stools as an effective epidemiologic detection method of E. histolytica and E. dispar infections.

[1]  T. H. Nguyen,et al.  Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 , 2018, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[2]  Koji Watanabe,et al.  A Review of the Global Burden, New Diagnostics, and Current Therapeutics for Amebiasis , 2018, Open forum infectious diseases.

[3]  J. Ackers.  Book Review: Amebiasis. Biology and Pathogenesis of Entamoeba , 2016, Front. Microbiol..

[4]  R. Mahmud,et al.  Differentiating Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar and Entamoeba moshkovskii using nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in rural communities in Malaysia , 2012, Parasites & Vectors.

[5]  Alice Mannocci,et al.  The Mantel-Haenszel procedure. 50 years of the statistical method for confounders control , 2012 .

[6]  N. Hall,et al.  Host–Parasite interactions in Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar: what have we learned from their genomes? , 2012, Parasite immunology.

[7]  W. Rivera,et al.  Genotyping of Giardia duodenalis isolates among residents of slum area in Manila, Philippines , 2007, Parasitology Research.

[8]  H. Kong,et al.  Infection status of intestinal parasites in children living in residential institutions in Metro Manila, the Philippines. , 2004, The Korean journal of parasitology.

[9]  W. Rivera,et al.  Field study on the distribution of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in the northern Philippines as detected by the polymerase chain reaction. , 1998, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[10]  Entamoeba taxonomy. , 1997, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[11]  W. Rivera,et al.  Differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar DNA from cysts present in stool specimens by polymerase chain reaction: its field application in the Philippines , 1996, Parasitology Research.

[12]  S. Kobayashi,et al.  Distinguishing pathogenic isolates of Entamoeba histolytica by polymerase chain reaction. , 1991, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[13]  C. Auer.  Health status of children living in a squatter area of Manila, Philippines, with particular emphasis on intestinal parasitoses. , 1990, The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health.