Research challenges and needs for the deployment of wind energy in hilly and mountainous regions

Abstract. The continuing transition to renewable energy will require more wind turbines to be installed and operated on land and offshore. On land, wind turbines will increasingly be deployed in hilly or mountainous regions, which are often described together as “complex terrain” in the wind energy industry. These areas can experience complex flows that are hard to model, as well as cold climate conditions that lead to instrument and blade icing and can further impact wind turbine operation. This paper – a collaboration between several International Energy Agency (IEA) Wind Tasks and research groups based in mountainous countries – sets out the research and development needed to improve the financial competitiveness and ease of integration of wind energy in hilly or mountainous regions. The focus of the paper is on the interaction between the atmosphere, terrain, land cover, and wind turbines, during all stages of a project life cycle. The key needs include collaborative research and development facilities, improved wind and weather models that can cope with mountainous terrain, frameworks for sharing data, and a common, quantitative definition of site complexity. Addressing these needs will be essential for the affordable and reliable large-scale deployment of wind energy in many countries across the globe. Because of the widespread nature of complex flow and icing conditions, addressing these challenges will have positive impacts on the risk and cost of energy from wind energy globally.

[1]  S. Emeis,et al.  The five main influencing factors for lidar errors in complex terrain , 2022, Wind Energy Science.

[2]  F. Hammer,et al.  Improving Site-Dependent Wind Turbine Performance Prediction Accuracy Using Machine Learning , 2022, ASCE-ASME J Risk and Uncert in Engrg Sys Part B Mech Engrg.

[3]  S. Davis,et al.  Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide , 2021, Nature Communications.

[4]  P. Sagaut,et al.  ProLB: A Lattice Boltzmann Solver of Large‐Eddy Simulation for Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows , 2021, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[5]  T. Aoki,et al.  Real-Time Tracer Dispersion Simulations in Oklahoma City Using the Locally Mesh-Refined Lattice Boltzmann Method , 2021, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[6]  H. Bergström,et al.  Probabilistic Forecasting of Wind Turbine Icing Related Production Losses Using Quantile Regression Forests , 2020, Energies.

[7]  C. Voigt,et al.  The human dimensions of a green–green-dilemma:​ Lessons learned from the wind energy — wildlife conflict in Germany , 2020, Energy Reports.

[8]  M. Dorninger,et al.  Skill and Potential Economic Value of Forecasts of Ice Accretion on Wind Turbines , 2020, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology.

[9]  R. Barthelmie,et al.  Climate change impacts on wind power generation , 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment.

[10]  P. Cheng,et al.  ANDroMeDA - A Novel Flying Wind Measurement System , 2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[11]  S. Barber,et al.  Actual Total Cost reduction of commercial CFD modelling tools for Wind Resource Assessment in complex terrain , 2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[12]  H. Nordborg,et al.  Improving site-dependent power curve prediction accuracy using regression trees , 2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[13]  S Barber,et al.  IEA Wind Task 31: Design of a new comparison metrics simulation challenge for wind resource assessment in complex terrain Stage 1 , 2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[14]  Taeseong Kim,et al.  Development of an icing simulation code for rotating wind turbines , 2020 .

[15]  J. Mann,et al.  Cross-contamination effect on turbulence spectra from Doppler beam swinging wind lidar , 2020 .

[16]  Tyler M. Bell,et al.  Analysis of flow in complex terrain using multi-Doppler lidar retrievals , 2020 .

[17]  Kristy L. Hansen,et al.  Recent Advances in Wind Turbine Noise Research , 2020, Acoustics.

[18]  N. Vasiljević,et al.  Wind sensing with drone-mounted wind lidars: proof of concept , 2020 .

[19]  Joseph C. y. Lee,et al.  The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods , 2020 .

[20]  S. Barber,et al.  Evaluation of the lattice Boltzmann method for wind modelling in complex terrain , 2020, Wind Energy Science.

[21]  Andrea Vignaroli,et al.  Digitalization of scanning lidar measurement campaign planning , 2020 .

[22]  R. Barthelmie,et al.  Modelling Hail and Convective storms with WRF for Wind Energy Applications , 2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[23]  R. Kilpatrick,et al.  Advances in wind power forecasting and power loss mitigation for cold climate operation , 2020, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[24]  B. Witha,et al.  Low Level Jets over the Southern North Sea , 2019, Meteorologische Zeitschrift.

[25]  J. Mann,et al.  Multi-lidar wind resource mapping in complex terrain , 2019, Wind Energy Science.

[26]  Martin Hofsäß,et al.  Flying UltraSonic – A new way to measure the wind , 2019 .

[27]  J. Mann,et al.  Cross-contamination effect on turbulence spectra from Doppler beam swinging wind lidar , 2019 .

[28]  J. Peinke,et al.  Grand challenges in the science of wind energy , 2019, Science.

[29]  C. Draxl,et al.  The Second Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP2): General Overview , 2019, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[30]  J. Lemay,et al.  Field analysis, modeling and characterization of wind turbine hot air ice protection systems , 2019, Cold Regions Science and Technology.

[31]  L. Sethuraman,et al.  IEA Wind TCP Task 37: Systems Engineering in Wind Energy - WP2.1 Reference Wind Turbines , 2019 .

[32]  Martin Schön,et al.  The Multi-Purpose Airborne Sensor Carrier MASC-3 for Wind and Turbulence Measurements in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 2019, Sensors.

[33]  Fernando Porté-Agel,et al.  Wind Energy Prediction in Highly Complex Terrain by Computational Fluid Dynamics , 2019, Energies.

[34]  Anton Kaifel,et al.  Minute-Scale Forecasting of Wind Power—Results from the Collaborative Workshop of IEA Wind Task 32 and 36 , 2019, Energies.

[35]  H. Holttinen Wind Integration , 2019, Advances in Energy Systems.

[36]  K. Hansen,et al.  Does the wind turbine wake follow the topography? A multi-lidar study in complex terrain , 2018 .

[37]  Po Wen Cheng,et al.  Reducing the Uncertainty of Lidar Measurements in Complex Terrain Using a Linear Model Approach , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[38]  Nigel Swytink-Binnema,et al.  Detecting instrumental icing using automated double anemometry , 2018, Wind Energy.

[39]  D. Wright,et al.  A New High-Resolution Map of World Mountains and an Online Tool for Visualizing and Comparing Characterizations of Global Mountain Distributions , 2018, Mountain Research and Development.

[40]  Stephan Rasp,et al.  Neural networks for post-processing ensemble weather forecasts , 2018, Monthly Weather Review.

[41]  Bri-Mathias Hodge,et al.  Wind and solar resource data sets , 2018 .

[42]  Emmanouil N. Anagnostou,et al.  Object-Based Analog Forecasts for Surface Wind Speed , 2017 .

[43]  Charlie Frye,et al.  Modeling global Hammond landform regions from 250‐m elevation data , 2017, Trans. GIS.

[44]  Luís Frölén Ribeiro,et al.  Perdigão 2015: methodology for atmospheric multi-Doppler lidar experiments , 2017 .

[45]  H. Hangan,et al.  For wind turbines in complex terrain, the devil is in the detail , 2017 .

[46]  J. Lundquist,et al.  Three-Dimensional Structure of Wind Turbine Wakes as Measured by Scanning Lidar , 2017 .

[47]  David Schlipf,et al.  Wind field reconstruction from nacelle-mounted lidar short-range measurements , 2017 .

[48]  J. Mann,et al.  Complex terrain experiments in the New European Wind Atlas , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[49]  Kurt Schaldemose Hansen,et al.  Mesoscale to microscale wind farm flow modeling and evaluation , 2017 .

[50]  Jennifer F. Newman,et al.  An Error Reduction Algorithm to Improve Lidar Turbulence Estimates for Wind Energy , 2016 .

[51]  Bret W. Butler,et al.  Downscaling surface wind predictions from numerical weather prediction models in complex terrain with WindNinja , 2016 .

[52]  Aaron D. Smith,et al.  Wind Plant Preconstruction Energy Estimates. Current Practice and Opportunities , 2016 .

[53]  David Infield,et al.  Mapping hail meteorological observations for prediction of erosion in wind turbines , 2016 .

[54]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  Long-term research challenges in wind energy – a research agenda by the European Academy of Wind Energy , 2016 .

[55]  Stefan Emeis,et al.  Remote sensing winds in complex terrain – a review , 2015 .

[56]  Larry K. Berg,et al.  The Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP): A Public–Private Partnership Addressing Wind Energy Forecast Needs , 2015 .

[57]  Bri-Mathias Hodge,et al.  The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit , 2015 .

[58]  J. Lundquist,et al.  Observing and Simulating the Summertime Low-Level Jet in Central Iowa , 2015 .

[59]  Michael Lehning,et al.  Effect of winds in a mountain pass on turbine performance , 2014 .

[60]  Stefan Emeis,et al.  Wind speed and shear associated with low-level jets over Northern Germany , 2014 .

[61]  Emil Hedevang,et al.  Wind turbine power curves incorporating turbulence intensity , 2014 .

[62]  P. Bechtold,et al.  Why is it so difficult to represent stably stratified conditions in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models? , 2013 .

[63]  Paul Fleming,et al.  Using machine learning to predict wind turbine power output , 2013 .

[64]  Christoph Knigge,et al.  Scopes and Challenges of Dual-Doppler Lidar Wind Measurements—An Error Analysis , 2013 .

[65]  Günther Zängl,et al.  Extending the Numerical Stability Limit of Terrain-Following Coordinate Models over Steep Slopes , 2012 .

[66]  J. Lundquist,et al.  The modification of wind turbine performance by statistically distinct atmospheric regimes , 2012 .

[67]  Rozenn Wagner,et al.  Accounting for the speed shear in wind turbine power performance measurement , 2011 .

[68]  H. Jørgensen,et al.  The Bolund Experiment, Part I: Flow Over a Steep, Three-Dimensional Hill , 2011 .

[69]  Julia Gottschall,et al.  Can wind lidars measure turbulence , 2011 .

[70]  J. Lundquist,et al.  Atmospheric stability affects wind turbine power collection , 2011 .

[71]  Ian S. Dunn,et al.  Exploring the Limits , 2009 .

[72]  Ioannis Antoniou,et al.  Wind Shear and Uncertainties in Power Curve Measurement and Wind Resources , 2009 .

[73]  J. Mann,et al.  Conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain , 2009 .

[74]  E. Morfiadakis,et al.  Effects of Turbulence and Flow Inclination on the Performance of Cup Anemometers in the Field , 2001 .

[75]  RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY FORECASTING SOLUTIONS , 2022 .

[76]  Johannes Pohl,et al.  Monitoring annoyance and stress effects of wind turbines on nearby residents: A comparison of U.S. and European samples. , 2019, Environment international.

[77]  G. Thompson High Resolution Numerical Weather Model Forecasts of Icing at the Ground and in the Air , 2019 .

[78]  Tyler M. Bell,et al.  Analysis of flow in complex terrain using multi-Doppler lidar retrievals , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[79]  Johannes Pohl,et al.  Understanding stress effects of wind turbine noise – The integrated approach , 2018 .

[80]  A. Bechmann Data Requirements for WAsP, CFD & WRF , 2017 .

[81]  Devis Tuia,et al.  Learning wind fields with multiple kernels , 2011 .

[82]  Hans Ejsing Jørgensen,et al.  Comparison of resource and energy yield assessment procedures , 2011 .

[83]  Troels Friis Pedersen,et al.  Development of a Classification System for Cup Anemometers - CLASSCUP , 2003 .

[84]  N. Mortensen,et al.  Exploring the limits of WAsP the wind atlas analysis and application program , 1996 .