A note on the direct democracy deficit in two-tier voting

A large population of voters with single-peaked preferences are partitioned into disjoint constituencies. Collective decisions are taken by their representatives, one from each constituency, according to a weighted voting rule. It is assumed that each representative’s ideal point perfectly matches that of the respective constituency median and that top-tier decisions are in the voting game’s core. The resulting representative-democratic voting outcomes generally differ from those of a direct-democratic, single-tier system. The expected discrepancy varies with the voting weight allocation. It is minimized by weights proportional to constituency population sizes only if citizens differ sufficiently more between than within constituencies. Weights proportional to the square root of population sizes perform better if all citizens have independent and identically distributed ideal points.

[1]  Seok-ju Cho,et al.  Bargaining foundations of the median voter theorem , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.

[2]  Iris Bohnet,et al.  Direct‐Democratic Rules: The Role of Discussion , 1994 .

[3]  Elisabeth R. Gerber,et al.  Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Serguei Kaniovski,et al.  The exact bias of the Banzhaf measure of power when votes are neither equiprobable nor independent , 2008, Soc. Choice Welf..

[5]  Dan S. Felsenthal,et al.  Minimizing the mean majority deficit: The second square-root rule , 1999 .

[6]  Annick Laruelle,et al.  Bargaining in Committees of Representatives , 2008 .

[7]  Jean-François Laslier,et al.  Optimal Apportionment , 2013, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  H. Cramér Mathematical methods of statistics , 1947 .

[9]  Hannu Nurmi,et al.  Rational Behaviour and the Design of Institutions , 1998 .

[10]  L. Penrose The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting , 1946 .

[11]  Lars P. Feld,et al.  The Role of Direct Democracy in the European Union , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  Dominique Lepelley,et al.  Three ways to compute accurately the probability of the referendum paradox , 2011, Math. Soc. Sci..

[13]  Alois Stutzer,et al.  Direct Democracy: Designing a Living Constitution , 2003 .

[14]  B. Arnold,et al.  A first course in order statistics , 2008 .

[15]  Stephan Hartmann,et al.  A Utilitarian Assessment of Alternative Decision Rules in the Council of Ministers , 2005 .

[16]  Kenneth A. Shepsle,et al.  The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Stefan Napel,et al.  The Inter-Institutional Distribution of Power in EU Codecision , 2004, Soc. Choice Welf..

[18]  D. Felsenthal,et al.  The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes , 1998 .

[19]  Dahl,et al.  A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participation , 1994 .

[20]  H. Rieder Robust asymptotic statistics , 1994 .

[21]  Salvador Barberà,et al.  On the Weights of Nations: Assigning Voting Weights in a Heterogeneous Union , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  Luc Bovens,et al.  Welfarist evaluations of decision rules for boards of representatives , 2007, Soc. Choice Welf..

[23]  Sascha Kurz,et al.  On the Egalitarian Weights of Nations , 2012, ArXiv.

[24]  Neil C. Schwertman,et al.  A Simple Noncalculus Proof That the Median Minimizes the Sum of the Absolute Deviations , 1990 .

[25]  Nicola Maaser,et al.  Equal representation in two-tier voting systems , 2007, Soc. Choice Welf..

[26]  Voting Power in the EU Council of Ministers and Fair Decision Making in Distributive Politics , 2012 .

[27]  H. Nurmi Voting paradoxes and referenda , 1998 .

[28]  Dominique Lepelley,et al.  Majority Efficient Representation of the Citizens in a Federal Union , 2020, Studies in Choice and Welfare.

[29]  B. Arnold,et al.  A first course in order statistics , 1994 .

[30]  Werner Kirsch,et al.  On Penrose’s Square-Root Law and Beyond , 2006, math/0611418.

[31]  Jonathan N. Katz,et al.  The Mathematics and Statistics of Voting Power , 2002 .

[32]  J. Banks,et al.  A Bargaining Model of Collective Choice , 2000, American Political Science Review.