Evaluation of vehicle interior head impacts for the forensic analysis of MAIS head injury risk

In the field of forensic collision reconstruction, in order to analyze the vehicular/mechanical component(s) of a dynamic impact, the overall severity of the crash event is typically assessed by quantifying the change in velocity (Delta V) of the vehicle and/or the occupant. Often, in a vehicle impact, there is forensic evidence present on the vehicle interior to indicate the location of a head-to-component impact. If a head injury has occurred as a result of the impact, there is often an inquiry made regarding the likely vehicle impact velocity required to produce a specific head injury. The “Head Injury Criterion” (HIC) is a widely-used parameter related to the physiology of brain injury risk. Unfortunately, physical laboratory testing for the forensic calculation of an impact-specific HIC value is often not feasible. In order to forensically evaluate contributing factors and mitigation for a real-world head-to-surface impact, an assessment of the impacted surface characteristics is paradigm. Subsequent to the introduction of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) 201 for head impact protection in vehicle interior impacts, vehicles have been designed with safety features to minimize head injury risk. However, vehicles manufactured prior to FMVSS 201 have interior structures which may be harmful if impacted at relatively low impact speeds. This paper provides thorough documentation of data associated with varying head-to-surface vehicle interior impacts. This study attempts to quantify the injury likelihood for individual interior impact observed in laboratory experiments so that values can be applied when forensically investigating impacts in the real world.

[1]  C Z Cory,et al.  Development of a simulation system for performing in situ surface tests to assess the potential severity of head impacts from alleged childhood short falls. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[2]  N. Millsa,et al.  FEA of oblique impact tests on a motorcycle helmet , 2009 .

[3]  J Ozanne-Smith,et al.  Comparative performance of playground surfacing materials including conditions of extreme non-compliance , 2004, Injury Prevention.

[4]  Praveen K. Pinnoji,et al.  Finite element modelling of helmeted head impact under frontal loading , 2007 .

[5]  G. W. Nyquist,et al.  Analytical Studies of the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) , 1974 .

[6]  V L Roberts,et al.  Tolerance curves of acceleration and intracranial pressure and protective index in experimental head injury. , 1966, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  Dot Hs,et al.  HIC Test Results before and after the 1999-2003 Head Impact Upgrade of FMVSS 201 , 2006 .

[8]  Peter Halldin,et al.  A new oblique impact test for motorcycle helmets , 2001 .

[9]  A. Afshari FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATIONS INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF THE HELMET IN REDUCING HEAD INJURIES , 2008 .

[10]  N. J. Mills,et al.  Design of foam crash mats for head impact protection , 2001 .

[11]  Erik G. Takhounts,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF IMPROVED INJURY CRITERIA FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE RESTRAINT SYSTEMS - II , 1999 .

[12]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  Finite-element analysis of bicycle helmet oblique impacts , 2008 .

[13]  William R. S. Fan The role of skull fractures in short duration head impacts , 1987 .

[14]  V. R. Hodgson,et al.  Effect of Long-Duration Impact on Head , 1972 .

[15]  John W. Melvin,et al.  Head Impact Response , 1977 .

[16]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Optimal impact isolation for injury prevention evaluated by the head injury criterion , 2007 .

[17]  P. Atkinson,et al.  A Methodology for Measurement and Analysis of Head-To- B-Pillar Contact Pressure and Area Response , 2001 .

[18]  Brenda J Shields,et al.  The potential for brain injury on selected surfaces used by cheerleaders. , 2009, Journal of athletic training.

[19]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  Oblique impact testing of bicycle helmets , 2008 .

[20]  Lokeswarappa R. Dharani,et al.  DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF NORMAL IMPACT OF OCCUPANT HEAD ON LAMINATED GLASS , 1998 .

[21]  P. Theobald,et al.  The predicted risk of head injury from fall-related impacts on to third-generation artificial turf and grass soccer surfaces: A comparative biomechanical analysis , 2010, Sports biomechanics.

[22]  A S McIntosh,et al.  Evaluation of cricket helmet performance and comparison with baseball and ice hockey helmets , 2003, British journal of sports medicine.

[23]  J. J. Swearingen,et al.  Tolerances of the human face to crash impact. , 1965 .

[24]  Robert Haas,et al.  Testing impact attenuation on California playground surfaces made of recycled tires , 2007, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.