Connecting MPAs – eight challenges for science and management

* Connectivity is a crucial process underpinning the persistence, recovery, and productivity of marine ecosystems. The Convention on Biological Diversity, through the Aichi Target 11, has set the ambitious objective of implementing a ‘well connected system of protected areas’ by 2020. * This paper identifies eight challenges toward the integration of connectivity into MPA network management and planning. A summary table lists the main recommendations in terms of method, tool, advice, or action to address each of these challenges. Authors belong to a science–management continuum including researchers, international NGO officers, and national MPA agency members. * Three knowledge challenges are addressed: selecting and integrating connectivity measurement metrics; assessing the accuracy and uncertainty of connectivity measurements; and communicating and visualizing connectivity measurements. * Three management challenges are described: integrating connectivity into the planning and management of MPA networks; setting quantitative connectivity targets; and implementing connectivity-based management across scales and marine jurisdictions. * Finally, two paths toward a better integration of connectivity science with MPA management are proposed: setting management-driven priorities for connectivity research, bridging connectivity science, and MPA network management. * There is no single method to integrate connectivity into marine spatial planning. Rather, an array of methods can be assembled according to the MPA network objectives, budget, available skills, data, and timeframe. * Overall, setting up ‘boundary organizations’ should be promoted to organize complex cross-disciplinary, cross-sectoral and cross-jurisdiction interactions that are needed between scientists, managers, stakeholders and decision-makers to make informed decision regarding connectivity-based MPA planning and management. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  John L. Largier,et al.  CONSIDERATIONS IN ESTIMATING LARVAL DISPERSAL DISTANCES FROM OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA , 2003 .

[2]  K. E. Steele,et al.  REVIEW PAPER , 2010, Veterinary pathology.

[3]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Dispersal connectivity and reserve selection for marine conservation , 2011 .

[4]  B. Crona,et al.  Learning in Support of Governance: Theories, Methods, and a Framework to Assess How Bridging Organizations Contribute to Adaptive Resource Governance , 2012 .

[5]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Long-term persistence of species and the SLOSS problem. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: A spatially explicit model applied to butterflies , 1994 .

[7]  Patrick N. Halpin,et al.  Modeling population connectivity by ocean currents, a graph-theoretic approach for marine conservation , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  Andrew Fall,et al.  Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: A guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation , 2011 .

[9]  Hugh Sweatman,et al.  Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: A globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  J. Stachowicz.  Mutualism, Facilitation, and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 2001 .

[11]  R. Steneck,et al.  Larval retention and connectivity among populations of corals and reef fishes: history, advances and challenges , 2009, Coral Reefs.

[12]  J. Kool,et al.  Population connectivity: recent advances and new perspectives , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[13]  Elizabeth A. Moffitt,et al.  The utility and limitations of size and spacing guidelines for designing marine protected area (MPA) networks , 2011 .

[14]  D. Heath,et al.  Local retention, dispersal and fluctuating connectivity among populations of a coral reef fish , 2011, Oecologia.

[15]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  A. Hastings,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics and Genetics , 1994 .

[17]  F. Allendorf,et al.  What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[18]  D. Legrand,et al.  Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[19]  David M. Kaplan,et al.  Global implementation of marine protected areas: Is the developing world being left behind? , 2012 .

[20]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Scale and Cross-scale Dynamics Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World , 2006 .

[21]  L. D. Brown,et al.  Bridging Organizations and Sustainable Development , 1991 .

[22]  Stephanie Manel,et al.  Assignment methods: matching biological questions with appropriate techniques. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara,et al.  Mind the gap: Addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning , 2011 .

[24]  S. Josey.  Climate change impacts , 2012 .

[25]  Natalie C. Ban,et al.  Systematic marine conservation planning in data-poor regions: Socioeconomic data is essential , 2009 .

[26]  M. Coleman,et al.  Connectivity within and among a Network of Temperate Marine Reserves , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  G. Jones,et al.  Local Replenishment of Coral Reef Fish Populations in a Marine Reserve , 2007, Science.

[28]  J. Hare,et al.  Transgenerational marking of embryonic otoliths in marine fishes using barium stable isotopes , 2006 .

[29]  Taku Kadoya,et al.  Assessing functional connectivity using empirical data , 2008, Population Ecology.

[30]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Social learning: a knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes , 2011 .

[31]  V. Eguíluz,et al.  Network analysis identifies weak and strong links in a metapopulation system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Kimberly A. Selkoe,et al.  Evolving coral reef conservation with genetic information , 2014 .

[33]  Yanli Jia,et al.  Larval Connectivity in an Effective Network of Marine Protected Areas , 2010, PloS one.

[34]  Carl G. Meyer,et al.  Differential movement patterns and site fidelity among trophic groups of reef fishes in a Hawaiian marine protected area , 2010 .

[35]  Glen Gawarkiewicz,et al.  Population connectivity in marine systems : an overview , 2007 .

[36]  Claire B Paris-Limouzy,et al.  Connectivity and resilience of coral reef metapopulations in marine protected areas: matching empirical efforts to predictive needs , 2009, Coral Reefs.

[37]  M. Zacharias,et al.  Marine Conservation Ecology , 2011 .

[38]  P. Sale,et al.  Metapopulation ecology in the sea: from Levins' model to marine ecology and fisheries science , 2004 .

[39]  Jason J. Roberts,et al.  Validation of a fish larvae dispersal model with otolith data in the Western Indian Ocean and implications for marine spatial planning in data-poor regions , 2013 .

[40]  Kristina D. Rothley,et al.  Working backwards to move forwards: Graph-based connectivity metrics for reserve network selection , 2005 .

[41]  J. Leis.  Behaviour as input for modelling dispersal of fish larvae: behaviour, biogeography, hydrodynamics, ontogeny, physiology and phylogeny meet hydrography , 2007 .

[42]  David M. Kaplan,et al.  Consequences of adult and juvenile movement for marine protected areas , 2011 .

[43]  Mark H. Carr,et al.  PROPAGULE DISPERSAL DISTANCE AND THE SIZE AND SPACING OF MARINE RESERVES , 2003 .

[44]  K. Sherman.  Adaptive management institutions at the regional level: The case of Large Marine Ecosystems , 2014 .

[45]  Patrick N. Halpin,et al.  Marine population connectivity identifies ecological neighbors for conservation planning in the Coral Triangle , 2012 .

[46]  Botsford,et al.  Dependence of sustainability on the configuration of marine reserves and larval dispersal distance , 2001 .

[47]  J. Orestes Cerdeira,et al.  Connectivity in priority area selection for conservation , 2005 .

[48]  LehtomäkiJoona,et al.  Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation , 2013 .

[49]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Identifying spatial components of ecological and evolutionary processes for regional conservation planning in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa , 2003 .

[50]  Sahotra Sarkar,et al.  LQGraph: A software package for optimizing connectivity in conservation planning , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[51]  Dan Laffoley,et al.  Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning , 2008 .

[52]  G. Jones,et al.  Coral Reef Fish Larvae Settle Close to Home , 2005, Current Biology.

[53]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization , 2009 .

[54]  R. L. Pressey,et al.  Connectivity, biodiversity conservation and the design of marine reserve networks for coral reefs , 2009, Coral Reefs.

[55]  F. Guichard,et al.  Connectivity as a Management Tool for Coastal Ecosystems in Changing Oceans , 2012 .

[56]  L. McCook,et al.  Recasting shortfalls of marine protected areas as opportunities through adaptive management , 2012 .

[57]  Karin Frank,et al.  A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[58]  S. Manel,et al.  Low Connectivity between Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas: A Biophysical Modeling Approach for the Dusky Grouper Epinephelus marginatus , 2013, PloS one.

[59]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Six Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[60]  S. Planes,et al.  Estimating connectivity in marine populations: an empirical evaluation of assignment tests and parentage analysis under different gene flow scenarios , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[61]  David A Siegel,et al.  Identifying critical regions in small-world marine metapopulations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Peter J Mumby,et al.  Reserve design for uncertain responses of coral reefs to climate change. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[63]  J. Bruno,et al.  Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory , 2003 .

[64]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Extending networks of protected areas to optimize connectivity and population growth rate , 2015 .

[65]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  On the limitations of graph‐theoretic connectivity in spatial ecology and conservation , 2011 .

[66]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[67]  R. Pressey,et al.  Designing Marine Reserves for Fisheries Management, Biodiversity Conservation, and Climate Change Adaptation , 2014 .

[68]  Emily Nicholson,et al.  Conservation prioritization using metapopulation models , 2009 .

[69]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity , 2004, Nature.

[70]  A. Magurran,et al.  Biological diversity : the coexistence of species on changing landscapes , 1994 .

[71]  S. Somot,et al.  Additive effects of climate change on connectivity between marine protected areas and larval supply to fished areas , 2015 .

[72]  Martin Nilsson Jacobi,et al.  Optimal networks of nature reserves can be found through eigenvalue perturbation theory of the connectivity matrix. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[73]  E. Ser-Giacomi,et al.  Hydrodynamic provinces and oceanic connectivity from a transport network help designing marine reserves , 2014, 1407.6920.

[74]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Spatial mating networks in insect-pollinated plants. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[75]  Dean L Urban,et al.  A Graph‐Theory Framework for Evaluating Landscape Connectivity and Conservation Planning , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[76]  M. Gatto,et al.  Assessing Dispersal Patterns of Fish Propagules from an Effective Mediterranean Marine Protected Area , 2012, PloS one.

[77]  Russell B. Millar,et al.  Burdens of evidence and the benefits of marine reserves: putting Descartes before des horse? , 2003, Environmental Conservation.

[78]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Integrating connectivity and climate change into marine conservation planning , 2014 .

[79]  U. Bergström,et al.  Ecological coherence of marine protected area networks: a spatial assessment using species distribution models , 2011 .

[80]  John L. Largier,et al.  AVOIDING CURRENT OVERSIGHTS IN MARINE RESERVE DESIGN , 2003 .

[81]  H. Fox,et al.  Surrogates for reef fish connectivity when designing marine protected area networks , 2012 .

[82]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  Complex networks: two ways to be robust? , 2002 .

[83]  Francisco E. Werner,et al.  Coupled Biological and Physical Models: Present Capabilities and Necessary Developments for Future Studies of Population Connectivity , 2007 .

[84]  Robert N. Fisher,et al.  Are hotspots of evolutionary potential adequately protected in southern California , 2008 .

[85]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .

[86]  O. Gaggiotti,et al.  Patterns of colonization in a metapopulation of grey seals , 2002, Nature.

[87]  B. Halpern,et al.  Review Paper. Matching marine reserve design to reserve objectives , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[88]  Christopher G. Lowe,et al.  Movement patterns, home range, and habitat utilization of adult kelp bass Paralabrax clathratus in a temperate no-take marine reserve , 2003 .

[89]  C. Wills,et al.  Scaling of Connectivity in Marine Populations , 2010 .

[90]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape , 2000, Nature.

[91]  Jason J. Roberts,et al.  Reproductive output and duration of the pelagic larval stage determine seascape-wide connectivity of marine populations. , 2012, Integrative and comparative biology.

[92]  R. Cowen,et al.  Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. , 2009, Annual review of marine science.

[93]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[94]  Louisa Wood,et al.  Toward representative protection of the world's coasts and oceans—progress, gaps, and opportunities , 2008 .

[95]  Pedro R. Peres-Neto,et al.  Quantifying and disentangling dispersal in metacommunities: how close have we come? How far is there to go? , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[96]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Single‐species dynamic site selection , 2002 .

[97]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Decision Making , 2009 .

[98]  R. Steneck,et al.  Critical science gaps impede use of no-take fishery reserves. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[99]  S. Gaines,et al.  Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[100]  Ken Brodlie,et al.  A Review of Uncertainty in Data Visualization , 2012, Expanding the Frontiers of Visual Analytics and Visualization.

[101]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Zonation: Spatial conservation planning framework and software version 3.0 user manual , 2011 .

[102]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  A mismatch of scales: challenges in planning for implementation of marine protected areas in the Coral Triangle , 2010 .

[103]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity Conservation: Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics , 2006 .

[104]  L. Gerber,et al.  Climate change impacts on connectivity in the ocean: Implications for conservation , 2014 .