Shear fatigue micromechanics of the cement–bone interface: An in vitro study using digital image correlation techniques

Loss of fixation at the cement–bone interface is known to contribute to aseptic loosening, but little is known about the mechanical damage response of this interface. An in vitro study using cement–bone specimens subjected to shear fatigue loading was performed, and the progression of stiffness changes and creep damage at the interface was measured using digital image correlation techniques. Stiffness changes and creep damage were localized to the contact interface between cement and bone. Interface creep damage followed a three‐phase response with an initial rapid increase in creep, followed by a steady‐state increase, concluding in a final rapid increase in creep. The initial creep phase was accompanied by an increase in interface stiffness, suggesting an initial locking‐in effect at the interface. Interface stiffness decreased as creep damage progressed. Power law models were reasonably successful in describing the creep and stiffness damage response and were a function of loading magnitude, number of loading cycles, and contact area at the interface. More microcrack damage occurred to the cement when compared to the bone, and the damage was localized along the interface. These findings indicate that damage to the cement–bone interface could be minimized by improving cement–bone contact and by strengthening the fatigue resistance of the cement. © 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27:340–346, 2009

[1]  J. Boss,et al.  The bone-cement interface: histological observations on the interface of cemented arthroplasties within the immediate and late phases. , 1993, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[2]  J. Lewis,et al.  Mechanical properties of the fibrous tissue found at the bone-cement interface following total joint replacement. , 1982, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  S. Woo,et al.  Regional variation in shear strength of the bone-polymethylmethacrylate interface. , 1987, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  M. Doblaré,et al.  A coupled viscoplastic rate-dependent damage model for the simulation of fatigue failure of cement–bone interfaces , 2007 .

[5]  L Ryd,et al.  Intermittent micromotion inhibits bone ingrowth. Titanium implants in rabbits. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[6]  A. Race,et al.  The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: A cadaver model with simulated blood flow , 2006, Acta orthopaedica.

[7]  R. Cook,et al.  Advanced Mechanics of Materials , 1985 .

[8]  L. Cristofolini,et al.  Modelling the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements: experimental and finite element methods. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  R. E. Sherman,et al.  Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  S. Stupp,et al.  Mechanical strength of poly(methyl methacrylate) cement-human bone interfaces. , 1983, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  Migration, particles, and fluid pressure. A discussion of causes of prosthetic loosening , 1998 .

[12]  José Manuel García-Aznar,et al.  Modelling the mixed-mode failure of cement¿bone interfaces , 2006 .

[13]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Finite element simulation of anisotropic damage accumulation and creep in acrylic bone cement , 2004 .

[14]  Nico Verdonschot,et al.  Can Finite Element Models Detect Clinically Inferior Cemented Hip Implants? , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  Peter Thomsen,et al.  Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: A review of different theories , 2006, Acta orthopaedica.

[16]  K. Mann,et al.  Creep dominates tensile fatigue damage of the cement–bone interface , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  J Kärrholm,et al.  Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  R. Beaver,et al.  Penetration and shear strength of cement-bone interfaces in vivo. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  H. Saunders,et al.  Advanced Mechanics of Materials (4th Ed.) , 1988 .

[20]  K. Mann,et al.  A fatigue damage model for the cement-bone interface. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  L. Cristofolini,et al.  An experimental analogue to model the fibrous tissue layer in cemented hip replacements. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[22]  Nico Verdonschot,et al.  Experimental micromechanics of the cement–bone interface , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  W. Maloney,et al.  The histology of the radiolucent line. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  Effect of amplitude of micromotion on bone ingrowth into titanium chambers implanted in the rabbit tibia. , 1992, Biomaterials.

[26]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.