A Hybrid Thresholding Algorithm for Cloud Detection on Ground-Based Color Images

AbstractCloud detection is the precondition for deriving other information (e.g., cloud cover) in ground-based sky imager applications. This paper puts forward an effective cloud detection approach, the Hybrid Thresholding Algorithm (HYTA) that fully exploits the benefits of the combination of fixed and adaptive thresholding methods. First, HYTA transforms an input color cloud image into a normalized blue/red channel ratio image that can keep a distinct contrast, even with noise and outliers. Then, HYTA identifies the ratio image as either unimodal or bimodal according to its standard deviation, and the unimodal and bimodal images are handled by fixed and minimum cross entropy (MCE) thresholding algorithms, respectively. The experimental results demonstrate that HYTA shows an accuracy of 88.53%, which is far higher than those of either fixed or MCE thresholding alone. Moreover, HYTA is also verified to outperform other state-of-the-art cloud detection approaches.

[1]  Josep Calbó,et al.  Feature Extraction from Whole-Sky Ground-Based Images for Cloud-Type Recognition , 2008 .

[2]  A Cazorla,et al.  Development of a sky imager for cloud cover assessment. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  C. H. Li,et al.  An iterative algorithm for minimum cross entropy thresholding , 1998, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[4]  G. Stephens Cloud Feedbacks in the Climate System: A Critical Review , 2005 .

[5]  Yongqiang Wang,et al.  Recognizing white line markings for vision-guided vehicle navigation by fuzzy reasoning , 1997, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[6]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[7]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[8]  Enio Bueno Pereira,et al.  A Simple Method for the Assessment of the Cloud Cover State in High-Latitude Regions by a Ground-Based Digital Camera , 2006 .

[9]  Sang Uk Lee,et al.  A comparative performance study of several global thresholding techniques for segmentation , 1990, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[10]  Douglas V. Hoyt Interannual Cloud-Cover Variations in the Contiguous United States , 1978 .

[11]  A. Heinle,et al.  Automatic cloud classification of whole sky images , 2010 .

[12]  G. Zibordi,et al.  Radiometric and Geometric Calibration of a Visible Spectral Electro-Optic “Fisheye” Camera Radiance Distribution System , 1989 .

[13]  Allan D. Jepson,et al.  Benchmarking Image Segmentation Algorithms , 2009, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[15]  J. Kirkby,et al.  Cosmic Rays, Clouds, and Climate , 2002, Science.

[16]  Evgueni I. Kassianov,et al.  Cloud Sky Cover versus Cloud Fraction: Whole-Sky Simulations and Observations , 2005 .

[17]  Chun-hung Li,et al.  Minimum cross entropy thresholding , 1993, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Juan Huo,et al.  Cloud Determination of All-Sky Images under Low-Visibility Conditions , 2009 .

[19]  Josep Calbó,et al.  Retrieving Cloud Characteristics from Ground-Based Daytime Color All-Sky Images , 2006 .

[20]  W. Rossow,et al.  ISCCP Cloud Data Products , 1991 .

[21]  Kenneth A. Buch,et al.  Cloud classification using whole-sky imager data , 1995 .

[22]  E. Pereira,et al.  The Use of Euclidean Geometric Distance on RGB Color Space for the Classification of Sky and Cloud Patterns , 2010 .