A DIGITAL TWIN FOR ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS AND PRODUCT QUALITY MONITORING

Mass customization and increasing product complexity require new methods to ensure a continuously high product quality. In the case of product failures it has to be determined what distinguishes flawed products. The data generated by cybertronic products over their lifecycle offers new possibilities to find such distinctions. To manage this data for individual product instances the concept of a Digital Twin has been proposed. This paper introduces the elements of a Digital Twin for root cause analysis and product quality monitoring and suggests a data structure that enables data analytics.

[1]  Jay Lee,et al.  A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems , 2015 .

[2]  Christian Muggeo,et al.  Kern des System Lifecycle Management , 2016 .

[3]  Fei Tao,et al.  Big Data in product lifecycle management , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[4]  Andreas Lindner,et al.  DECISION SUPPORT FOR IMPROVING THE DESIGN OF HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS BY LEADING FEEDBACK INTO PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 2011 .

[5]  S. Michael Spottswood,et al.  Reengineering Aircraft Structural Life Prediction Using a Digital Twin , 2011 .

[6]  Andreas Lindner,et al.  Development of a knowledge-based feedback assistance system of product use information for product improvement , 2014 .

[7]  Michael Abramovici,et al.  Semantic data management for the development and continuous reconfiguration of smart products and systems , 2016 .

[8]  Jay Lee,et al.  Recent advances and trends in predictive manufacturing systems in big data environment , 2013 .

[9]  Stefan Boschert,et al.  Digital Twin—The Simulation Aspect , 2016 .

[10]  Manuel Oliva,et al.  Product Avatar as Digital Counterpart of a Physical Individual Product: Literature Review and Implications in an Aircraft , 2015, ISPE CE.

[11]  Nikolaos Madenas,et al.  Integrating product lifecycle management systems with maintenance information across the supply chain for root cause analysis , 2014 .

[12]  Bernhard Mitschang,et al.  Product Life Cycle Analytics – Next Generation Data Analytics on Structured and Unstructured Data☆ , 2015 .

[13]  Andreas Lindner,et al.  Providing product use knowledge for the design of improved product generations , 2011 .

[14]  Michael W. Grieves,et al.  Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems , 2017 .

[15]  Martin Eigner,et al.  mecPro2- Entwurf einer Beschreibungssystematik zur Entwicklung cybertronischer Systeme mit SysML , 2015 .

[16]  Martin Eigner,et al.  Kurzer Begriff und Nutzen des System Lifecycle Management , 2015 .

[17]  Cristian S. Calude,et al.  The Deluge of Spurious Correlations in Big Data , 2016, Foundations of Science.

[18]  Fei Tao,et al.  Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data , 2017, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[19]  Michael Pfenning,et al.  Die Rolle von MBSE und PLM im Industrial Internet , 2015 .

[20]  Yingfeng Zhang,et al.  A framework for Big Data driven product lifecycle management , 2017 .

[21]  Edward H. Glaessgen,et al.  The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles , 2012 .