Postfusion pullout strength comparison of a novel pedicle screw with classical pedicle screws on synthetic foams

Pullout is a very common failure mode on the use of pedicle screws. Numerous studies were completed to increase the pullout strength of pedicle screws especially for osteoporotic bones. In this study, a previously designed pedicle screw type was tested before and after fusion condition. Synthetic polyurethane foams were used in all tests. Three different grades of foams were used in tests to simulate severely osteoporotic, osteoporotic, and healthy bones. Test blocks were produced and characterized in our clinical biomechanics laboratory. Foaming of polyurethane was accepted as fusion process (bone in growth). Pedicle screw including radial holes (new design) was tested both before and after the fusion. It also exhibited remarkably higher pullout strength after fusion than before fusion and most of other alternatives stated in the literature. In total, 70% higher pullout strength was achieved with new design after fusion. On the other hand, new design did not dominate other alternatives when comparison was carried out on severely osteoporotic and healthy bones. To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first study investigating the postfusion properties on synthetic foams.

[1]  T. Demir,et al.  Design and biomechanical testing of pedicle screw for osteoporotic incidents , 2012, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[2]  Young-Yul Kim,et al.  Assessment of pedicle screw pullout strength based on various screw designs and bone densities-an ex vivo biomechanical study. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[3]  Xiujun Zheng,et al.  Is It Safe to Back Out Pedicle Screws After Augmentation With Polymethyl Methacrylate or Calcium Phosphate Cement?: A Biomechanical Study , 2011, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[4]  K. Kim,et al.  A case of pedicle screw loosening treated by modified transpedicular screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate. , 2011, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[5]  Zhaomin Zheng,et al.  Effect of the Degree of Osteoporosis on the Biomechanical Anchoring Strength of the Sacral Pedicle Screws: An In Vitro Comparison Between Unaugmented Bicortical Screws and Polymethylmethacrylate Augmented Unicortical Screws , 2010, Spine.

[6]  A. Quaile Spine disorders: medical and surgical management , 2010 .

[7]  Zi-xiang Wu,et al.  Biomechanical and histological evaluation of an expandable pedicle screw in osteoporotic spine in sheep , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[8]  Ze-min Li,et al.  [Choice of bone cement augmentation techniques when sacral pedicle screw loosening]. , 2010, Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  C. Niu,et al.  Pullout strength for cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation in severely osteoporotic bone: influences of radial hole and pilot hole tapping. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  M. Beppu,et al.  An Experimental Study on Initial Fixation Strength in Transpedicular Screwing Augmented With Calcium Phosphate Cement , 2009, Spine.

[11]  D. Bednar,et al.  Pullout strength of pedicle screws augmented with particulate calcium phosphate: an experimental study. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  R. Xu,et al.  [Comparison study of biomechanical test among fixation techniques of three types screw of posterior approach for C2]. , 2009, Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology.

[13]  M. Ogon,et al.  Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[14]  Peter Augat,et al.  Influence of thread design on pedicle screw fixation. Laboratory investigation. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[15]  Qing Hang Zhang,et al.  Effects of bone materials on the screw pull-out strength in human spine. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  G. Njus,et al.  Experimental evaluation of the holding power/stiffness of the self-tapping bone screws in normal and osteoporotic bone material. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  Chunhui Wu,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Trajectory Pedicle Screw versus Injectable Calcium Sulfate Graft-Augmented Pedicle Screw for Salvage in Cadaveric Thoracic Bone , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[18]  Zi-xiang Wu,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of an expansive pedicle screw in calf vertebrae. , 2005, European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society.

[19]  M. Yetmez,et al.  [Comparison of the pull-out strengths of three different screws in pedicular screw revisions: a biomechanical study]. , 2006, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[20]  C. Chao,et al.  Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: Biomechanical tests and finite element analyses , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  H. An,et al.  Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: a pilot study. , 2005, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[22]  C. Kissel,et al.  Comparison of pullout strength of small-diameter cannulated and solid-core screws. , 2003, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[23]  R-M Lin,et al.  Biomechanical investigation of pedicle screw-vertebrae complex: a finite element approach using bonded and contact interface conditions. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  Hiroshi Yamamoto,et al.  Enhancement of pedicle screw stability using calcium phosphate cement in osteoporotic vertebrae: in vivo biomechanical study , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[25]  S. M. Haddock,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of a Double-Threaded Pedicle Screw in Elderly Vertebrae , 2002, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[26]  S. Cook,et al.  Lumbosacral fixation using expandable pedicle screws. an alternative in reoperation and osteoporosis. , 2001, The spine journal.

[27]  Y. An,et al.  An injectable cementing screw for fixation in osteoporotic bone. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[28]  孙常太,et al.  Mechanical and histological analysis of bone-pedicle screw interface in vivo: titanium versus stainless steel , 1999 .

[29]  H. Serhan,et al.  An Experimental Study of Lumbar Destabilization: Restabilization and Bone Density , 1997, Spine.

[30]  M. Pope,et al.  Correlation of bone equivalent mineral density to pull-out resistance of triangulated pedicle screw construct. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[31]  T C Hearn,et al.  Insertional Torque and Pull‐out Strengths of Conical and Cylindrical Pedicle Screws in Cadaveric Bone , 1996, Spine.

[32]  K. Murota,et al.  An Experimental Study on Transpedicular Screw Fixation in Relation to Osteoporosis of the Lumbar Spine , 1991, Spine.

[33]  B. T. Field,et al.  A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.