On Dealing with Structural Conflicts between Process Type and Instance Changes

Adaptive process management systems must be able to support changes of single process instances as well as modifications at the process type level and their propagation to a collection of related process instances. So far, these two kinds of dynamic process changes have been mainly considered in an isolated manner. However, especially for long-running processes, it must be possible to handle the interplay between process type and instance changes as well, but without running into trouble at runtime. This paper presents an extended criterion for correctly propagating process type changes to both, instances which are still running according to their original schema and instances which have been individually modified. In this context, we discuss and categorize structural conflicts potentially occuring between concurrent process changes. We show that our considerations are applicable to different process meta models and present tests for quickly detecting such structural conflicts.

[1]  Maria E. Orlowska,et al.  Managing Change and Time in Dynamic Workflow Processes , 2000, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[2]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  Adeptflex—Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflows Without Losing Control , 1998, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[3]  Peter Dadam,et al.  Evaluation of Correctness Criteria for Dynamic Workflow Changes , 2003, Business Process Management.

[4]  Matjaz B. Juric,et al.  Business process execution language for web services , 2004 .

[5]  Robert Meersman,et al.  On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  Grzegorz Rozenberg,et al.  Dynamic change within workflow systems , 1995, COCS '95.

[7]  Giorgio De Michelis,et al.  Improving Flexibility of Workflow Management Systems , 2000, Business Process Management.

[8]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change , 2002 .

[9]  Tony Andrews.  Business Process Execution Language for Web Services Version 1.1 , 2003 .

[10]  Frank Leymann,et al.  Exception Handling in the BPEL4WS Language , 2003, Business Process Management.

[11]  Peter Dadam,et al.  On the Common Support of Workflow Type and Instance Changes under Correctness Constraints , 2003, OTM.

[12]  Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede,et al.  A reflective infrastructure for workflow adaptability , 2000, Data Knowl. Eng..

[13]  Peter Dadam,et al.  Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems - a survey , 2004, Data Knowl. Eng..

[14]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Formal foundation and conceptual design of dynamic adaptations in a workflow management system , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Frank Leymann,et al.  Managing Business Processes an an Information Resource , 1994, IBM Syst. J..

[16]  Fabio Casati,et al.  Workflow Evolution , 1996, ER.

[17]  Andreas Geppert,et al.  Dynamic workflow schema evolution based on workflow type versioning and workflow migration , 1999, Proceedings Fourth IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems. CoopIS 99 (Cat. No.PR00384).

[18]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  IntelliGEN: A Distributed Workflow System for Discovering Protein-Protein Interactions , 2004, Distributed and Parallel Databases.

[19]  Peter Dadam,et al.  Flexible Support of Team Processes by Adaptive Workflow Systems , 2004, Distributed and Parallel Databases.