Design Operability and Retrofit Analysis (DORA) framework for energy systems

Abstract A systematic framework for Design Operability and Retrofit Analysis (DORA) is presented. DORA is a framework explicitly analyzing energy system design containing process units functioning at different levels of operability. To express the operability of individual process units, DORA uses inoperability input-output modeling (IIM) approach. Based on IIM, a simple mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model is developed to analyze the impact of individual process unit inoperability on the flexibility of an energy system design. In the case where a design is deemed to possess insufficient flexibility to meet demands, DORA framework subsequently entails a step-by-step guide to debottleneck and retrofit a given design based on benefit-cost ratio (BCR). In this work, the DORA framework is demonstrated using a biomass-based tri-generation system (BTS) case study. As shown in the case study, DORA framework is used to determine whether a BTS facing a drop in individual unit efficiency, would require debottlenecking and retrofitting to increase its energy production.

[1]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Optimization strategies for flexible chemical processes , 1983 .

[2]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Operability, Resiliency, and Flexibility: process design objectives for a changing world , 1983 .

[3]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Move over! Stock turnover, retrofit and industrial energy efficiency , 2005 .

[4]  Esteban A. Brignole,et al.  A MINLP strategy for the debottlenecking problem in an ethane extraction plant , 1995 .

[5]  Mahdi Sharifzadeh,et al.  Integration of process design and control: A review , 2013 .

[6]  Roger Sargent,et al.  Process systems engineering: A retrospective view with questions for the future , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[7]  Chuei-Tin Chang,et al.  An algorithmic revamp strategy for improving operational flexibility of multi-contaminant water networks , 2013 .

[8]  Raymond R. Tan,et al.  Heuristic framework for the debottlenecking of a palm oil-based integrated biorefinery , 2014 .

[9]  Michael Baldea,et al.  From process integration to process intensification , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[10]  Arthur W. Westerberg,et al.  A review of process synthesis , 1981 .

[11]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Optimal process design under uncertainty , 1983 .

[12]  Denny K. S. Ng,et al.  Optimal operational adjustment in multi-functional energy systems in response to process inoperability , 2013 .

[13]  Y. Haimes,et al.  Leontief-Based Model of Risk in Complex Interconnected Infrastructures , 2001 .

[14]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part I , 1983 .

[15]  Carlo Roselli,et al.  Distributed microtrigeneration systems , 2012 .

[16]  Mahmoud M. El-Halwagi,et al.  Process intensification: New understanding and systematic approach , 2012 .

[17]  Alexandre C. Dimian,et al.  Integrated design and simulation of chemical processes , 2003 .

[18]  G. T. Polley,et al.  Debottlenecking of heat exchanger networks , 1990 .

[19]  Dominic C.Y. Foo,et al.  Process simulation and debottlenecking for an industrial cocoa manufacturing process , 2011 .

[20]  Sau Man Lai,et al.  Feasibility and flexibility for a trigeneration system , 2009 .

[21]  Silvana Revollar,et al.  Integrated design and control of chemical processes - Part I: Revision and classification , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[22]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  A mixed integer flowsheet optimization strategy for process retrofits—the debottlenecking problem , 1989 .

[23]  W. Leontief Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic Systems of the United States , 1936 .

[24]  Viknesh Andiappan,et al.  Synthesis of tri-generation systems: Technology selection, sizing and redundancy allocation based on operational strategy , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[25]  André Bardow,et al.  The optimum is not enough: A near-optimal solution paradigm for energy systems synthesis , 2015 .

[26]  D. B. Litzen,et al.  Uncover low-cost debottlenecking opportunities , 1999 .

[27]  André Bardow,et al.  Automated superstructure-based synthesis and optimization of distributed energy supply systems , 2013 .

[28]  Alexandros Koulouris,et al.  Throughput analysis and debottlenecking of integrated batch chemical processes , 2000 .

[29]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Design of resilient processing plants—VIII. A resilience index for heat exchanger networks , 1985 .

[30]  Gintaras V. Reklaitis,et al.  Process systems engineering: From Solvay to modern bio- and nanotechnology.: A history of development, successes and prospects for the future , 2011 .

[31]  Johan Grievink,et al.  Process intensification and process systems engineering: A friendly symbiosis , 2008, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[32]  Sau Man Lai,et al.  Measurement of Plant Flexibility , 2007 .

[33]  Marianthi G. Ierapetritou,et al.  Framework for evaluating the feasibility/operability of nonconvex processes , 2003 .

[34]  Denny K. S. Ng,et al.  Synthesis and optimisation of biomass-based tri-generation systems with reliability aspects , 2015 .

[35]  J. J. Klemeš,et al.  An algebraic approach to identifying bottlenecks in linear process models of multifunctional energy systems , 2012, Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering.

[36]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part I: Formulation and theory , 1985 .

[37]  M. H. Panjeshahi,et al.  Pressure drop optimisation in debottlenecking of heat exchanger networks , 2008 .

[38]  Karin Eriksson,et al.  Reasons to apply operability analysis in the design of integrated biorefineries , 2015 .

[39]  Milan Kljajin,et al.  CHP and CCHP systems today , 2011 .

[40]  C. Floudas,et al.  Active constraint strategy for flexibility analysis in chemical processes , 1987 .

[41]  Denny K. S. Ng,et al.  Synthesis of Biomass-based Trigeneration Systems with Uncertainties , 2014 .

[42]  Enrico Sciubba,et al.  A Brief Review of Methods for the Design and Synthesis Optimization of Energy Systems , 2002 .

[43]  Paulien M. Herder,et al.  A concurrent engineering approach to chemical process design , 2000 .