Particle Image Velocimetry using Feature Tracking and Delaunay tessellation

This work presents YATS (Yet Another Tracking Software), an application of Feature Tracking (FT) and Computational Geometry techniques to the measure of fluid flows. From a general point of view, FT can be considered as a correlation based method, working on interrogation windows, for tracking features inside high, medium and low seeded images. FT defines its best correlation measure as the minimum of the Sum of Squared Differences (SSD) of intensity values of pixels between the interrogation windows in two consecutive frames. The implemented algorithm is able to extract interrogation window displacement and deformations from frame to frame adopting, in consecutive steps, two different models of motion for the window itself: a pure translational model, in which a rigid motion hypothesis is adopted, and an affine one, in which first order window deformation parameters are taken into account, allowing the interrogation spot to be translated, rotated, scaled and sheared. For small motions, a linearization of the image intensity leads to solve the SSD minimization problem in a Newton-Raphson style. Velocity computation is performed where the solution of FT linear system exists, i.e. where image intensity gradients are not null both in x and y directions (features). Velocity and velocity gradients are obtained, in a lagrangian fashion, along the trajectory of each feature. As a result, high-density-in-space lagrangian measurements are gained, in terms of fluid velocity and velocity spatial derivatives. Lagrangian information is then embedded into a Delaunay tessellation, which is uniquely defined by the spatial relative positions of the features tracked from time t to t+1: the Eulerian fields of velocity and velocity spatial derivatives are obtained by applying the Natural Neighbours (NN) interpolation algorithm on the Delaunay tessellation itself, for an arbitrary sized grid. In NN method the support for data interpolation is not defined by the same measure in all directions, but is allowed to be non isotropic: support size in r direction is not given by an L2 metric but is a consequence of the geometric construct that defines the region of interaction between the features. Results obtained for two kinds of synthetic images are shown: array of vortices and Std. set of the Visualization Society of Japan. The accuracy of the method is highlighted both in Lagrangian and Eulerian framework. 0 50 100 150 200 250 0

[1]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Geophysical parametrization and interpolation of irregular data using natural neighbours , 1995 .

[2]  Koji Okamoto,et al.  A novel algorithm for particle tracking velocimetry using the velocity gradient tensor , 2000 .

[3]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision , 1981, IJCAI.

[4]  W. Schmidl,et al.  New tracking algorithm for particle image velocimetry , 1995 .

[5]  C Tomasi,et al.  Shape and motion from image streams: a factorization method. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  F. Scarano Iterative image deformation methods in PIV , 2002 .

[7]  Shigeru Nishio,et al.  Standard images for particle-image velocimetry , 2000 .

[8]  J. Nogueira,et al.  Analysis and alternatives in two-dimensional multigrid particle image velocimetry methods: application of a dedicated weighting function and symmetric direct correlation , 2002 .

[9]  Georges Voronoi Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques. Premier mémoire. Sur quelques propriétés des formes quadratiques positives parfaites. , 1908 .

[10]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Good features to track , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  J. Nogueira,et al.  Local field correction PIV, implemented by means of simple algorithms, and multigrid versions , 2001 .

[12]  C. Lawson Software for C1 Surface Interpolation , 1977 .

[13]  H. E. Fiedler,et al.  Limitation and improvement of PIV , 1993 .

[14]  R. Adrian Particle-Imaging Techniques for Experimental Fluid Mechanics , 1991 .

[15]  B. N. Dobbins,et al.  An improved cross correlation technique for particle image velocimetry , 1995 .

[16]  Lorenz Sigurdson,et al.  Image correlation velocimetry applied to discrete smoke-wire streaklines in turbulent pipe flow , 2003 .

[17]  Fujio Yamamoto,et al.  Direct measurement of the vorticity field in digital particle images , 2001 .

[18]  Georges Quénot,et al.  A Standard Protocol for Quantitative Performance Evaluation of PIV Systems , 2000 .

[19]  Paul E. Dimotakis,et al.  Image correlation velocimetry , 1995 .

[20]  W. Merzkirch,et al.  A comparative study of the MQD method and several correlation-based PIV evaluation algorithms , 2000 .

[21]  D. F. Watson Computing the n-Dimensional Delaunay Tesselation with Application to Voronoi Polytopes , 1981, Comput. J..

[22]  Yuichi Murai,et al.  A new tracking algorithm of PIV and removal of spurious vectors using Delaunay tessellation , 1999 .

[23]  J. Nogueira,et al.  Local field correction PIV: on the increase of accuracy of digital PIV systems , 1999 .

[24]  Sang Joon Lee,et al.  A new two-frame particle tracking algorithm using match probability , 1996 .

[25]  Brian J. Cantwell,et al.  The use of particle tracking to obtain planar velocity measurements in an unsteady laminar diffusion flame , 1987 .

[26]  Emanuele Trucco,et al.  Making good features track better , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98CB36231).

[27]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code , 1983, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[28]  Fulvio Scarano,et al.  Advances in iterative multigrid PIV image processing , 2000 .