Developments to an existing city-wide district energy network: Part II – Analysis of environmental and economic impacts

Abstract District heating can provide cost-effective and low-carbon energy to local populations. Although this is rare in the UK, Sheffield already has an award-winning district energy network. It has been previously determined that this could be expanded to incorporate new heat sources and sinks. This paper determines the environmental and socio-economic impacts, focussing on various fuels. Combined-heat-and-power generation in Sheffield coupled with sustainable/renewable fuels, like waste, offer high efficiencies (>77%) and consistently lower carbon emission factors (0.04–0.14 kg/MJ) than conventional energy generation using fossil fuels, since up to 80% of the fuel-carbon is biogenic (CO 2 -neutral). Processing municipal waste into a refuse-derived fuel prior to combustion or lowering the return-water temperature by 35 °C in the district heating network could further improve efficiencies (81–93%) and reduce CO 2 emission rates by 4 t/h for the Sheffield plant, increasing avoided emissions from 69,000 t/a to 80,000–91,000 t/a. Moreover, ways in which the energy supply could be further decarbonised were identified, as well as methods to minimise the impacts of responding to changes in demand. Though initial costs of such schemes are high, they can be economically-viable for the investor/operator and consequently offer competitive rates for customers. Financial support is also available through government-backed schemes.

[1]  Alberto Poggio,et al.  Energy and environmental assessment of small district heating systems: Global and local effects in two case-studies , 2009 .

[2]  Konstantinos D. Patlitzianas An analysis of energy efficiency investments' environment in Greece: The potential role of JESSICA instrument , 2011 .

[3]  Adam J. Strafford A Study In to the Economic, Logistical and Energetic Potential to Condense Household Waste to Form Fuel , 2006 .

[4]  Henrik Lund,et al.  New CHP partnerships offering balancing of fluctuating renewable electricity productions , 2005 .

[5]  Vida N. Sharifi,et al.  Developments to an existing city-wide district energy network - Part I: Identification of potential expansions using heat mapping , 2012 .

[6]  V. Sharifi,et al.  Combustion of refuse-derived fuel in a fluidised bed , 2007 .

[7]  Paola Lettieri,et al.  Techno-economic performance analysis and environmental impact assessment of small to medium scale SRF combustion plants for energy production in the UK. , 2012 .

[8]  Christopher R. Cheeseman,et al.  Comparison of carbon emissions associated with municipal solid waste management in Germany and the UK , 2010 .

[9]  H. Lund,et al.  Towards 100% renewable energy systems☆ , 2011 .

[10]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  On policy instruments for support of micro combined heat and power , 2008 .

[11]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Environmental impacts of distributed energy systems—The case of micro cogeneration , 2008 .

[12]  L Rigamonti,et al.  Energy recovery from municipal waste: a case study for a middle-sized Italian district. , 2008, Waste management.

[13]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  A renewable energy scenario for Aalborg Municipality based on low-temperature geothermal heat, wind , 2010 .

[14]  A Porteous,et al.  Why energy from waste incineration is an essential component of environmentally responsible waste management. , 2005, Waste management.

[15]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Cost optimization of the design of CHCP (combined heat, cooling and power) systems under legal constraints , 2010 .

[16]  Henrik Lund,et al.  Optimal designs of small CHP plants in a market with fluctuating electricity prices , 2005 .

[17]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  The role of district heating in future renewable energy systems , 2010 .

[18]  Lucy Bastin,et al.  Distributed or centralised energy-from-waste policy? Implications of technology and scale at municipal level , 2007 .

[19]  U. Persson,et al.  Heat distribution and the future competitiveness of district heating , 2011 .

[20]  Günter Scheffknecht,et al.  Characterisation of large solid recovered fuel particles for direct co-firing in large PF power plants , 2009 .

[21]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fuels for district heating: A comparison of waste incineration, biomass- and natural gas combustion , 2007 .

[22]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Design, testing and mathematical modelling of a small-scale CHP and cooling system (small CHP-ejector trigeneration) , 2007 .

[23]  Nicholas F. Gray,et al.  Comparative performance of six carbon footprint models for use in Ireland , 2009 .

[24]  S Consonni,et al.  Alternative strategies for energy recovery from municipal solid waste Part B: Emission and cost estimates. , 2005, Waste management.

[25]  Yi Jiang,et al.  A new type of district heating method with co-generation based on absorption heat exchange (co-ah cycle) , 2011 .

[26]  Simon J T Pollard,et al.  The biogenic content of process streams from mechanical-biological treatment plants producing solid recovered fuel. Do the manual sorting and selective dissolution determination methods correlate? , 2010, Waste management.

[27]  Xiaohui Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of a biomass drying process using waste heat from process industries: A case study , 2012 .