A computational model of ratio decidendi

This paper proposes a model ofratio decidendi as a justification structure consisting of a series of reasoning steps, some of which relate abstract predicates to other abstract predicates and some of which relate abstract predicates to specific facts. This model satisfies an important set of characteristics ofratio decidendi identified from the jurisprudential literature. In particular, the model shows how the theory under which a case is decided controls its precedential effect. By contrast, a purely exemplar-based model ofratio decidendi fails to account for the dependency of precedential effect on the theory of decision.

[1]  Karl Branting,et al.  Rules and Precedents as Complementary Warrants , 1991, AAAI.

[2]  Henry Hanna,et al.  The law of workmen's compensation , 1907 .

[3]  Avron Barr,et al.  The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, Volume 1 , 1982 .

[4]  L. Karl Branting,et al.  Reasoning with portions of precedents , 1991 .

[5]  J. Harris,et al.  Precedent in English Law , 1968 .

[6]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[7]  Julio C. Cueto-Rua.  Judicial methods of interpretation of the law , 1981 .

[8]  Donald H. Berman,et al.  Developer's choice in the legal domain: the Sisyphean journey with DBR or down hill with rules (a working paper for the case-rules panel at the third international conference of artificial intelligence and law) , 1991, ICAIL '91.

[9]  H. Gardner,et al.  The Mind's New Science , 1985 .

[10]  Carole D. Hafner,et al.  Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link , 1993, ICAIL '93.

[11]  Kevin D. Ashley,et al.  Waiting on Weighting: A Symbolic Least Commitment Approach , 1988, AAAI.

[12]  Edward Hirsch Levi,et al.  An Introduction to Legal Reasoning , 1950 .

[13]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[14]  Raymond J. Mooney,et al.  A general explanation-based learning mechanism and its application to narrative understanding , 1990 .

[15]  C. Roads,et al.  The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, Volume 1 , 1982 .

[16]  David Aha.  A study of instance-based algorithms for supervised learning tasks: mathematica:l , 1990 .

[17]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  Learning and reasoning by analogy , 1980, CACM.

[18]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Contextual relevance in analogical reasoning: a model of legal argument , 1989 .

[19]  J. L. Montrose,et al.  The Ratio Decidendi Of A Case , 1957 .

[20]  Saul Amarel,et al.  On representations of problems of reasoning about actions , 1968 .

[21]  Edwina L. Rissland,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Law: Stepping Stones to a Model of Legal Reasoning , 1990 .

[22]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Ed Brinksma.  Invited Address I , 1995 .

[24]  Kevin D Ashley.  Modelling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, a Thesis Proposal. , 1986 .

[25]  Alan Tyree.  Expert Systems in Law , 1989 .

[26]  Edwina L. Rissland,et al.  Arguments and cases: An inevitable intertwining , 1992, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[27]  Harry E. Pople,et al.  Session 6 Theorem Proving and Logic: I I ON THE MECHANIZATION OF ABDUCTIVE LOGIC , 2006 .

[28]  Benjamin N. Cardozo,et al.  The Nature of the Judicial Process , 1921 .

[29]  Franklin H. Giddings,et al.  The Study of Cases , 1924 .

[30]  Ray Bareiss,et al.  Concept Learning and Heuristic Classification in WeakTtheory Domains , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[31]  Rob Jerrard,et al.  Precedent , 1984 .

[32]  Charles W. Collier.  Precedent and Legal Authority: A Critical History , 1988 .

[33]  Richard Warner.  Three Theories of Legal Reasoning , 1989 .

[34]  Allen Newell,et al.  The Knowledge Level , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[35]  Karl Branting,et al.  Integrating rules and precedents for classification and explanation: automating legal analysis , 1990 .

[36]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[37]  Arthur L. Goodhart,et al.  DETERMINING THE RATIO DECIDENMI OF A CASE , 1930 .

[38]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[39]  L. T. McCarty.  A language for legal discourse , 1989 .

[40]  J. Raz,et al.  The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality , 1979 .