Random Feature Discriminant for Linear Representation Based Robust Face Recognition

The linear representation based classification methods include two independent steps: representation and decision. First, the query image is represented as a linear combination of training samples. Then the classification decision is made by evaluating which class leads to the minimum class-wise representation error. However, these two steps have different goals. The representation step prefers accuracy while the decision step requires discrimination. Thus precisely representing the query image does not always benefit the decision process. In this paper, we propose a novel linear representation based classifier which no longer separates representation from decision. We repeatedly construct linear representation based classification models with randomly selected features. Then the best model is selected by using the representation discriminant criterion (RDC) which evaluates the discrimination of a representation model. We conduct extensive experiments on public benchmark databases to verify the efficacy of the proposed method.

[1]  Yuan Yan Tang,et al.  Face Recognition Under Varying Illumination Using Gradientfaces , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Ming Yang,et al.  DeepFace: Closing the Gap to Human-Level Performance in Face Verification , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Face Description with Local Binary Patterns: Application to Face Recognition , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Xiaogang Wang,et al.  Deeply learned face representations are sparse, selective, and robust , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[5]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Acquiring linear subspaces for face recognition under variable lighting , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[7]  Andy Harter,et al.  Parameterisation of a stochastic model for human face identification , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision.

[8]  Aleix M. Martinez,et al.  The AR face database , 1998 .

[9]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Face recognition using eigenfaces , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Jing Wang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Adaptive Sparse Representation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[12]  James Philbin,et al.  FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[13]  Guo-Can Feng,et al.  Weighted group sparse representation for undersampled face recognition , 2014, Neurocomputing.

[14]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[15]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Matching with PROSAC - progressive sample consensus , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[16]  Qingmin Liao,et al.  Locally Collaborative Representation in Similar Subspace for Face Recognition , 2015, CCBR.

[17]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Sparse representation or collaborative representation: Which helps face recognition? , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[18]  Mohammed Bennamoun,et al.  Linear Regression for Face Recognition , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[19]  A. Martínez,et al.  The AR face databasae , 1998 .

[20]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  From Few to Many: Illumination Cone Models for Face Recognition under Variable Lighting and Pose , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..