Significance ranking and correlation identification of accident causes in process industry based on system thinking and statistical analysis

Accidents in process industry occur frequently with serious casualties and property losses. This paper builds an accident causation model of process industry based on system thinking by dividing the accident causation system into 4 subsystems and 22 factors. A combination of grey relational analysis and correspondence analysis is conducted to carry out a structured analysis of the collected data. The research contains three main parts: (1) Grey relational analysis is used to obtain the significance ranking of 22 cause factors in process industry, and three critical cause factors are identified as “Security inspection,” “Risk identification,” and “Security awareness.” (2) Through correspondence analysis, the correlations between three sets of variables are analyzed and the cause factors requiring focused attention are identified as “Electric spark,” “Temperature,” “Raw material control,” “Punching phenomenon,” “Equipment clogging,” and “Combustible gases.” (3) An intelligent monitoring scheme is developed for the critical factors of each subsystem, which aims to achieve real‐time monitoring and early warning by means of video surveillance and sensor placement for the human, equipment, and environment subsystems. The conclusions obtained from this study can be used to enhance the efficiency of safety management and reduce the probability of accident occurrence in the process industry.

[1]  Anupam Nanda,et al.  Exploring the complexity of highways infrastructure programmes in the United Kingdom through systems thinking , 2023, Project Leadership and Society.

[2]  Md. Tanjin Amin,et al.  Process safety analysis using operational data and Bayesian network , 2023, Process Safety Progress.

[3]  T. Gernay,et al.  Resilience assessment of process industry facilities using dynamic Bayesian networks , 2022, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[4]  Kaili Xu,et al.  Accident causation models developed in China between 1978 and 2018: Review and comparison , 2022, Safety Science.

[5]  Victor N. Esenowo,et al.  Analysis of accidents caused by human factors in the oil and gas industry using the HFACS-OGI framework , 2021, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[6]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Analysis of events involving the intentional release of hazardous substances from industrial facilities , 2021, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  A. Jin,et al.  Scenarios simulation of high-temperature molten metal tipping accidents with RealFlow software , 2020 .

[8]  G. Reniers,et al.  Chemical industry in China: The current status, safety problems, and pathways for future sustainable development , 2020, Safety Science.

[9]  Mehdi Jahangiri,et al.  A novel Fuzzy Bayesian Network approach for safety analysis of process systems; An application of HFACS and SHIPP methodology , 2020 .

[10]  Mengmeng Chen,et al.  Human factors of fire and explosion accidents in petrochemical enterprises , 2019, Process Safety Progress.

[11]  Jianfang Dong,et al.  Reliability Analysis of Electric Human Factors Based on Grey Correlation Analysis , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[12]  Sohag Kabir,et al.  Applications of Bayesian networks and Petri nets in safety, reliability, and risk assessments: A review , 2019, Safety Science.

[13]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  A resilience-based integrated process systems hazard analysis (RIPSHA) approach: Part II management system layer , 2018, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[14]  Zheng Zhou,et al.  Grey relational analysis between hesitant fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Availability analysis of safety critical systems using advanced fault tree and stochastic Petri net formalisms , 2016 .

[16]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Network based approach for predictive accident modelling , 2015 .

[17]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: A Bayesian approach , 2013 .

[18]  He-Da Zhang,et al.  Characteristics of hazardous chemical accidents in China: A statistical investigation , 2012 .

[19]  W. Jie,et al.  Fatality and influence factors in high-casualty fires: A correspondence analysis , 2012 .

[20]  Faisal Khan,et al.  SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: Methodology and model description , 2011 .

[21]  Faisal Khan,et al.  SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part II. Validation with case study , 2011 .

[22]  Emmanuel Manatakis,et al.  Towards an evaluation of accident investigation methods in terms of their alignment with accident causation models , 2009 .

[23]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Methodology for computer aided fuzzy fault tree analysis , 2009 .

[24]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Techniques and methodologies for risk analysis in chemical process industries , 1998 .

[25]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Identification of critical causes of construction accidents in China using a model based on system thinking and case analysis , 2020, Safety Science.

[26]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network , 2013 .

[27]  Paul Amyotte,et al.  Prevention in the chemical and process industries: Future directions , 2012 .

[28]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Handling and updating uncertain information in bow-tie analysis , 2012 .