Translating Health IT Policy into Practice in the UK NHS

The challenge to provide a nation-wide integrated health service is central to UK government policy. The National Program for Information Technology was launched in 2002 to transform healthcare using information and communications technology. As the largest, non-military, non-scientific government funded IT program worldwide, it was planned over a decade with an estimated total cost expected to exceed £20bn. This paper is a longitudi - nal study of the National Care Record Service, which was the largest part of the program, aimed to provide 50 million UK (English) citizens with an electronic health record. Using episodic interviewing techniques over ten years and secondary source material, the find - ings reveal a series of IT policy changes to the original Program. Delays to roll out electronic health records are linked to issues about procurement strategies with IT suppliers, benefits realisation, risk assessment and clinical engagement. This study extends academic work on the deployment of large scale, long-term publicly funded IT projects, which go beyond the technical imperative to transform healthcare. Findings suggest government agencies need to embed cultural, social and economic criteria into health IT policy-making. Track- ing this Program for a decade, we observe how a centralised, top-down approach was re- placed by localised IT procurement and implementation, giving NHS organisations more decision-making powers. However, the Program was beset by continuous policy changes affecting the structure, organisation and IT of the NHS, where attempts to achieve benefits finally resulted in the break-up of the Program.

[1]  Mark H. Moore,et al.  Creating Public Value , 2017 .

[2]  Antoine Geissbuhler,et al.  Lessons learned implementing a regional health information exchange in Geneva as a pilot for the Swiss national eHealth strategy. , 2013, International journal of medical informatics.

[3]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  Critically classifying: UK e‐government website benchmarking and the recasting of the citizen as customer , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[4]  Annemette Kjærgaard,et al.  Using Existing Response Repertoires to Make Sense of Information System Implementation , 2010, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion , 2009, MIS Q..

[6]  Agne Suziedelyte,et al.  How does searching for health information on the Internet affect individuals' demand for health care services? , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[7]  C. Goldzweig,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. , 2009, Health affairs.

[8]  Enrico Coiera,et al.  Health Information Management: Integrating Information and Communication Technology in Health Care Work , 2003 .

[9]  Wullianallur Raghupathi,et al.  Strategic Value of an Unbound, Interoperable PHR Platform for Rights-Managed Care Coordination , 2012, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Kaija Saranto,et al.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  Nursing Terminologies as Evolving Large-Scale Information Infrastructures , 2012, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Ashish K. Jha,et al.  Record Systems Small , Nonteaching , And Rural Hospitals Continue To Be Slow In Adopting Electronic , 2012 .

[14]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data , 1993 .

[15]  W. Currie TEMPEST: An integrative model for health technology assessment , 2012 .

[16]  Mike Martin,et al.  Inside a Digital Experiment: Co-producing Telecare Services for Older People , 2012, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Adam Reich,et al.  Disciplined doctors: the electronic medical record and physicians' changing relationship to medical knowledge. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[18]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Implementing healthcare information systems - Mirroring a wide spectrum of images of an IT project $ , 2014 .

[19]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed. , 2005 .

[20]  Stephen Goundrey-Smith Electronic Patient Records , 2013 .

[21]  Paul Bate,et al.  Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[22]  Christian Hardless,et al.  Heterogeneous Inter-Organisational IT Innovation Creation: Institutional constraints in a public sector oriented market , 2011, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Johan Sæbø,et al.  Scaling of HIS in a global context: Same, same, but different , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[24]  David C. Yen,et al.  Factors affecting cross-hospital exchange of Electronic Medical Records , 2009, Information & Management.

[25]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  In Pursuit of the Re‐Engineering Agenda in Public Administration , 1997 .

[26]  Corinna Sorenson,et al.  Use of innovation payments to encourage the adoption of new medical technologies in the English NHS , 2013 .

[27]  Jane Hendy,et al.  Challenges to implementing the national programme for information technology (NPfIT): a qualitative study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  Claudia Pagliari,et al.  Time for a reality check of NPfIT’s problems , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Annabelle L. Mark,et al.  Modernising healthcare – is the NPfIT for purpose? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[30]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  An Organizational Culture-Based Theory of Clinical Information Systems Implementation in Hospitals , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[31]  J. Hendy,et al.  Adoption in practice: The relationship between managerial interpretations of evidence and the adoption of a healthcare innovation , 2013 .

[32]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[33]  J. Aarts Towards safe electronic health records: A socio-technical perspective and the need for incident reporting , 2012 .

[34]  J. Blackmer Current Global Trends in Medical Professionalism , 2009 .

[35]  D. Chinn Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[36]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Institutional isomorphism and change: the national programme for IT – 10 years on , 2012, J. Inf. Technol..

[37]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Digital divide across the European Union , 2012, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  ‘The biggest computer programme in the world…ever!’: time for a change in mindset? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[39]  Margunn Aanestad,et al.  Benefits of Local Knowledge in Shaping Standards , 2012, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Greg Wise,et al.  Keys to engaging clinicians in clinical IT. , 2009, Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association.

[41]  John W. Hill,et al.  The national healthcare crisis: Is eHealth a key solution? , 2009 .

[42]  C. Sabel,et al.  Whose data is it anyway ? ” The implications of putting small rea-level health and social data online aniel , 2013 .

[43]  T. Cornford,et al.  NHS information: Revolution or evolution? , 2012 .

[44]  Ruth Thorlby,et al.  High Quality Care For All , 2008 .

[45]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  Electronic patient record development in Norway: The case for an evolutionary strategy , 2012 .

[46]  Vasiliki Mantzana,et al.  Identifying healthcare actors involved in the adoption of information systems , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Unity in Diversity: Electronic Patient Record Use in Multidisciplinary Practice , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Signe Vikkelsø,et al.  In between Curing and Counting: Performative Effects of Experiments With Healthcare Information Infrastructure , 2007 .

[49]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[50]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed-method case study , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.