Corroboration of mechanobiological simulations of tissue differentiation in an in vivo bone chamber using a lattice‐modeling approach

It is well established that the mechanical environment modulates tissue differentiation, and a number of mechanoregulatory theories for describing the process have been proposed. In this study, simulations of an in vivo bone chamber experiment were performed that allowed direct comparison with experimental data. A mechanoregulation theory for mesenchymal stem cell differentiation based on a combination of fluid flow and shear strain (computed using finite element analysis) was implemented to predict tissue differentiation inside mechanically controlled bone chambers inserted into rat tibae. To simulate cell activity, a lattice approach with stochastic cell migration, proliferation, and selected differentiation was adopted; because of its stochastic nature, each run of the simulation gave a somewhat different result. Simulations predicted the load‐dependency of the tissue differentiation inside the chamber and a qualitative agreement with histological data; however, the full variability found between specimens in the experiment could not be predicted by the mechanoregulation algorithm. This result raises the question whether tissue differentiation predictions can be linked to genetic variability in animal populations. © 2009 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27:1659–1666, 2009

[1]  F. Pauwels,et al.  [A new theory on the influence of mechanical stimuli on the differentiation of supporting tissue. The tenth contribution to the functional anatomy and causal morphology of the supporting structure]. , 1960, Zeitschrift fur Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte.

[2]  Liesbet Geris,et al.  Application of mechanoregulatory models to simulate peri-implant tissue formation in an in vivo bone chamber. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Patrick J. Prendergast,et al.  Tissue differentiation and bone regeneration in an osteotomized mandible: a computational analysis of the latency period , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[4]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Corroboration of mechanoregulatory algorithms for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: comparison with in vivo results , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  B. Shur,et al.  Molecular analysis of cell surface beta-1,4-galactosyltransferase function during cell migration. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  R. Huiskes,et al.  A biomechanical regulatory model for periprosthetic fibrous-tissue differentiation , 1997, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[7]  Michael T Longaker,et al.  Relationships between tissue dilatation and differentiation in distraction osteogenesis. , 2006, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[8]  Patrick J Prendergast,et al.  Prediction of the optimal mechanical properties for a scaffold used in osteochondral defect repair. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[9]  Pieter Buma,et al.  Development of a large titanium bone chamber to study in vivo bone ingrowth. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[10]  Elise F. Morgan,et al.  Assessment of a mechano-regulation theory of skeletal tissue differentiation in an in vivo model of mechanically induced cartilage formation , 2009, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[11]  E. Fletcher,et al.  Repetitive, episodic hypoxia causes diurnal elevation of blood pressure in rats. , 1992, Hypertension.

[12]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Random-walk models of cell dispersal included in mechanobiological simulations of tissue differentiation. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Frederick Grinnell,et al.  Modulation of fibroblast morphology and adhesion during collagen matrix remodeling. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[14]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  PMMA particles and pressure—a study of the osteolytic properties of two agents proposed to cause prosthetic loosening , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[15]  Frederick Grinnell,et al.  Fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and wound contraction , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  L. Claes,et al.  Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Friedrich Pauwels,et al.  A New Theory Concerning the Influence of Mechanical Stimuli on the Differentiation of the Supporting Tissues , 1980 .

[18]  B. Falkner,et al.  The Effect of Excess Dietary Sucrose on Growth, Blood Pressure, and Metabolism in Developing Sprague-Dawley Rats , 1994, Pediatric Research.

[19]  R E Guldberg,et al.  Mechanical Stimulation of Tissue Repair in the Hydraulic Bone Chamber , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Correlations between mechanical stress history and tissue differentiation in initial fracture healing , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  P. Prendergast,et al.  A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  V. Everts,et al.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis , 2009, Odontology.

[23]  Dennis R. Carter,et al.  Mechanobiology of Skeletal Regeneration , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  F. Pauwels,et al.  Eine neue Theorie ber den Einflu mechanischer Reize auf die Differenzierung der Sttzgewebe: Zehnter Beitrag zur funktionellen Anatomie und kausalen Morphologie des Sttzapparates , 1960 .

[25]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[26]  Robert Lanza,et al.  Essentials of stem cell biology , 2009 .

[27]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  A mechano-regulatory bone-healing model incorporating cell-phenotype specific activity. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  Pascal Swider,et al.  A predictive mechano-biological model of the bone-implant healing , 2006 .

[29]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis: mechano-regulation by shear strain and fluid velocity. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  P Aspenberg,et al.  Cartilage induction by controlled mechanical stimulation in vivo , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[31]  Elizabeth G Loboa,et al.  Mechanobiology of mandibular distraction osteogenesis: Finite element analyses with a rat model , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  P. Aspenberg,et al.  The fate of mechanically induced cartilage in an unloaded environment. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces , 1997 .

[34]  Friedrich Pauwels Eine neue Theorie über den Einfluß mechanischer Reize auf die Differenzierung der Stützgewebe , 1965 .