A simulation study of the impacts of population subdivision on the mountain brushtail possum Trichosurus caninus Ogilby (Phalangeridae: Marsupialia), in south-eastern Australia. II. Loss of genetic variation within and between subpopulations

Abstract The subdivision of populations that results from habitat fragmentation can impact the amount and pattern of genetic variation in metapopulations of organisms. Subdivision can lead to a loss of heterozygosity, and increased inbreeding within subpopulations is one factor that may contribute to an extinction vortex. However, a number of genetic models have also shown that, under some conditions, subdivision of populations can protect heterozygosity and allelic diversity, and that small subpopulations can become adapted to inbreeding. In this study we further investigated the relationships between habitat fragmentation, population subdivision, and various measures of genetic variability. VORTEX, a computer program for Population Viability Analysis (PVA), was used to simulate the impacts of fragmentation and subdivision on the genetic variation within and between subpopulations of the mountain brushtail possum Trichosurus caninus Ogilby, a forest-dependent species of arboreal marsupial that inhabits wet sclerophyll forests and rainforests in eastern Australia. For this study and a related investigation of the demographic stability of populations of T. caninus, hypothetical populations of 100, 200 and 400 animals were partitioned into one to 10 subpopulations that were, in turn, linked by varying rates of migration between subpopulations. Our application of PVA allowed an examination of the effects on population dynamics of demographic fluctuations, genetic drift, and interactions between demographic and genetic processes. The results of our analysis showed that both gene diversity (heterozygosity) and allelic diversity of subpopulations and metapopulations were lost rapidly when a population was subdivided. The increased levels of demographic stochasticity that resulted from population subdivision caused a decrease in the effective population sizes of the metapopulations that were modelled as well as the ensemble of subpopulations in each case. This, in turn, resulted in more rapid losses of genetic variation than would occur in the absence of demographic fluctuations. The extinction of some subpopulations further accelerated the loss of gene diversity and alleles. In addition, the genetic and demographic instability of small, fragmented populations diminished the effectiveness of selection against recessive lethal alleles. Migration among subpopulations partly reversed the impacts of population subdivision. However, even high rates of migration did not eliminate demographic fluctuations or prevent subpopulation extinction. Therefore, although gene flow largely prevented genetic divergence between subpopulations, migration did not prevent subdivided populations from losing genetic variation more rapidly than single populations of the same total size. The dynamics of small, fragmented populations were shown to be critically dependent on the interactions between demographic and genetic processes. Thus, our findings are in striking contrast to the predictions made by several previous models of genetic changes in metapopulations that exclude consideration of the impacts of demographic stochasticity. These results demonstrated the value of PVA simulation models in revealing some of the consequences of fragmentation that have previously been overlooked. Our investigation has indicated that populations of forest-dependent taxa and other species that depend on habitats undergoing rapid change due to human activities may have to be relatively large and continuous to avoid significant losses of genetic variation.

[1]  R. Lande Genetics and demography in biological conservation. , 1988, Science.

[2]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  A simulation study of the impacts of population subdivision on the mountain brushtail possum Trichosurus caninus Ogilby (Phalangeridae: Marsupialia) in south-eastern Australia. I. Demographic stability and population persistence , 1995 .

[3]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Predictions of the impacts of changes in population size and environmental variablitity on Leadbeater's possum, Gymnobelideus leadbeateri McCoy (Marsupialia: Petauridae) using population viability analysis: an application of the computer program VORTEX. , 1993 .

[4]  R. Frankham,et al.  The effects of population size and selection intesnity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. II. Long-term response to selection. , 1968, Genetical research.

[5]  M. Shaffer Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .

[6]  Robert C. Lacy,et al.  VORTEX: a computer simulation model for population viability analysis , 1993 .

[7]  Jonathan D. Ballou,et al.  Estimates of Lethal Equivalents and the Cost of Inbreeding in Mammals , 1988 .

[8]  Oliver A. Ryder,et al.  Pedigree analysis by computer simulation , 1986 .

[9]  M. C. Grant,et al.  Associations Among Protein Heterozygosity, Growth Rate, and Developmental Homeostasis , 1984 .

[10]  Michael H. Smith,et al.  Management and maintenance of genetic variability in endangered species , 1980 .

[11]  M. Boyce Population Viability Analysis , 1992 .

[12]  M. Kimura,et al.  On the maximum avoidance of inbreeding , 1963 .

[13]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The Contribution of Population and Community Biology to Conservation Science , 1988 .

[14]  S. Wright Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Volume 3: Experimental Results and Evolutionary Deductions , 1977 .

[15]  M. Nei,et al.  FST AND GST STATISTICS IN THE FINITE ISLAND MODEL , 1984, Genetics.

[16]  S. Wright Evolution in mendelian populations , 1931 .

[17]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Inbreeding and fitness in captive populations: Lessons from Drosophila , 1993 .

[18]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.

[19]  E. Duffey,et al.  The scientific management of animal and plant communities for conservation , 1973 .

[20]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution and the Genetics of Populations: Volume 2, The Theory of Gene Frequencies , 1968 .

[21]  P. Fuerst,et al.  Considerations on the conservation of alleles and of genic heterozygosity in small managed populations , 1986 .

[22]  R. Lande,et al.  Viable Populations for Conservation: Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management , 1987 .

[23]  Robert C. Lacy,et al.  Impacts of Inbreeding in Natural and Captive Populations of Vertebrates: Implications for Conservation , 2015 .

[24]  D. Mccauley Genetic consequences of local population extinction and recolonization. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  A. Robertson A theory of limits in artificial selection , 1960, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[26]  O. H. Frankel,et al.  Conservation and Evolution , 1983 .

[27]  A. Templeton,et al.  Factors eliminating inbreeding depression in a captive herd of speke's gazelle (Gazella spekei) , 1984 .

[28]  P. Hedrick,et al.  Genetics and Conservation@@@Genetics and Conservation, A Reference for Managing Wild Animal and Plant Populations. , 1985 .

[29]  Peggy L. Fiedler,et al.  Conservation biology : the theory and practice of nature conservation, preservation, and management , 1992 .

[30]  K. Holsinger,et al.  Genetics and conservation of rare plants. , 1991 .

[31]  M. Taper,et al.  Environmental Variation and the Persistence of Small Populations. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[32]  N. Morton,et al.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES. , 1956, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Michael E. Gilpin,et al.  The genetic effective size of a metapopulation , 1991 .

[34]  Eric S. Menges,et al.  Population Viability Analysis for an Endangered Plant , 1990 .

[35]  R. Lacy The Effects of Inbreeding on Isolated Populations: Are Minimum Viable Population Sizes Predictable? , 1992 .

[36]  M. Soulé,et al.  Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity , 1987 .

[37]  M Slatkin,et al.  Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. , 1987, Science.

[38]  N. Takahata Gene identity and genetic differentiation of populations in the finite island model. , 1983, Genetics.

[39]  G. A. Watterson Allele frequencies after a bottleneck , 1984 .

[40]  K. Holsinger,et al.  Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants : implications for conservation , 1991 .

[41]  M. Nei,et al.  THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONS , 1975, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  W. Boecklen Optimal design of nature reserves: Consequences of genetic drift , 1986 .

[43]  M. Nei,et al.  Genetic variation in subdivided populations and conservation genetics , 1986, Heredity.

[44]  J. Michael Reed,et al.  Effective Population Size in Red‐Cockaded Woodpeckers: Population and Model Differences , 1993 .

[45]  Deborah Charlesworth,et al.  INBREEDING DEPRESSION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES , 1987 .

[46]  M. Soulé,et al.  Viable Populations for Conservation , 1987 .

[47]  Douglas T. Bolger,et al.  Reconstructed Dynamics of Rapid Extinctions of Chaparral‐Requiring Birds in Urban Habitat Islands , 1988 .

[48]  R. Lacy,et al.  Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peromyscus mice. , 1990, The Journal of heredity.

[49]  P. Fuerst,et al.  Population bottlenecks and nonequilibrium models in population genetics. II. Number of alleles in a small population that was formed by a recent bottleneck. , 1985, Genetics.

[50]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  An Environment‐metapopulation Approach to Population Viability Analysis for a Threatened Invertebrate , 1990 .

[51]  J. James The founder effect and response to artificial selection. , 1970, Genetical research.

[52]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective , 1980 .

[53]  N. Ryman,et al.  Population Genetics and Fishery Management , 1987 .

[54]  F. Allendorf Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity , 1986 .

[55]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[56]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[57]  R. Lacy Loss of Genetic Diversity from Managed Populations: Interacting Effects of Drift, Mutation, Immigration, Selection, and Population Subdivision , 1987 .

[58]  Margaret F. Kinnaird,et al.  Viable Populations for an Endangered Forest Primate, the Tana River Crested Mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus galeritus) , 1991 .

[59]  M. Kimura,et al.  Genetic variability and effective population size when local extinction and recolonization of subpopulations are frequent. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  S. Haig,et al.  Population Viability Analysis for a Small Population of Red-Cockaded Woodpeckers and an Evaluation of Enhancement Strategies , 1993 .