Knowledge Requirements and Management in Expert Decision Support Systems for (Military) Situation Assessment

Situation assessment tasks, e.g., medical diagnosis, battlefield reading, corporation status assessment for merger or acquisition purposes, are formulated as a general family of problem solving tasks. The generic nature of this family task as a multimembership hierarchical pattern recognition problem is characterized and the types of decision support systems (DSS) are identified. The focus is on knowledge representation and elicitation, although issues related to inference mechanisms, system structure, and expert-machine-user interface are also discussed. Two types of knowledge are distinguished: global knowledge and local knowledge. Global knowledge is required to determine directions on which to focus attention, while local knowledge is required for assessing the validity of a specific alternative based on a given set of findings. Global knowledge is represented as a network of relevancy pointers between alternatives and features. Attached to the links of this network are weights by which the strength of relevancy is evaluated and global directions (hypotheses) for situation analysis are determined. For local knowledge, it seems that in most practical problems multiple representation techniques would be required to characterize adequately the alternatives by means of their relevant features. The presentation is accompanied by examples for military situation assessment. However, comparable examples from medical and business applications are also cited. In fact, many of the ideas presented here have already been implemented in the MEDAS system¿a medical DSS for emergency and critical care medicine.

[1]  Randall Davis.  Knowledge acquisition in rule-based systems: knowledge about representation as a basis for system construction and maintenance , 1977, SGAR.

[2]  Moshe Ben-Bassat,et al.  TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE , 2022 .

[3]  E.H. Shortliffe,et al.  Knowledge engineering for medical decision making: A review of computer-based clinical decision aids , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Cognitive Processes and the Assessment of Subjective Probability Distributions , 1975 .

[5]  John Gaschnig,et al.  MODEL DESIGN IN THE PROSPECTOR CONSULTANT SYSTEM FOR MINERAL EXPLORATION , 1981 .

[6]  Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.  Production Rules as a Representation for a Knowledge-Based Consultation Program , 1977, Artif. Intell..

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Behavioral Decision Theory , 1977 .

[8]  Harry E. Pople,et al.  The Formation of Composite Hypotheses in Diagnostic Problem Solving: An Exercise in Synthetic Reasoning , 1977, IJCAI.

[9]  B. H. Beach.  Expert judgment about uncertainty: Bayesian decision making in realistic settings. , 1975, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[10]  George P. Huber,et al.  METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES AND MULTI‐ATTRIBUTE UTILITIES*† , 1974 .

[11]  Fernando Gomez,et al.  Knowledge Organization and Distribution for Medical Diagnosis , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  C. A. Kulikowski,et al.  Artificial intelligence methods and systems for medical consultation , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Moshe Ben-Bassat.  Irrelevant Features in Pattern Recognition , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[14]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  forecasters and probability forecasts: some current problems1,2 , 1971 .

[15]  Richard W. Carlson,et al.  Pattern-Based Interactive Diagnosis of Multiple Disorders: The MEDAS System , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.