Selecting Repertoires of Action in Environmental Movement Organizations

Environmental movement organizations (EMOs) that have similar goals frequently rely on different tactics and strategies to advance their agendas. This article uses an interpretive perspective to examine the factors influencing EMO selection of a repertoire of action. Building on concepts from organization and social movement theories, and relying on interview and archival data from Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace, this study suggests that experience, core values and beliefs, environmental philosophy, and political ideology work together to create distinct organizational interpretations of the political environment, efficacy of action, acceptability of tactics, significance of an issue, and source of the problem. These interpretations combine to shape EMO determinations of what types of action will be most appropriate and effective. Although structural factors influence the decisions that are made within EMOs, organizations also rely on interpretive processes in their selection of a repertoire of action.

[1]  Charles Perrow,et al.  Insurgency of the Powerless: Farm Worker Movements (1946-1972). , 1977 .

[2]  James M. Jasper,et al.  Losing Ground: American Environmentalism at the Close of the Twentieth Century , 1995 .

[3]  C. Tilly.  From mobilization to revolution , 1978 .

[4]  Deborah B. Balser.  The Impact of Environmental Factors on Factionalism and Schism in Social Movement Organizations , 1997 .

[5]  R. Dalton,et al.  The Green Rainbow: Environmental Groups in Western Europe , 1994 .

[6]  Doug McAdam,et al.  Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: The framing function of movement tactics: Strategic dramaturgy in the American civil rights movement , 1996 .

[7]  D. Mcadam.  Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency , 1983 .

[8]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Heather A. Haveman,et al.  Structuring a Theory of Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  赫尓徳,et al.  民主的模式 = Models of democracy , 1986 .

[11]  J. Jasper,et al.  The Art of Moral Protest, by James Jasper. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1997, 514 pp. $35.00 , 1999 .

[12]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 19901 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  R. Friedland.  Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[14]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[15]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  Ideologically Structured Action: An Enlarged Agenda for Social Movement Research , 2000 .

[16]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[17]  Peter K. Eisinger,et al.  The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[18]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[19]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements , 1997 .

[20]  P. Oliver,et al.  What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research , 2000 .

[21]  Michael Brown,et al.  The Greenpeace Story , 1991 .

[22]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View , 1985 .

[23]  D. S. Meyer.  Institutionalizing dissent: The United States structure of political opportunity and the end of the nuclear freeze movement , 1993 .

[24]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[25]  Neil J. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of sociology , 1989 .

[26]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[27]  D. S. Meyer.  Peace Protest and Policy , 1993 .

[28]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  The dynamics of social movements : resource mobilization, social control, and tactics , 1981 .

[29]  Sidney Tarrow,et al.  Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics , 1994 .

[30]  J. Carmin.  Voluntary associations, professional organisations and the environmental movement in the United States , 1999 .

[31]  Mary Bernstein,et al.  Celebration and Suppression: The Strategic Uses of Identity by the Lesbian and Gay Movement1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Grant Mccracken.  The long interview , 1988 .

[33]  J. D. Jardins,et al.  Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy , 1996 .

[34]  F. Pearce.  Green warriors: The people and the politics behind the environmental revolution , 1991 .

[35]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[36]  D. Mcadam.  Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970 , 1982 .

[37]  Robert Gottlieb,et al.  Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement , 1993 .

[38]  John Wilson.  Introduction to social movements , 1973 .

[39]  J. Gamson.  The organizational shaping of collective identity: The case of lesbian and gay film festivals in New York , 1996 .

[40]  R. Garner.  Contemporary movements and ideologies , 1995 .

[41]  S. Staggenborg.  The Consequences of Professionalization and Formalization in the Pro-Choice Movement , 1988 .

[42]  D. Strang,et al.  DIFFUSION IN ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills , 1998 .

[43]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Culture, ideology, and strategic framing , 1996 .

[44]  Michael C. Dreiling,et al.  Environmental Movement Organizations and Political Strategy , 2001 .

[45]  S. Staggenborg,et al.  Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.