Visual FMRI responses in human superior colliculus show a temporal-nasal asymmetry that is absent in lateral geniculate and visual cortex.

Eye patching has revealed enhanced saccadic latencies or attention effects when orienting toward visual stimuli presented in the temporal versus nasal hemifields of humans. Such behavioral advantages have been tentatively proposed to reflect possible temporal-nasal differences in the retinotectal pathway to the superior colliculus, rather than in the retinogeniculate pathway or visual cortex. However, this has not been directly tested with physiological measures in humans. Here, we examined responses of the human superior colliculus (SC) to contralateral visual field stimulation, using high spatial resolution fMRI, while manipulating which hemifield was stimulated and orthogonally which eye was patched. The SC responded more strongly to visual stimulation when eye-patching made this stimulation temporal rather than nasal. In contrast, the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) plus retinotopic cortical areas V1-V3 did not show any temporal-nasal differences and differed from the SC in this respect. These results provide the first direct physiological demonstration in humans that SC shows temporal-nasal differences that LGN and early visual cortex apparently do not. This may represent a temporal hemifield bias in the strength of the retinotectal pathway, leading to a preference for the contralateral hemifield in the contralateral eye.

[1]  A. Cowey,et al.  Nasal and temporal retinal ganglion cells projecting to the midbrain: Implications for “blindsight” , 1995, Neuroscience.

[2]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Spatiotopic Organization in Human Superior Colliculus Observed with fMRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[3]  S. Levay,et al.  The complete pattern of ocular dominance stripes in the striate cortex and visual field of the macaque monkey , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Functional imaging of the human lateral geniculate nucleus and pulvinar. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Creating connected representations of cortical gray matter for functional MRI visualization , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[7]  J. R. Baker,et al.  Imaging subcortical auditory activity in humans , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[8]  R. Turner,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain: data acquisition and analysis , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  D. Hubel,et al.  Mode of termination of retinotectal fibers in macaque monkey: An autoradiographic study , 1975, Brain Research.

[10]  C Blakemore,et al.  Binocular interaction in the cat's superior colliculus. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  Laemle Lk,et al.  A Golgy study of cellular morphology in the superficial layers of superior colliculus man, Saimiri, and Macaca. , 1981 .

[12]  Petroc Sumner,et al.  Signals Invisible to the Collicular and Magnocellular Pathways Can Capture Visual Attention , 2002, Current Biology.

[13]  Daphne Maurer,et al.  The development of the temporal and nasal visual fields during infancy , 1992, Vision Research.

[14]  Charles J. Campbell,et al.  The Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer. , 1965 .

[15]  James R Müller,et al.  Microstimulation of the superior colliculus focuses attention without moving the eyes. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Residual vision in the blind field of hemidecorticated humans predicted by a diffusion scatter model and selective spectral absorption of the human eye , 1999, Vision Research.

[17]  R. Rafal,et al.  A temporal/nasal asymmetry for blindsight in a localisation task: evidence for extrageniculate mediation , 2002, Neuroreport.

[18]  W. Fries Cortical projections to the superior colliculus in the macaque monkey: A retrograde study using horseradish peroxidase , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  T. L. Hickey,et al.  The distribution of retino‐collicular axon terminals in rhesus monkey , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[21]  Stephanie Clarke,et al.  Intrinsic connectivity of human superior colliculus , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Karl Zilles,et al.  Neuronal and glial structures of the superficial layers of the human superior colliculus , 1999, Anatomy and Embryology.

[23]  L. Laemle A Golgy study of cellular morphology in the superficial layers of superior colliculus man, Saimiri, and Macaca. , 1981, Journal fur Hirnforschung.

[24]  A. Vendrik,et al.  Responses of single units in the monkey superior colliculus to stationary flashing stimuli , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  G. E. Smith The Human Brain , 1924, Nature.

[26]  G H Glover,et al.  Image‐based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2005, Nature.

[28]  M. Posner,et al.  Chapter 3 Regulatory Mechanisms in Infant Development , 1990 .

[29]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  Robert M. McPeek,et al.  Deficits in saccade target selection after inactivation of superior colliculus , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[32]  Peter W Dicke,et al.  Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Driver,et al.  When pros become cons for anti- versus prosaccades: factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  A. Cowey,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells that project to the superior colliculus and pretectum in the macaque monkey , 1984, Neuroscience.

[35]  M E Wilson,et al.  Retino-tectal and cortico-tectal projections in Macaca mulatta. , 1970, Brain research.

[36]  A. Cowey,et al.  The role of light scatter in the residual visual sensitivity of patients with complete cerebral hemispherectomy , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[37]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Activity of superior colliculus in behaving monkey. I. Visual receptive fields of single neurons. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  Mark H. Johnson Cortical Maturation and the Development of Visual Attention in Early Infancy , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  B. Wandell,et al.  Visualization and Measurement of the Cortical Surface , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  J. Stone,et al.  The topography of primate retina: A study of the human, bushbaby, and new‐ and old‐world monkeys , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  Donald J. Lyle,et al.  The Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer , 1964 .

[42]  P. Schiller,et al.  Properties and tectal projections of monkey retinal ganglion cells. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  P. Sterling Quantitative mapping with the electron microscope: retinal terminals in the superior colliculus. , 1973, Brain research.

[44]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Extrageniculate Contributions to Reflex Visual Orienting in Normal Humans: A Temporal Hemifield Advantage , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Visual responses of the human superior colliculus: a high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging study. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  A Cohen,et al.  Extrageniculate vision in hemianopic humans: saccade inhibition by signals in the blind field. , 1990, Science.

[47]  H. Karten,et al.  The Origins of Neocortex: Connections and Lamination as Distinct Events in Evolution , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  M. Cynader,et al.  Receptive-field organization of monkey superior colliculus. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.