Treatment of naming in nonfluent aphasia through manipulation of intention and attention: A phase 1 comparison of two novel treatments

Twenty-three chronic nonfluent aphasia patients with moderate or severe word-finding impairments and 11 with profound word-finding impairments received two novel picture-naming treatments. The intention treatment initiated picture-naming trials with a complex left-hand movement and was designed to enhance right frontal participation during word retrieval. The attention treatment required patients to view visual stimuli for picture-naming trials in their left hemispace and was designed to enhance right posterior perisylvian participation during word retrieval. Because the intention treatment addressed action mechanisms and nonfluent aphasia reflects difficulty initiating or maintaining action (i.e., language output), it was hypothesized that intention component of the treatment would enhance re-acquisition of picture naming more than the attention component. Patients with moderate and severe word-finding impairment showed gains with both treatments but greater incremental improvement from one treatment phase to the next with the intention than the attention treatment. Thus, the hypothesis that intention component would be a more active constituent than the attention component was confirmed for these patients. Patients with profound word-finding impairment showed some improvement with both treatments but no differential effects for the intention treatment. Almost all patients who showed treatment gains on either treatment also demonstrated generalization from trained to untrained items. (JINS, 2007, 13, 582–594.)

[1]  G. Goldberg,et al.  Multi-modal hemispatial deficits after left hemisphere stroke. A disorder of attention? , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  C. Thompson,et al.  Erratum: The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: Training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality (Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research (June 2003) 46: (608-622)) , 2003 .

[3]  A. Kertesz.  The Western Aphasia Battery , 1982 .

[4]  A. Basso,et al.  The Role of the Right Hemisphere in Recovery from Aphasia. Two Case Studies , 1989, Cortex.

[5]  C. C. Tijssen,et al.  Aphasia with a left frontal interhemispheric hematoma , 1984, Neurology.

[6]  Bruce Crosson,et al.  Activation of intentional mechanisms through utilization of nonsymbolic movements in aphasia rehabilitation. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  Nielsen Jm,et al.  Bilateral lesions of the anterior cingulate gyri; report of case. , 1951 .

[8]  W J BANGS,et al.  Bilateral lesions of the anterior cingulate gyri; report of case. , 1956, Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society.

[9]  G. Pashek.  A case study of gesturally cued naming in aphasia: dominant versus nondominant hand training. , 1997, Journal of communication disorders.

[10]  B. Crosson,et al.  Selective attention and aphasia in adults: Preliminary findings , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  P. Strick,et al.  Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  B Anderson,et al.  Semantic neglect? , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  M. Metz-Lutz,et al.  Confrontation naming rehabilitation in aphasics: A computerised written technique , 1992 .

[14]  A. Raymer,et al.  Nonsymbolic movement training to improve sentence generation in transcortical motor aphasia: A case study , 2002 .

[15]  A. Verdú,et al.  Respiratory chain complex I deficiency in an infant with infantile spasms. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  M. Alexander.  Impairments of procedures for implementing complex language are due to disruption of frontal attention processes , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[17]  L. Murray,et al.  Auditory processing in individuals with mild aphasia: a study of resource allocation. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[18]  S Jonas,et al.  The supplementary motor region and speech emission. , 1981, Journal of communication disorders.

[19]  H. Branch Coslett,et al.  Spatial influences on motor and language function , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Cynthia K Thompson,et al.  The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[21]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[22]  K. Jellinger.  Cortex and Mind. Unifying Cognition , 2003 .

[23]  P. Doyle,et al.  Reconsidering the Hegemony of Linguistic Explanations in Aphasia: The Challenge for the Beginning of the Millennium , 2000, Brain and Language.

[24]  M. Kinsbourne.  The minor cerebral hemisphere as a source of aphasic speech. , 1971, Archives of neurology.

[25]  A E Hillis,et al.  Efficacy and generalization of treatment for aphasic naming errors. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  R. Tikofsky,et al.  Aphasia and Language: Theory to Practice , 2001 .

[27]  H. Karbe,et al.  Speech-induced cerebral metabolic activation reflects recovery from aphasia , 1997, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[28]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Subcortical aphasia , 1995, Neurology.

[29]  E J Auerbach,et al.  Activity in the paracingulate and cingulate sulci during word generation: an fMRI study of functional anatomy. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[31]  Coslett Hb,et al.  Spatial influences on motor and language function. , 1999 .

[32]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca’s area: An open-protocol study , 2005, Brain and Language.

[33]  Randall W. Smith,et al.  American Indian Sign (Amerind) as a Facilitator of Verbalization for the Oral Verbal Apraxic. , 1974 .

[34]  Keith D. White,et al.  Role of the Right and Left Hemispheres in Recovery of Function during Treatment of Intention in Aphasia , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  E. Auerbach,et al.  Relative Shift in Activity from Medial to Lateral Frontal Cortex During Internally Versus Externally Guided Word Generation , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Kinsbourne.  The Minor Cerebral Hemisphere , 1971 .

[37]  C. Thompson,et al.  Facilitation of Verbal Labeling in Adult Aphasia by Gestural, Verbal, or Verbal Plus Gestural Training , 1983 .

[38]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potential Imaging of Semantic Encoding during Processing Single Words , 1998, NeuroImage.

[39]  G Deloche,et al.  Diversity of patterns of improvement in confrontation naming rehabilitation: some tentative hypotheses. , 1997, Journal of communication disorders.

[40]  P. Milenkovic,et al.  An Investigation of Attention Allocation Deficits in Aphasia , 1993, Brain and Language.

[41]  Richard W Briggs,et al.  Left and right basal ganglia and frontal activity during language generation: Contributions to lexical, semantic, and phonological processes , 2003, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[42]  Jacinta Douglas,et al.  The differential facilitatory effects of gesture and visualisation processes on object naming in aphasia , 2001 .

[43]  W W Tryon,et al.  A simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions. , 1982, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[44]  B. Crosson,et al.  Treatment of word‐finding deficits in fluent aphasia through the manipulation of spatial attention: Preliminary findings , 2008, Aphasiology.