Development of a Computer‐Assisted Forensic Radiographic Identification Method Using the Lateral Cervical and Lumbar Spine

Medical examiners and coroners (ME/C) in the United States hold statutory responsibility to identify deceased individuals who fall under their jurisdiction. The computer‐assisted decedent identification (CADI) project was designed to modify software used in diagnosis and treatment of spinal injuries into a mathematically validated tool for ME/C identification of fleshed decedents. CADI software analyzes the shapes of targeted vertebral bodies imaged in an array of standard radiographs and quantifies the likelihood that any two of the radiographs contain matching vertebral bodies. Six validation tests measured the repeatability, reliability, and sensitivity of the method, and the effects of age, sex, and number of radiographs in array composition. CADI returned a 92–100% success rate in identifying the true matching pair of vertebrae within arrays of five to 30 radiographs. Further development of CADI is expected to produce a novel identification method for use in ME/C offices that is reliable, timely, and cost‐effective.

[1]  Tracy L Rogers,et al.  Expert testimony and positive identification of human remains through cranial suture patterns. , 2004, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  T. Rogers,et al.  Positive Personal Identification of Human Remains Based on Thoracic VertebralMargin Morphology , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  Angi M Christensen,et al.  Evidentiary Standards for Forensic Anthropology * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  K. An,et al.  Assessment of non-invasive intervertebral motion measurements in the lumbar spine. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  L. R. Dice.  Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[6]  T. Bohan,et al.  Ten years after Daubert: the status of the states. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  I. Dror,et al.  Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[8]  C. Stephan,et al.  Skeletal Identification by Radiographic Comparison: Blind Tests of a Morphoscopic Method Using Antemortem Chest Radiographs *,†,‡ , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  Bruce A. Schrader,et al.  Root Morphology and Anatomical Patterns in Forensic Dental Identification: A Comparison of Computer‐Aided Identification with Traditional Forensic Dental Identification * , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  D. O. North,et al.  An Analysis of the factors which determine signal/noise discrimination in pulsed-carrier systems , 1963 .

[11]  Angi M Christensen,et al.  Testing the reliability of frontal sinuses in positive identification. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  The fine print. , 1994, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[13]  W. J. Deadman.  THE IDENTIFICATION OF HUMAN REMAINS. , 1964, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[14]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[15]  D. Komar,et al.  Kumho, Daubert, and the Nature of Scientific Inquiry: Implications for Forensic Anthropology * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[16]  Laura Spinney,et al.  Science in court: The fine print , 2010, Nature.

[17]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[18]  B. Nafe,et al.  Identification of unknown dead bodies by X-ray image comparison of the skull using the X-ray simulation program FoXSIS. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[19]  G. Ginsburg,et al.  Asking the Gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges on Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert World , 2001, Law and human behavior.

[20]  P. Jaccard.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FLORA IN THE ALPINE ZONE.1 , 1912 .

[21]  C. Reitman,et al.  Changes in Segmental Intervertebral Motion Adjacent to Cervical Arthrodesis: A Prospective Study , 2004, Spine.

[22]  J. M. Ziegler,et al.  Intervertebral Motion Between Flexion and Extension in Asymptomatic Individuals , 2004, Spine.

[23]  Giovanna M. Vidoli,et al.  Anthropological and Radiographic Comparison of Vertebrae for Identification of Decomposed Human Remains , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[24]  C. Kuehn,et al.  Validation of chest X-ray comparisons for unknown decedent identification. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[25]  Nalini K. Ratha,et al.  Enhancing security and privacy in biometrics-based authentication systems , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[26]  Simon Ford,et al.  Sequential Unmasking: A Means of Minimizing Observer Effects in Forensic DNA Interpretation , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[27]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Potential usefulness of biological fingerprints in chest radiographs for automated patient recognition and identification. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[28]  Lior Shamir,et al.  Biometric identification using knee X-rays , 2009, Int. J. Biom..

[29]  M A Conditt,et al.  Brief report: validation of a system for automated measurement of knee laxity. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[30]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[31]  Robert A. Hummel,et al.  Image Enhancement by Histogram transformation , 1975 .

[32]  B. Adams,et al.  Radiographic identification using the clavicle of an individual missing from the Vietnam conflict. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[33]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[34]  J. A. Moreno.  Einstein on the Bench?: Exposing What Judges Do Not Know About Science and Using Child Abuse Cases to Improve How Courts Evaluate Scientific Evidence , 2003 .

[35]  Peter Neufeld,et al.  Making forensic science more scientific , 2010, Nature.

[36]  Fernando de Andrade Quintanilha Ribeiro.  Standardized Measurements of Radiographic Films of the Frontal Sinuses: An Aid to Identifying Unknown Persons , 2000 .

[37]  Kunio Doi,et al.  [Development of an automated patient-recognition method for digital chest radiographs using edge-enhanced images]. , 2003, Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi.

[38]  Angi M Christensen,et al.  The impact of Daubert: implications for testimony and research in forensic anthropology (and the use of frontal sinuses in personal identification). , 2004, Journal of forensic sciences.