A decision model for financial assurance instruments in the upstream petroleum sector

The main objective of this paper is to deepen the discussion regarding the application of financial assurance instruments, bonds, in the upstream oil sector. This paper will also attempt to explain the current choice of instruments within the sector. The concepts of environmental damages and internalization of environmental and regulatory costs will be briefly explored. Bonding mechanisms are presently being adopted by several governments with the objective of guaranteeing the availability of funds for end-of-leasing operations. Regulators are mainly concerned with the prospect of inheriting liabilities from lessees. Several forms of bonding instruments currently available were identified and a new instrument classification was proposed. Ten commonly used instruments were selected and analyzed under the perspective of both regulators and industry (surety, paid-in and periodic-payment collateral accounts, letters of credit, self-guarantees, investment grade securities, real estate collaterals, insurance policies, pools, and special funds). A multiattribute value function model was then proposed to examine current instrument preferences. Preliminary simulations confirm the current scenario where regulators are likely to require surety bonds, letters of credit, and periodic payment collateral account tools.

[1]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  The theory of environmental policy , 1976 .

[3]  C. Perrings.  Environmental Bonds and the Incentive to Research in Activities Involving Uncertain Future Effects , 1989 .

[4]  S. French.  Value‐focused thinking: A path to creative decision making, Keeney, R. L., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992, ISBN 0‐674‐93197‐1 , 1993 .

[5]  D. F. Ferreira,et al.  A New Approach For Accessing Offshore Decommissioning: A Decision Model For Performance Bonds , 2000 .

[6]  T. Derting,et al.  Ecology: A Bridge between Science and Society , 1998 .

[7]  R. S. D. Motta.  Economics of natural resources and the environment , 1990 .

[8]  Saul B. Suslick,et al.  Identifying potential impacts of bonding instruments on offshore oil projects , 2001 .

[9]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[10]  Charles Perrings,et al.  Environmental bonds and environmental research in innovative activities , 1989 .

[11]  K. Stollery,et al.  Environmental Controls in Extractive Industries , 1985 .

[12]  S. Kauffman.  At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[13]  David J. Webber,et al.  Promoting Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection in the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977: An Analysis of the Design and Implementation of Reclamation Peformance Bonds , 1985 .

[14]  Klaus Conrad,et al.  An Incentive Scheme for Optimal Pricing and Environmental Protection , 1987 .

[15]  Robert Costanza,et al.  An experimental analysis of the effectiveness of an environmental assurance bonding system on player behavior in a simulated firm , 1994 .

[16]  S. Patin.  Environmental Impact of the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry , 1999 .

[17]  Peter Bohm,et al.  Deposit-Refund Systems: Theory and Applications to Environmental, Conservation, and Consumer Policy , 1981 .

[18]  Michael Rowe.  Guarantees : standby letters of credit and other securities , 1989 .

[19]  Michelle A. McFaddin.  Oil and Gas Field Waste Regulations Handbook , 1996 .