The lit world: living with everyday urban automation

Abstract In this article, we develop and advance the concept of the lit world by bringing together literatures about everyday lighting, automation in everyday life and human perception, along with our ethnographic research into people’s experience of automated lighting in Melbourne, Australia. In doing so we formulate and argue for an approach to automation that situates it as part of everyday mundane worlds and acknowledges its entanglement with the emergent and experiential qualities of everyday environments as they unfold. We demonstrate this through the example of automated lighting, understood as a situated technology that has contingent effects and participates in the making of particular ways of seeing and feeling the world. We thereby argue for an account of automation that reaches beyond its potential for the management of human (and other) behaviour, to ask how the qualities and affordances of automated technologies might seep out of their intended domains, and create new perceptual and experiential opportunities. In a context where automation is increasingly prevalent in everyday life, such attention to the experience and use of automated technologies which already exist on a large scale is needed. Urban lighting is an example par excellence of automation in the world because it has a long history beyond the recent association of automated technologies with code and digital infrastructures. As scholars debate how automated technologies will become part of our future digital lives, understanding how people live in a lit world offers a starting point for considering how we might live with other anticipated algorithmic forms of automation.

[1]  D. Lanzeni.  Smart global futures: Designing affordable materialities for a better life , 2020 .

[2]  Andrew Irving.  The art of turning left and right , 2020 .

[3]  S. Pink,et al.  Anthropologies and futures: Setting the agenda , 2020, Anthropologies and Futures.

[4]  R. Smith,et al.  Digital Materialities: Design and Anthropology By Sarah Pink, Elisenda Ardèvol, and Dèbora Lanzeni, eds. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. , 2018, Visual Anthropology Review.

[5]  Sarah Pink,et al.  Being in a mediated world: self-tracking and the mind–body–environment , 2017 .

[6]  J. Urry.  What We Do Whilst Driving: Towards the Driverless Car , 2016 .

[7]  Sarah Pink,et al.  Moving, Making and Atmosphere: Routines of Home as Sites for Mundane Improvisation , 2016 .

[8]  Tim Ingold,et al.  Lighting up the atmosphere , 2016 .

[9]  M. Bille,et al.  A Sense of Place , 2016 .

[10]  Mikkel Bille,et al.  Elements of Architecture: Assembling archaeology, atmosphere and the performance of building spaces , 2016 .

[11]  Lea Fleischer,et al.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 2016 .

[12]  Robert Shaw,et al.  Controlling darkness: self, dark and the domestic night , 2015 .

[13]  M. Bille.  Hazy worlds: Atmospheric ontologies in Denmark , 2015 .

[14]  Casper Laing Ebbensgaard.  Illuminights: A Sensory Study of Illuminated Urban Environments in Copenhagen , 2015 .

[15]  P. Bjerregaard,et al.  Staging atmospheres: Materiality, culture, and the texture of the in-between , 2015 .

[16]  Mikkel Bille,et al.  Lighting up cosy atmospheres in Denmark , 2015 .

[17]  S. Pink.  Doing Sensory Ethnography , 2015 .

[18]  T. Edensor,et al.  “landscapism” at the speed of light: darkness and illumination in motion , 2015 .

[19]  D. Slater,et al.  Designing nocturnal cities: Illuminating the social role light plays in urban life. , 2015 .

[20]  Criss Shore,et al.  Governing by numbers: audit culture, rankings and the new world order , 2015 .

[21]  Sarah Royston,et al.  Smart energy technologies in everyday life: smart Utopia? , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[22]  Josiane Meier,et al.  The Rich Potentialities of Light Festivals: Defamiliarisation, a Sense of Place and Convivial Atmospheres , 2014 .

[23]  A. Dainty,et al.  The safe hand: Gels, water, gloves and the materiality of tactile knowing , 2014 .

[24]  Craig Hight,et al.  Automation within digital videography: from the Ken Burns Effect to ‘meaning-making’ engines , 2014 .

[25]  Shanti Sumartojo.  ‘Dazzling relief’: floodlighting and national affective atmospheres on VE Day 1945 , 2014 .

[26]  Samuel Kinsley.  The matter of ‘virtual’ geographies , 2014 .

[27]  T. Lewis,et al.  Making resilience: everyday affect and global affiliation in Australian Slow Cities , 2014 .

[28]  Попов Сергей Павлович.  Law J. After Method: mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge, 2004 , 2014 .

[29]  Robert Shaw.  Beyond Night-Time Economy: Affective Atmospheres of the Urban Night , 2014 .

[30]  James Ash,et al.  Technologies of Captivation , 2013 .

[31]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life , 2013 .

[32]  Tim Edensor,et al.  Illuminated Atmospheres: Anticipating and Reproducing the Flow of Affective Experience in Blackpool , 2012 .

[33]  J. Ash.  Attention, Videogames and the Retentional Economies of Affective Amplification , 2012 .

[34]  Matthew Zook.  Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life , 2012 .

[35]  Kenneth Y. Goldberg,et al.  Automation , 2018, AWS® Certified Advanced Networking Official Study Guide.

[36]  Nina J. Morris,et al.  Night walking: darkness and sensory perception in a night-time landscape installation , 2011 .

[37]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Divining a Digital Future - Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing , 2011 .

[38]  B. Anderson.  Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies , 2010 .

[39]  Tim Ingold,et al.  Footprints through the weather-world: walking, breathing, knowing , 2010 .

[40]  Ben Anderson,et al.  Affective atmospheres , 2009 .

[41]  Tim Ingold,et al.  Bindings against Boundaries: Entanglements of Life in an Open World , 2008 .

[42]  Peter Loizos,et al.  :The Corporeal Image: Film, Ethnography, and the Senses , 2007 .

[43]  Ingold Tim,et al.  Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. An Introduction [w:] ciż, eds , 2007 .

[44]  Elizabeth Hallam,et al.  Creativity and Cultural Improvisation: An Introduction , 2007 .

[45]  J. Law.  After Method: Mess in Social Science Research , 2004 .

[46]  A. Martín.  Review of: 'Textures of light: vision and touch in Irigaray, Levinas and Merleau-Ponty', by Cathryn Vasseleu. London: Routledge, 1998 , 2002 .

[47]  T. Ingold.  The perception of the environment : essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill , 2000 .

[48]  Joel r. Campbell,et al.  Light to dark , 1996 .

[49]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[50]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Phenomenology of perception. , 1978, Science.

[51]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .