Orchestrating Multi-Actor Collaborative Innovation Across Organizational Boundaries

Purpose The aim of this research is to increase the understanding of how strategic and long-term innovation efforts can be organised, operated and co-created within a project-based organisational setting. Design/Methodology/Approach A case study with a qualitative approach was chosen, showing a critical case with powerful examples rather than representative samples, to draw conclusions from. The analysis builds on the concept of absorptive capacity, which provides a multidimensional perspective on innovation activities in organisations. Findings The difficulties in orchestrating an interplay between innovation processes and the construction process in itself is presented. The study identifies effects from introducing new “innovation roles” as well as comprehending implications of collaborative contract forms for innovation. Research Limitations/Implications Based on a single case study, and being an in-depth empirical study, a rich description of innovation processes is provided which contributes to generalisation on processes rather than outcomes. The use of the absorptive capacity construct also contributes to a theoretically informed research on innovation in construction. Practical Implications The study provides valuable insights regarding how to conduct collaborative innovation in within the frame of construction projects. Originality/Value The study of a novel organisational setup, where multiple innovation processes is integrated in a construction project with a partnering contract, provides an understanding on how a construction client can manage the interplay between innovation processes and the construction process in itself. Furthermore, flows of knowledge and effects from introducing new innovation roles are unfolded.

[1]  Paul Chinowsky,et al.  A tool for enhancing innovation in construction organizations , 2013 .

[2]  Pernilla Gluch,et al.  Interactional perspective on environmental communication in construction projects , 2009 .

[3]  Susanne Engström,et al.  Sustaining inertia?: Construction clients' decision‐making and information‐processing approach to industrialized building innovations , 2012 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[5]  Nicolaj Siggelkow Persuasion with case studies , 2007 .

[6]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: Current Debates and Future Directions , 2009 .

[7]  Graham Winch,et al.  How innovative is construction? Comparing aggregated data on construction innovation and other sectors – a case of apples and pears , 2003 .

[8]  Per Erik Eriksson,et al.  Exploration and exploitation in project-based organizations: Development and diffusion of knowledge at different organizational levels in construction companies , 2013 .

[9]  Dilanthi Amaratunga,et al.  Client’s championing characteristics that promote construction innovation , 2011 .

[10]  Andreas Hartmann,et al.  Factors constituting the innovation adoption environment of public clients , 2008 .

[11]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[12]  Bart Bossink Assessment of a national system of sustainable innovation in residential construction: a case study from The Netherlands , 2009 .

[13]  Jan van den Ende,et al.  Innovation in project-based firms: The context dependency of success factors , 2006 .

[14]  Keith D. Hampson,et al.  Building constructive innovation networks: role of relationship management , 2007 .

[15]  Shu-Ling Lu,et al.  Clients Driving Innovation: Brandon/Clients Driving Innovation , 2008 .

[16]  D. Gann,et al.  Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK , 2005 .

[17]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[18]  Elkin Olaguer Pérez Sánchez,et al.  Measurement of potential absorption capacity in Colombia's innovative companies , 2017 .

[19]  John D. Leeth,et al.  Are Female Executives Over-Represented in Precarious Leadership Positions? , 2009 .

[20]  B. Ozorhon,et al.  Drivers of Innovation in Construction Projects , 2017 .

[21]  A. Kadefors Institutions in building projects: Implications for flexibility and change , 1995 .