Probing the mechanical properties of seismically active crust with space geodesy: Study of the coseismic deformation due to the 1992 Mw7.3 Landers (southern California) earthquake

[1] The coseismic deformation due to the 1992 M(w)7.3 Landers earthquake, southern California, is investigated using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements. The ERS-1 satellite data from the ascending and descending orbits are used to generate contiguous maps of three orthogonal components ( east, north, up) of the coseismic surface displacement field. The coseismic displacement field exhibits symmetries with respect to the rupture plane that are suggestive of a linear relationship between stress and strain in the crust. Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data show small-scale deformation on nearby faults of the Eastern California Shear Zone. Some of these faults ( in particular, the Calico, Rodman, and Pinto Mountain faults) were also subsequently strained by the 1999 M(w)7.1 Hector Mine earthquake. I test the hypothesis that the anomalous fault strain represents essentially an elastic response of kilometer-scale compliant fault zones to stressing by nearby earthquakes [Fialko et al., 2002]. The coseismic stress perturbations due to the Landers earthquake are computed using a slip model derived from inversions of the InSAR and GPS data. Calculations are performed for both homogeneous and transversely isotropic half-space models. The compliant zone model that best explains the deformation on the Calico and Pinto Mountain faults due to the Hector Mine earthquake successfully predicts the coseismic displacements on these faults induced by the Landers earthquake. Deformation on the Calico and Pinto Mountain faults implies about a factor of 2 reduction in the effective shear modulus within the similar to 2 km wide fault zones. The depth extent of the low-rigidity zones is poorly constrained but is likely in excess of a few kilometers. The same type of structure is able to explain high gradients in the radar line of sight displacements observed on other faults adjacent to the Landers rupture. In particular, the Lenwood fault north of the Soggy Lake has likely experienced a few centimeters of left-lateral motion across < 1-km-wide compliant fault zone having the rigidity reduction of more than a factor of 2. The inferred compliant fault zones are interpreted to be a result of extensive damage due to past earthquakes.

[1]  H. Honda.  The mechanism of the earthquakes , 1957 .

[2]  Leon Knopoff,et al.  Body Force Equivalents for Seismic Dislocations , 1964 .

[3]  Bernard Budiansky,et al.  Seismic velocities in dry and saturated cracked solids , 1974 .

[4]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Theoretical Basis of Some Empirical Relations in Seismology by Hiroo Kanamori And , 1975 .

[5]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[6]  Takashi Nakata,et al.  Time‐predictable recurrence model for large earthquakes , 1980 .

[7]  T. McEvilly,et al.  Interpretation of seismic reflection profiling data for the structure of the San Andreas fault zone , 1983 .

[8]  Y. Okada.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1985 .

[9]  Sean C. Solomon,et al.  Geodetic measurement of deformation in the central Mojave Desert, California , 1986 .

[10]  John M Kemeny,et al.  Effective moduli, non-linear deformation and strength of a cracked elastic solid , 1986 .

[11]  Wayne Thatcher,et al.  Long‐Term Seismic Potential of the San Andreas Fault Southeast of San Francisco, California , 1987 .

[12]  Steven G. Wesnousky,et al.  Seismological and structural evolution of strike-slip faults , 1988, Nature.

[13]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Mapping small elevation changes over large areas: Differential radar interferometry , 1989 .

[14]  F. J. Santarelli,et al.  Influence of stress-dependent elastic moduli on stresses and strains around axisymmetric boreholes , 1989 .

[15]  J. C. Savage,et al.  The velocity field along the San Andreas Fault in central and southern California , 1991 .

[16]  James R. Rice,et al.  Chapter 20 Fault Stress States, Pore Pressure Distributions, and the Weakness of the San Andreas Fault , 1992 .

[17]  A. Rubin.  Dike‐induced faulting and graben subsidence in volcanic rift zones , 1992 .

[18]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Initial investigation of the Landers, California, Earthquake of 28 June 1992 using TERRAscope , 1992 .

[19]  Jerome A. Treiman,et al.  Near-Field Investigations of the Landers Earthquake Sequence, April to July 1992 , 1993, Science.

[20]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Detection of crustal deformation from the Landers earthquake sequence using continuous geodetic measurements , 1993, Nature.

[21]  Interpretation of indirect tensile strength tests when moduli of deformation in compression and in tension are different , 1993 .

[22]  E. Hauksson,et al.  The 1992 Landers Earthquake Sequence: Seismological observations , 1993 .

[23]  K. Feigl,et al.  The displacement field of the Landers earthquake mapped by radar interferometry , 1993, Nature.

[24]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Satellite Radar Interferometry for Monitoring Ice Sheet Motion: Application to an Antarctic Ice Stream , 1993, Science.

[25]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Postseismic deformation following the Landers earthquake, California, 28 June 1992 , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[26]  P. Segall,et al.  The co-seismic slip distribution of the Landers earthquake , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[27]  Charles Werner,et al.  On the derivation of coseismic displacement fields using differential radar interferometry: The Landers earthquake , 1994 .

[28]  K. Hudnut,et al.  Slip Triggered on Southern California Faults by the 1992 Joshua Tree, Landers, and Big Bear Earthquakes , 1994 .

[29]  D. Wald,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of slip for the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[30]  Y. Bock,et al.  Co-seismic displacements of the 1992 landers earthquake sequence , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[31]  Rachel E. Abercrombie,et al.  Earthquake source scaling relationships from −1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at 2.5‐km depth , 1995 .

[32]  Kunihiko Shimazaki,et al.  FAULT TRACE COMPLEXITY, CUMULATIVE SLIP, AND THE SHAPE OF THE MAGNITUDE-FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR STRIKE-SLIP FAULTS : A GLOBAL SURVEY , 1996 .

[33]  E. Hauksson,et al.  Seismogenic deformation field in the Mojave block and implications for tectonics of the eastern California shear zone , 1996 .

[34]  W. Ellsworth,et al.  Fault-zone guided waves from explosions in the San Andreas fault at Parkfield and Cienega Valley, California , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[35]  James C. Savage,et al.  Postseismic deformation associated with the 1992 M ω=7.3 Landers earthquake, southern California , 1997 .

[36]  Xu,et al.  Evidence of shallow fault zone strengthening after the 1992 M7.5 landers, california, earthquake , 1998, Science.

[37]  David T. Sandwell,et al.  Small‐scale deformations associated with the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake mapped by synthetic aperture radar interferometry phase gradients , 1998 .

[38]  Earthquake source parameters and fault kinematics in the eastern California shear zone , 1998, physics/9806031.

[39]  K. Feigl,et al.  Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the Earth's surface , 1998 .

[40]  C. Scholz,et al.  The process zone: A microstructural view of fault growth , 1998 .

[41]  F. Chester,et al.  Ultracataclasite structure and friction processes of the Punchbowl Fault , 1998 .

[42]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Poroelastic rebound along the Landers 1992 earthquake surface rupture , 1998 .

[43]  J. C. Savage.  Displacement field for an edge dislocation in a layered half‐space , 1998 .

[44]  Jean Taboury,et al.  Measuring ground displacements from SAR amplitude images: Application to the Landers Earthquake , 1999 .

[45]  Michel Campillo,et al.  Contribution of radar interferometry to a two-step inversion of the kinematic process of the 1992 Landers earthquake , 1999 .

[46]  Peltzer,et al.  Evidence of Nonlinear Elasticity of the Crust from the Mw7.6 Manyi (Tibet) Earthquake. , 1999, Science.

[47]  M. Rymer.  Triggered Surface Slips in the Coachella Valley Area Associated with the 1992 Joshua Tree and Landers, California, Earthquakes , 2000 .

[48]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Near real‐time radar interferometry of the Mw 7.1 Hector Mine Earthquake , 2000 .

[49]  T. Farr,et al.  Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data , 2000 .

[50]  Fuk K. Li,et al.  Synthetic aperture radar interferometry , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[51]  Mark Simons,et al.  Deformation and seismicity in the Coso geothermal area, Inyo County, California: Observations and modeling using satellite radar interferometry , 2000 .

[52]  P. Rosen,et al.  SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR INTERFEROMETRY TO MEASURE EARTH'S SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY AND ITS DEFORMATION , 2000 .

[53]  T. Wright,et al.  Triggered slip: Observations of the 17 August 1999 Izmit (Turkey) Earthquake using radar interferometry , 2001 .

[54]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Earthquake cycle, fault zones, and seismicity patterns in a rheologically layered lithosphere , 2001 .

[55]  D. Agnew,et al.  The complete (3‐D) surface displacement field in the epicentral area of the 1999 MW7.1 Hector Mine Earthquake, California, from space geodetic observations , 2001 .

[56]  Mark Simons,et al.  Deformation due to a pressurized horizontal circular crack in an elastic half-space, with applications to volcano geodesy , 2001 .

[57]  R. Madariaga,et al.  Dynamic modeling of the 1992 Landers earthquake , 2001 .

[58]  David T. Sandwell,et al.  The 1999 (Mw 7.1) Hector Mine, California, Earthquake: Near-Field Postseismic Deformation from ERS Interferometry , 2002 .

[59]  S. Day,et al.  Postseismic Fault Healing on the Rupture Zone of the 1999 M 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake , 2002 .

[60]  Qizhi Chen,et al.  Geodetic Evidence for a Near-Fault Compliant Zone along the San Andreas Fault in the San Francisco Bay Area , 2002 .

[61]  H. Zebker,et al.  Fault Slip Distribution of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake, Estimated from Satellite Radar and GPS Measurements , 2002 .

[62]  Luis Rivera,et al.  A note on the dynamic and static displacements from a point source in multilayered media , 2002 .

[63]  L. Rivera,et al.  Coseismic Deformation from the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake as Inferred from InSAR and GPS Observations , 2002 .

[64]  Bernard Minster,et al.  Deformation on Nearby Faults Induced by the 1999 Hector Mine Earthquake , 2002, Science.

[65]  R. Sibson.  Thickness of the Seismic Slip Zone , 2003 .

[66]  C. Thurber,et al.  Earthquake locations and three‐dimensional fault zone structure along the creeping section of the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, CA: Preparing for SAFOD , 2003 .

[67]  K. Sieh,et al.  A Structural Interpretation of the Aftershock “Cloud” of the 1992 Mw 7.3 Landers Earthquake , 2003 .

[68]  John E. Vidale,et al.  Damage to the shallow Landers fault from the nearby Hector Mine earthquake , 2003, Nature.

[69]  David T. Sandwell,et al.  Accuracy and resolution of shuttle radar topography mission data , 2003 .

[70]  Rongjiang Wang,et al.  Erratum to: "Computation of deformation induced by earthquakes in a multi-layered elastic crust - FORTRAN programs EDGRN/EDCMP": [Computers & Geosciences, 29(2) (2003) 195-207] , 2006, Comput. Geosci..