Propagation of the measurement uncertainty for the numerical reconstruction of holograms in Fresnel approximation

This communication presents a set of expressions to evaluate the standard uncertainty and covariance of the real an imaginary parts of the complex-valued field resulting from the reconstruction of digital holograms by using the Fresnel approximation. These expressions are derived by applying the law of propagation of uncertainty as defined in the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” to the numerical evaluation of the Fresnel integral, understood as a linear function of the values in the digital hologram. The expressions are eventually applied to holograms produced by the interference of speckle patterns with uniform reference beams, and assuming that the square of the standard uncertainty in the digitized hologram depends linearly with its local values, according to the noise model adopted in the EMVA 1288 camera characterization standard. The resulting uncertainties and covariance of the real and imaginary parts of the reconstructed fields can be subsequently propagated to measurements of the phase change between holograms by following the procedure already presented in our previous work on the propagation of the measurement uncertainty in Fourier-transform digital holographic interferometry.

[1]  B D Hall,et al.  On the propagation of uncertainty in complex-valued quantities , 2004 .

[2]  Ángel F. Doval,et al.  Propagation of the measurement uncertainty in Fourier transform digital holographic interferometry , 2016 .

[3]  E. Iso,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty and Probability: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1995 .

[4]  Standard for Characterization of Image Sensors and Cameras Release 3 . 1 , 2010 .

[5]  Isaac Amidror,et al.  Mastering the Discrete Fourier Transform in One, Two or Several Dimensions , 2013, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[6]  J. Janesick,et al.  Charge-Coupled-Device Charge-Collection Efficiency And The Photon-Transfer Technique , 1987 .

[7]  Ángel F. Doval,et al.  Evaluation of the uncertainty of phase-difference measurements in (quasi-)Fourier transform digital holographic interferometry , 2015, Speckle: International Conference on Speckle Metrology.

[8]  S. Eichstädt,et al.  GUM2DFT—a software tool for uncertainty evaluation of transient signals in the frequency domain , 2016 .

[9]  JCGM 102 : 2011 Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 2 to the “ Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement ” – Extension to any number of output quantities , 2011 .

[10]  C. Liguori,et al.  Propagation of uncertainty in a discrete Fourier transform algorithm , 2000 .

[11]  Pascal Picart,et al.  Digital Holography: Li/Digital Holography , 2012 .

[12]  Werner Jüptner,et al.  Digital recording and numerical reconstruction of holograms , 2002 .

[13]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  The Design and Implementation of FFTW3 , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  U. Schnars,et al.  Digital recording and reconstruction of holograms in hologram interferometry and shearography. , 1994, Applied optics.

[15]  Werner P. O. Jueptner,et al.  Methods of digital holography: a comparison , 1997, Other Conferences.