The Role of Blood Pool Contrast Media in the Study of Tumor Pathophysiology

Characterizing the biological properties of individual tumors has become a major goal for non-invasive imaging. With growing enthusiasm, the use of serial MRI to monitor the pharmacokinetics of paramagnetic contrast media is being explored to functionally characterize tumors, particularly tumor vascularity. Analysis and kinetic modeling of the dynamic tumor enhancement response after contrast medium administration is being applied to generate quantitative estimates of microvascular characteristics, particularly the fractional blood volume and the microvascular permeability of tumor vessels. Understandably, it is commonly hoped by many MR imagers that the currently available and widely used gadolinium-based contrast media, all belonging in the class of small molecular contrast media (SMCM <1000 Daltons) will be satisfactory for characterization of microvessels with dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. But it should be emphasized that endothelial permeability to solutes of substantially different size cannot be equated. Unfortunately, SMCM are too small to optimally exploit the well-recognized hyperpermeability of neoplastic microvessels; such hyperpermeability, with rare exception, has been consistently demonstrated in relation to larger macromolecular solutes. Smaller solutes in the size range of commercially available gadolinium chelates are known to diffuse across vascular endothelium in both normal and neoplastic tissues; a notable exception being the blood–brain barrier. Thus, the differentiation of normal from neoplastic tissue by the MRI assay of tissue SMCM leakage is problematic. A macromolecular contrast media (MMCM) is favored to probe and quantitatively estimate by MRI the elevated macromolecular permeability of tumor microvessels. Another obstacle to quantitative MRI tumor characterization pursued with SMCM is the highly variable and unpredictable vascular extraction fraction, both in normal and in neoplastic tumor tissues. MMCM are also referred to as blood pool contrast media (BPCM). While BPCM/MMCM are now being clinically developed and positioned for governmental approval, prototype MMCM are being applied with considerable success in a host of experimental tumor models. The pre-clinical results show strongly positive and signifi cant correlations between MMCMassayed tumor vascular permeability and tumor blood volume with pathologic tumor grade, tumor angiogenesis as assayed by the histologic microvascular density, and with tumor response to multiple forms of anti-angiogenesis therapy. In groups of tumors characterized both by SMCM and MMCMenhanced MRI, the correlations between MRI assays and histopathologic endpoints are consistently superior using the macromolecular-enhanced imaging.

[1]  P. Hudgins,et al.  Ferumoxtran-10, a superparamagnetic iron oxide as a magnetic resonance enhancement agent for imaging lymph nodes: a phase 2 dose study. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  E. Kahn,et al.  Assessing perfusion and capillary permeability changes induced by a VEGF inhibitor in human tumor xenografts using macromolecular MR imaging contrast media. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[3]  B Hamm,et al.  New generation of monomer‐stabilized very small superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (VSOP) as contrast medium for MR angiography: Preclinical results in rats and rabbits , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  C. Crone,et al.  THE PERMEABILITY OF CAPILLARIES IN VARIOUS ORGANS AS DETERMINED BY USE OF THE 'INDICATOR DIFFUSION' METHOD. , 1963, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[5]  R K Jain,et al.  Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness. , 2000, The American journal of pathology.

[6]  A de Roos,et al.  Blood pool contrast agents for cardiovascular MR imaging , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  H. Augustin,et al.  Heterogeneity of angiogenesis and blood vessel maturation in human tumors: implications for antiangiogenic tumor therapies. , 2000, Cancer research.

[8]  P. Sejrsen,et al.  Capillary permeability in canine myocardium as determined by bolus injection, residue detection. , 1980, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  R K Jain,et al.  Barriers to drug delivery in solid tumors. , 1994, Scientific American.

[10]  O Nalcioglu,et al.  Investigation of longitudinal vascular changes in control and chemotherapy‐treated tumors to serve as therapeutic efficacy predictors , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Transport of molecules across tumor vasculature , 2004, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[12]  D M Shames,et al.  Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with histologic tumor grade: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  E. M. Renkin Transport of potassium-42 from blood to tissue in isolated mammalian skeletal muscles. , 1959, The American journal of physiology.

[14]  R. Brasch,et al.  Effect of varying the molecular weight of the MR contrast agent Gd‐DTPA‐polylysine on blood pharmacokinetics and enhancement patterns , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  R. Jain,et al.  Microvascular permeability of normal and neoplastic tissues. , 1986, Microvascular research.

[16]  T. Grist,et al.  Carotid MR angiography: phase II study of safety and efficacy for MS-325. , 2001, Radiology.

[17]  T. Helbich,et al.  MRI assessment of microvascular characteristics in experimental breast tumors using a new blood pool contrast agent (MS‐325) with correlations to histopathology , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  R. Jain,et al.  Microvascular architecture in a mammary carcinoma: branching patterns and vessel dimensions. , 1991, Cancer research.

[19]  E. Fleck,et al.  MR Coronary Angiography with the New Intravascular Contrast Agent B-22956/1: First Human Experience , 2002 .

[20]  R. Brasch,et al.  Pulmonary oxygen toxicity: Demonstration of abnormal capillary permeability using contrast-enhanced MRI , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[21]  D M Shames,et al.  Quantification of the extraction fraction for gadopentetate across breast cancer capillaries , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  J W Baish,et al.  Fractals and cancer. , 2000, Cancer research.

[23]  T. Helbich,et al.  A new polysaccharide macromolecular contrast agent for MR imaging: Biodistribution and imaging characteristics , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  H. Bloom,et al.  Histological Grading and Prognosis in Breast Cancer , 1957, British Journal of Cancer.

[25]  Debiao Li,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of coronary arteries: comparison of intra- and extravascular contrast agents in swine. , 2001, Radiology.

[26]  H. Dvorak,et al.  Identification and characterization of the blood vessels of solid tumors that are leaky to circulating macromolecules. , 1988, The American journal of pathology.

[27]  H. Möller,et al.  Carboxymethyldextran-A2-Gd-DOTA enhancement patterns in the abdomen and pelvis in an animal model , 2001, European Radiology.

[28]  O Nalcioglu,et al.  Tumor characterization with dynamic contrast–enhanced MRI using mr contrast agents of various molecular weights , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  M. Ogan,et al.  Albumin labeled with Gd-DTPA: an intravascular contrast-enhancing agent for magnetic resonance blood pool imaging: preparation and characterization. , 1987, Investigative radiology.

[30]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain: II. Experimental Validation , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[31]  N. Weidner,et al.  Current pathologic methods for measuring intratumoral microvessel density within breast carcinoma and other solid tumors , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[32]  A R Padhani,et al.  In vivo monitoring of tumor angiogenesis with MR imaging. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[33]  M. Wendland,et al.  Tumor blood volume assays using contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Regional heterogeneity and postmortem artifacts , 1999 .

[34]  M. Moseley,et al.  Comparison of Initial Biodistribution Patterns of Gd‐DTPA and Albumin‐(Gd‐DTPA) Using Rapid Spin Echo MR Imaging , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[35]  G. Bongartz,et al.  Effect of slice orientation in 3D magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the supra-aortic arteries , 1991, European Radiology.

[36]  Babich,et al.  Long-circulating gadolinium-loaded liposomes: potential use for magnetic resonance imaging of the blood pool. , 2000, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[37]  James I. Cohen,et al.  Comparison of two superparamagnetic viral-sized iron oxide particles ferumoxides and ferumoxtran-10 with a gadolinium chelate in imaging intracranial tumors. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[38]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Contrast agent‐enhanced, free‐breathing, three‐dimensional coronary magnetic resonance angiography , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[39]  J. Svendsen,et al.  Capillary permeability of 99mTc-DTPA and blood flow rate in the human myocardium determined by intracoronary bolus injection and residue detection. , 1992, Cardiology.

[40]  R. Dolan,et al.  Three‐dimensional MRI of coronary arteries using an intravascular contrast agent , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[41]  Masahiko Toyoda,et al.  Pathogenesis of acne , 2001, Medical Electron Microscopy.

[42]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the lung. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[43]  L. Sobin,et al.  Histological Typing of Breast Tumors 1 , 1982 .

[44]  Robert C Brasch,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate marker of tumor response to anti‐angiogenic therapy in a xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[45]  R. Brasch,et al.  Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent. , 1984, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  N. van Bruggen,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging detects suppression of tumor vascular permeability after administration of antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor. , 1998, Cancer investigation.

[47]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain: I. Theoretical Derivation , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[48]  R. Brasch,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging assessment of tumor capillary permeability: effect of irradiation on delivery of chemotherapy. , 1996, Radiology.

[49]  R. Brasch,et al.  Tumor microvascular characterization using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (USPIO) in an experimental breast cancer model , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[50]  D M Shames,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in an experimental model of human ovarian cancer demonstrating altered microvascular permeability after inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[51]  R. W. Scarff,et al.  Histological typing of breast tumors. , 1982, Tumori.

[52]  H. Dvorak,et al.  VPF/VEGF and the angiogenic response. , 2000, Seminars in perinatology.

[53]  Christina J. Herold,et al.  MRA of the lower extremities in patients with pulmonary embolism using a blood pool contrast agent: Initial experience , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[54]  H. Dvorak,et al.  Pathogenesis of tumor stroma generation: a critical role for leaky blood vessels and fibrin deposition. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[55]  R. Jain,et al.  Microvascular permeability of albumin, vascular surface area, and vascular volume measured in human adenocarcinoma LS174T using dorsal chamber in SCID mice. , 1993, Microvascular research.

[56]  L. Heuser,et al.  Differential macromolecular leakage from the vasculature of tumors , 1986, Cancer.

[57]  A. Foss,et al.  Endothelial Cells of Tumor Vessels: Abnormal but not Absent , 2004, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[58]  D M Shames,et al.  Mammary carcinoma model: correlation of macromolecular contrast-enhanced MR imaging characterizations of tumor microvasculature and histologic capillary density. , 1996, Radiology.

[59]  R. Jain,et al.  Measurement of capillary filtration coefficient in a solid tumor. , 1991, Cancer research.

[60]  H. Dvorak,et al.  Leaky tumor vessels: consequences for tumor stroma generation and for solid tumor therapy. , 1990, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[61]  J. Folkman,et al.  The role of angiogenesis in tumor growth. , 1992, Seminars in cancer biology.

[62]  B. Thompson,et al.  PET, CT, and MRI with Combidex for mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung carcinoma. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[63]  P. Okunieff,et al.  Characterization of the Effects of Antiangiogenic Agents on Tumor Pathophysiology , 2001, American journal of clinical oncology.

[64]  D. Drost,et al.  Simultaneous MRI measurement of blood flow, blood volume, and capillary permeability in mammary tumors using two different contrast agents , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[65]  T. Vogl,et al.  Gadomer-17-enhanced 3D navigator-echo MR angiography of the pulmonary arteries in pigs , 2002, European Radiology.

[66]  D C Peters,et al.  Steady-state and dynamic MR angiography with MS-325: initial experience in humans. , 1998, Radiology.

[67]  D M Shames,et al.  Assessment of a rapid clearance blood pool MR contrast medium (P792) for assays of microvascular characteristics in experimental breast tumors with correlations to histopathology , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[68]  P. Anelli,et al.  Preclinical profile and clinical potential of gadocoletic acid trisodium salt (B22956/1), a new intravascular contrast medium for MRI. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[69]  R. Brasch,et al.  Tumor angiography using high-resolution, three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine and a macromolecular blood-pool contrast agent. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[70]  M. Moseley,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tumor-bearing mice treated with human recombinant tumor necrosis factor alpha. , 1990, Cancer research.

[71]  R K Jain,et al.  Determinants of tumor blood flow: a review. , 1988, Cancer research.

[72]  R. Brasch,et al.  Tumor microvascular changes to anti-angiogenic treatment assessed by MR contrast media of different molecular weights. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[73]  J. Wood,et al.  MRI monitoring of tumor response to a novel VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor in an experimental breast cancer model. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[74]  R. Brasch,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Estimation of Altered Capillary Permeability in Experimental Mammary Carcinomas After X-Irradiation , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[75]  D M Shames,et al.  Comparison of Gadomer-17 and gadopentetate dimeglumine for differentiation of benign from malignant breast tumors with MR imaging. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[76]  C. Yuan,et al.  Time‐of‐flight MR angiography with Gd‐DTPA hexamethylene diamine co‐polymer blood pool contrast agent: Comparison of enhanced MRA and conventional angiography for arterial stenosis induced in rabbits , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.