Adaptation to Temporally Fluctuating Environments by the Evolution of Maternal Effects

All organisms live in temporally fluctuating environments. Theory predicts that the evolution of deterministic maternal effects (i.e., anticipatory maternal effects or transgenerational phenotypic plasticity) underlies adaptation to environments that fluctuate in a predictably alternating fashion over maternal-offspring generations. In contrast, randomizing maternal effects (i.e., diversifying and conservative bet-hedging), are expected to evolve in response to unpredictably fluctuating environments. Although maternal effects are common, evidence for their adaptive significance is equivocal since they can easily evolve as a correlated response to maternal selection and may or may not increase the future fitness of offspring. Using the hermaphroditic nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, we here show that the experimental evolution of maternal glycogen provisioning underlies adaptation to a fluctuating normoxia–anoxia hatching environment by increasing embryo survival under anoxia. In strictly alternating environments, we found that hermaphrodites evolved the ability to increase embryo glycogen provisioning when they experienced normoxia and to decrease embryo glycogen provisioning when they experienced anoxia. At odds with existing theory, however, populations facing irregularly fluctuating normoxia–anoxia hatching environments failed to evolve randomizing maternal effects. Instead, adaptation in these populations may have occurred through the evolution of fitness effects that percolate over multiple generations, as they maintained considerably high expected growth rates during experimental evolution despite evolving reduced fecundity and reduced embryo survival under one or two generations of anoxia. We develop theoretical models that explain why adaptation to a wide range of patterns of environmental fluctuations hinges on the existence of deterministic maternal effects, and that such deterministic maternal effects are more likely to contribute to adaptation than randomizing maternal effects.

[1]  M. Feldman,et al.  GENETIC VARIATION AND THE EVOLUTION OF EPIGENETIC REGULATION , 2014, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  A. Long,et al.  Experimental evolution reveals natural selection on standing genetic variation , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[3]  E. Dempster Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity. , 1955, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[4]  S. Harvey,et al.  All Eggs Are Not Equal: The Maternal Environment Affects Progeny Reproduction and Developmental Fate in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  R. Lande,et al.  Genetic correlations and maternal effect coefficients obtained from offspring-parent regression. , 1989, Genetics.

[6]  Andrew M. Simons,et al.  Modes of response to environmental change and the elusive empirical evidence for bet hedging , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  R. Lande,et al.  Adaptation, Plasticity, and Extinction in a Changing Environment: Towards a Predictive Theory , 2010, PLoS biology.

[8]  I. Chelo,et al.  Genotyping with Sequenom. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[9]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  The Evolution of Multivariate Maternal Effects , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Selection response in traits with maternal inheritance. , 1990, Genetical research.

[11]  J. Gillespie Natural Selection for Variances in Offspring Numbers: A New Evolutionary Principle , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[12]  F R Adler,et al.  The standard of neutrality: still flapping in the breeze? , 2010, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[13]  T. C. Evans,et al.  Translational control of maternal RNAs. , 2005, WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology.

[14]  E. Haag The evolution of nematode sex determination: C. elegans as a reference point for comparative biology. , 2005, WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology.

[15]  Natural and experimental evolution of sexual conflict within Caenorhabditis nematodes , 2015, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[16]  Tobias Uller,et al.  Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  A. Robertson A mathematical model of the culling process in dairy cattle , 1966 .

[18]  S. Proulx The rate of multi-step evolution in Moran and Wright-Fisher populations. , 2011, Theoretical population biology.

[19]  D. Reznick,et al.  Adaptation in a variable environment: Phenotypic plasticity and bet‐hedging during egg diapause and hatching in an annual killifish , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  P. Phillips,et al.  Selection and maintenance of androdioecy in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2002, Genetics.

[21]  John Fox,et al.  Robust Regression in R An Appendix to An R Companion to Applied Regression, Second Edition , 2011 .

[22]  M. Roth,et al.  Aquaporins-2 and -4 regulate glycogen metabolism and survival during hyposmotic-anoxic stress in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2015, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[23]  T. Uller,et al.  When is a maternal effect adaptive , 2007 .

[24]  J. J.,et al.  EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC VARIANCE , 2022 .

[25]  A. Simons,et al.  Experimental evolution of bet hedging under manipulated environmental uncertainty in Neurospora crassa , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  When Unreliable Cues Are Good Enough , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[27]  M. Lynch,et al.  Mutation Accumulation in Populations of Varying Size: The Distribution of Mutational Effects for Fitness Correlates in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2004, Genetics.

[28]  P. Padilla,et al.  Reduction in ovulation or male sex phenotype increases long-term anoxia survival in a daf-16-independent manner in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2009, Physiological genomics.

[29]  Dana L. Miller,et al.  C. Elegans Are Protected from Lethal Hypoxia by an Embryonic Diapause , 2009, Current Biology.

[30]  S. Gavrilets One-locus two-allele models with maternal (parental) selection. , 1998, Genetics.

[31]  O. Hobert,et al.  Starvation-Induced Transgenerational Inheritance of Small RNAs in C. elegans , 2014, Cell.

[32]  F. Menu,et al.  Bet‐Hedging Diapause Strategies in Stochastic Environments , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[33]  W. S. Cooper,et al.  The Evolution of Developmental Plasticity in Reproductive Characteristics: An Application of the "Adaptive Coin-Flipping" Principle , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[34]  Adaptation to temporally fluctuating environments by the evolution of maternal effects , 2015 .

[35]  I. Theologidis,et al.  Reproductive assurance drives transitions to self-fertilization in experimental Caenorhabditis elegans , 2014, BMC Biology.

[36]  S. Tuljapurkar Population dynamics in variable environments. II. Correlated environments, sensitivity analysis and dynamics , 1982 .

[37]  P. Phillips,et al.  Rapid Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity and Shifting Thresholds of Genetic Assimilation in the Nematode Caenorhabditis remanei , 2014, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[38]  S. Boutin,et al.  Density Triggers Maternal Hormones That Increase Adaptive Offspring Growth in a Wild Mammal , 2013, Science.

[39]  Mark Rees,et al.  Evolutionary bet-hedging in the real world: empirical evidence and challenges revealed by plants , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  A. J. Moore,et al.  Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[41]  R. Hoyle,et al.  The benefits of maternal effects in novel and in stable environments , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[42]  D. Marshall,et al.  Coping with environmental uncertainty: dynamic bet hedging as a maternal effect , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  S. Proulx,et al.  What kind of maternal effects are selected for in fluctuating environments? , 2015, bioRxiv.

[44]  T. Day,et al.  What can Invasion Analyses Tell us about Evolution under Stochasticity in Finite Populations , 2002 .

[45]  J. Hanrahan Maternal effects and selection response. , 1974 .

[46]  D. Irwin,et al.  The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  R. Lande Adaptation to an extraordinary environment by evolution of phenotypic plasticity and genetic assimilation , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[48]  S. Munch,et al.  Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity within- and across-generations: a challenge for theory? , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[50]  W B Wood,et al.  Early transcription in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. , 1994, Development.

[51]  J. Remy Stable inheritance of an acquired behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2010, Current Biology.

[52]  T. Uller,et al.  When is incomplete epigenetic resetting in germ cells favoured by natural selection? , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  E. W. Hutchinson,et al.  The Use of Selection to Probe Patterns of Pleiotropy in Fitness Characters , 1990 .

[54]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Establishment of New Mutations in Changing Environments , 2012, Genetics.

[55]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Flexible Generation of E-Learning Exams in R: Moodle Quizzes, OLAT Assessments, and Beyond , 2014 .

[56]  Luis-Miguel Chevin,et al.  On measuring selection in experimental evolution , 2010, Biology Letters.

[57]  T. Uller,et al.  Weak evidence for anticipatory parental effects in plants and animals , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[58]  J. McNamara,et al.  The Evolution of Transgenerational Integration of Information in Heterogeneous Environments , 2015, The American Naturalist.

[59]  M. Johnston,et al.  Developmental instability as a bet-hedging strategy , 1997 .

[60]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF REACTION NORMS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[61]  T. Day,et al.  A Unified Approach to the Evolutionary Consequences of Genetic and Nongenetic Inheritance , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[62]  P. Padilla,et al.  Dephosphorylation of cell cycle-regulated proteins correlates with anoxia-induced suspended animation in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[63]  D. Roach,et al.  MATERNAL EFFECTS IN PLANTS , 1987 .

[64]  M. Roth,et al.  Adaptive Sugar Provisioning Controls Survival of C. elegans Embryos in Adverse Environments , 2009, Current Biology.

[65]  M. Schreibman,et al.  Humason's Animal tissue techniques , 1997 .

[66]  P. Phillips,et al.  The transgenerational effects of heat stress in the nematode Caenorhabditis remanei are negative and rapidly eliminated under direct selection for increased stress resistance in larvae. , 2014, Genomics.

[67]  D. L. Venable,et al.  Seed Germination in Desert Annuals: An Empirical Test of Adaptive Bet Hedging , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[68]  D. Easterling,et al.  Observations: Atmosphere and surface , 2013 .

[69]  P. Padilla,et al.  Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Mediates Anoxia Response and Survival in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2006, Genetics.

[70]  J. Hofbauer,et al.  The adaptive advantage of phenotypic memory in changing environments. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[71]  D. Cohen Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. , 1966, Journal of theoretical biology.

[72]  B. Bowerman Maternal control of pattern formation in early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. , 1998, Current topics in developmental biology.

[73]  I. Chelo,et al.  Evolution of Outcrossing in Experimental Populations of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2012, PloS one.

[74]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[75]  E. Pollak,et al.  On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. III. Fixation probabilities under partial selfing when heterozygotes are intermediate in viability. , 1992, Genetics.

[76]  R. Lande EXPECTED RELATIVE FITNESS AND THE ADAPTIVE TOPOGRAPHY OF FLUCTUATING SELECTION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[77]  V. Carey,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus , 2001 .

[78]  I. Yanai,et al.  Natural RNA interference directs a heritable response to the environment , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[79]  A. Simons Fluctuating natural selection accounts for the evolution of diversification bet hedging , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[80]  M. Bateson,et al.  Adaptive developmental plasticity: what is it, how can we recognize it and when can it evolve? , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[81]  Paul Scheet,et al.  A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[82]  S. Boutin,et al.  Maternal effects and the response to selection in red squirrels , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[83]  Joel P. Brockman,et al.  What is Bet-Hedging , 1987 .

[84]  C. Fox,et al.  Maternal effects as adaptations , 1998 .

[85]  R. Hoyle,et al.  Fitness consequences of maternal and grandmaternal effects , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[86]  J. Halley Ecology, evolution and 1 f -noise. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[87]  Søren Højsgaard,et al.  A Kenward-Roger approximation and parametric bootstrap methods for tests in linear mixed models: The R Package pbkrtest , 2014 .

[88]  I. Chelo,et al.  THE OPPORTUNITY FOR BALANCING SELECTION IN EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OF CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[89]  J. Cheverud EVOLUTION BY KIN SELECTION: A QUANTITATIVE GENETIC MODEL ILLUSTRATED BY MATERNAL PERFORMANCE IN MICE , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[90]  Sanford Weisberg,et al.  An R Companion to Applied Regression , 2010 .

[91]  T. Day,et al.  The implications of nongenetic inheritance for evolution in changing environments , 2011, Evolutionary applications.

[92]  S. Emlen,et al.  Parent–offspring conflict , 1992, Nature.

[93]  Isabel Gordo,et al.  An experimental test on the probability of extinction of new genetic variants , 2013, Nature Communications.

[94]  E. Pollak,et al.  On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. I. Partial selfing. , 1988, Genetics.

[95]  T. Uller,et al.  The Information Value of Non-Genetic Inheritance in Plants and Animals , 2015, PloS one.

[96]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[97]  Perbandingan Kadar Lemak Dan Protein Saccaromyces Pada Biakan Air Ijuk, Media Ubi Dan Media Nasi Untuk Peningkatan Gizi , 2015 .

[98]  M. Roth,et al.  Glycogen Fuels Survival During Hyposmotic-Anoxic Stress in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2015, Genetics.

[99]  P. Phillips,et al.  Hermaphrodite life history and the maintenance of partial selfing in experimental populations of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2014, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[100]  D. Marshall,et al.  Deconstructing environmental predictability: seasonality, environmental colour and the biogeography of marine life histories. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[101]  J. Tufto Genetic evolution, plasticity, and bet‐hedging as adaptive responses to temporally autocorrelated fluctuating selection: A quantitative genetic model , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[102]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses to selection. , 1966, Genetical research.

[103]  R. Lande,et al.  GENOTYPE‐ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[104]  J. Gore,et al.  Hidden randomness between fitness landscapes limits reverse evolution. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[105]  M. Wade,et al.  What are maternal effects (and what are they not)? , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[106]  R. Hoyle,et al.  When to rely on maternal effects and when on phenotypic plasticity? , 2015, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[107]  T. Garland,et al.  The evolution of the placenta drives a shift in sexual selection in livebearing fish , 2014, Nature.

[108]  Samantha R Anderson,et al.  Cycles of species replacement emerge from locally induced maternal effects on offspring behavior in a passerine bird , 2015, Science.

[109]  Sean H. Rice,et al.  Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations , 2004 .

[110]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The fitness value of information , 2005, Oikos.

[111]  Julie R. Etterson,et al.  Transgenerational Plasticity Is Adaptive in the Wild , 2007, Science.

[112]  J. Hodgkin,et al.  More is not better: brood size and population growth in a self-fertilizing nematode , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.