Abstract With regard to a successive penetration of renewable energies and the implied need for system flexibility, stationary battery storage systems (BSS) are seen as hybrids, which can manoeuvre either on the demand or on the supply side, due to the bidirectional transformation process. In the scientific debate, the revenue side for BSS are often just titled and partially mapped for individual markets, which frequently leads to the conclusion that the investment in BSS does not pay off. Therefore, the core concept of the paper is the strategy to combine applications and their values, in order to extend the financial attractiveness. To specify and exemplify monetary value propositions (applications) and value networks (benefits) as well as the combination theory, a single and combined revenue model is examined: energy trading via day-ahead market (arbitrage) and energy trading in combination with frequency support via secondary control. The results show, that depending on the technology, the combined revenue model reduces the load factor and thus theoretically expands the BSS lifespan. Moreover, with modified market rules and individual bidder strategies there is a potential to generate higher proceeds with the combined revenue model.
[1]
Sandia Report,et al.
Energy Storage for the Electricity Grid: Benefits and Market Potential Assessment Guide A Study for the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program
,
2010
.
[2]
Detlef Stolten.
Energiespeicher für die Energiewende
,
2012
.
[3]
Hendrik Kondziella,et al.
Stromspeicher für die „Energiewende“ – eine akteursbasierte Analyse der zusätzlichen Speicherkosten
,
2013
.
[4]
Benedikt Battke,et al.
Multi-purpose technologies, lock-in and efficiency – Policy implications from the case of stationary electricity storage
,
2014
.
[5]
Amany von Oehsen,et al.
Langfristszenarien und Strategien für den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland bei Berücksichtigung der Entwicklung in Europa und global
,
2012
.