Evaluating complex digital resources

Squires (1999) discussed the gap between HCI (Human Computer Interaction) and the educational computing communities in their very different approaches to evaluating educational software. This paper revisits that issue in the context of evaluating digital resources, focusing on two approaches to evaluation: an HCI and an educational perspective. Squires and Preece's HCI evaluation model is a predictive model - it helps teachers decide whether or not to use educational software - whilst our own concern is in evaluating the use of learning technologies. It is suggested that in part the different approaches of the two communities relate to the different focus that each takes: in HCI the focus is typically on development and hence usability, whilst in education the concern is with the learner and teacher use. DOI: 10.1080/0968776030110102

[1]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Two approaches to enable the sharing and reuse of resources across instututions , 2002 .

[2]  Eileen Scanlon,et al.  Enriching accounts of computer-supported collaboration by using video data , 2003 .

[3]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  Utilization-Focused Evaluation , 1979 .

[4]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Predicting quality in educational software: Evaluating For Learning, Usability and the Synergy between Them , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[5]  Mimi Recker,et al.  An evaluation model for a digital library services tool , 2002, JCDL '02.

[6]  David Squires,et al.  Usability and Educational Software Design: Special Issue of Interacting with Computers , 1999, Interact. Comput..

[7]  Nicola H. Durbridge,et al.  Varying the Texture: A Study of Art, Learning and Multimedia , 1996 .

[8]  Ann Jones,et al.  Reflections on a model of evaluating learning technologies , 1998 .

[9]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of multimedia computer modules as enrichment exercises for introductory human geography , 1997 .

[10]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Integrative evaluation: an emerging role for classroom studies of CAL , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Richard Joiner,et al.  The Use and Implications of ICT for Supporting Practical Music Skills in the School Curriculum , 2003 .

[12]  Ann C. Jones,et al.  Evaluating information and communication technologies for learning , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[13]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  Barriers to the Use of Computer Assisted Learning , 1982 .

[14]  Cathy Lewin,et al.  ImpacT2 project: preliminary study 1: establishing the relationship between networked technology and attainment , 2000 .

[15]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Evaluating communication and information technologies: a toolkit for practitioners , 1998 .

[16]  Judith Calder,et al.  Programme Evaluation and Quality: A Comprehensive Guide to Setting Up an Evaluation System , 1994 .

[17]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Usability and learning: Evaluating the potential of educational software , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Douglas Harvey.  Now You See It, Now You Don't: Maintaining Digital Learning Objects for the Future , 2002 .

[19]  Ann C. Jones,et al.  Evaluating CAL at the open university: 15 years on , 1996, Comput. Educ..