A multi-strategy knowledge interoperability framework for heterogeneous learning objects

This paper presents a knowledge exchange framework that can leverage the interoperability among semantically heterogeneous learning objects. With the release of various e-Learning standards, learning contents and digital courses are easy to achieve cross-platform sharing, exchanging, and even reorganizing. However, knowledge sharing in semantic level is still a challenge due to that the learning materials can be presented in any form, such as audios, videos, web pages, and even flash files. The proposed knowledge exchange framework allows users to share their learning materials (also called "learning objects") in semantic level automatically. This framework contains two methodologies: the first is a semantic mapping between knowledge bases (i.e. ontologies) which have essentially similar concepts, and the second is an ontology-based classification algorithm for sharable learning objects. The proposed algorithm adopts the IMS DRI standard and classifies the sharable learning objects from heterogeneous repositories into a local knowledge base by their inner meaning instead of keyword matching. Significance of this research lies in the semantic inferring rules for ontology mapping and learning objects classification as well as the full automatic processing and self-optimizing capability. Focused on digital learning materials and contrasted to other traditional technologies, the proposed approach has experimentally demonstrated significantly improvement in performance.

[1]  Anjo Anjewierden,et al.  The KACTUS View on the 'O' word , 1995, IJCAI 1995.

[2]  Tzone-I Wang,et al.  Java learning object ontology , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).

[3]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Towards the Semantic Web: Ontology-driven Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[4]  Rogério Patricio Chagas do Nascimento,et al.  Visualization of Ontologies to Specify Semantic Descriptions of Services , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[5]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Understanding and building, using ontologies , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Andreas Abecker,et al.  Ontologies for information management: balancing formality, stability, and sharing scope , 2002, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[8]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Enhancing the semantic interoperability of multimedia through a core ontology , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[9]  Soe-Tsyr Yuan,et al.  Ontology-based structured cosine similarity in document summarization: with applications to mobile audio-based knowledge management , 2005, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[10]  Lin Liu,et al.  Building toward Capability Specifications of Web Services Based on an Environment Ontology , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[11]  Sudha Ram,et al.  Semantic conflict resolution ontology (SCROL): an ontology for detecting and resolving data and schema-level semantic conflicts , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[12]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Determining Semantic Similarity among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[13]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[14]  Adolfo Guzmán-Arenas,et al.  Knowledge accumulation through automatic merging of ontologies , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Chang-Shing Lee,et al.  Ontology-based fuzzy event extraction agent for Chinese e-news summarization , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  M. Brian Blake,et al.  Experimentation with local consensus ontologies with implications for automated service composition , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[17]  Athman Bouguettaya,et al.  A multilevel composability model for semantic Web services , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[18]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  Interoperability in Personalized Adaptive Learning , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[19]  Li-Yen Shue,et al.  The development of an ontology-based expert system for corporate financial rating , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Angel Rubio,et al.  Correlation between Gene Expression and GO Semantic Similarity , 2005, TCBB.

[21]  Bob J. Wielinga,et al.  Using explicit ontologies in KBS development , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  Chrisa Tsinaraki,et al.  Interoperability Support between MPEG-7/21 and OWL in DS-MIRF , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[23]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Ontologies and Knowledge Bases. Towards a Terminological Clarification , 1995 .

[24]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[25]  Dennis McLeod,et al.  Retrieval effectiveness of an ontology-based model for information selection , 2004, The VLDB Journal.

[26]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Comparing relationships in conceptual modeling: mapping to semantic classifications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[27]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Ontological evaluation of enterprise systems interoperability using ebXML , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[28]  Changtao Qu,et al.  Semantics-Enabled Service Discovery Framework in the SIMDAT Pharma Grid , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.